Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Intestinal Recovery Rate


bincongo

Recommended Posts

bincongo Contributor

I read an article on Celiac.com, sorry I can't remember the name, it said that the intestinal recovery rate was only 34% at 2 years and 66% at 5 years. Three factors influence this rate, those who did not follow the gluten free diet well, those with diarrhea and weight loss and those who showed total villous atrophy on biopsy. I had total villous atrophy on my biopsy so where does that leave me? Some have said it depends on where they took the biopsy. I guess my question is if they did this study did they look at the entire intestine for damage and has anyone done a study on damage done based on where they took the biopsy? If you can point me to studies I would like more information. I know Celiac's feel better on the diet but if only 66% have intestional improvement doesn't that mean more cancer risk for those who don't improve?

I found the article - Mucosal Recovery and Mortality in Adults With Celiac Disease After Treatment With a Gluten-Free Diet


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emilushka Contributor

Remember: one article isn't enough to create clinical guidelines. I found the article you were talking about. They only looked at 300 patients. Celiac is so different between people that I would wait until you see more studies before jumping to conclusions about yourself.

The key finding from this article is that there may be some usefulness to getting further biopsies to track recovery in adults with Celiac Disease.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The answer is that although Celiac predisposes to small bowel cancer and lymphoma, it does NOT predispose to colorectal cancer! YAY! (Didn't want to scare you by leaving the punchline until later.)

Open Original Shared Link

This one best addressed the lymphoma link. Basically what it says is that some people with refractory Celiac have such messed-up T-cells that they develop into a T-cell lymphoma. So this article basically linked the majority of the lymphoma risk to the refractory Celiac population.

Open Original Shared Link

The study of biopsy location seems to be stuck in the "Where should we biopsy?" stage. So I don't think anybody has done anything to figure out what damage where causes what outcomes. This research is all still very much in the baby stages, from what I can tell. However, interestingly enough, making sure there are duodenal bulb biopsies seems to be helpful for getting accurate diagnoses, so hopefully there will be an easier time getting answers for Celiac patients in the future.

tarnalberry Community Regular

Well, keep in mind that studies also find that fewer than half of all diagnosed celiacs actually stay strictly gluten free.

sa1937 Community Regular

Well, keep in mind that studies also find that fewer than half of all diagnosed celiacs actually stay strictly gluten free.

You mean "try as we may" with unintentional CC from time to time...or do they intentionally eat foods that are a no-no?

Skylark Collaborator

You mean "try as we may" with unintentional CC from time to time...or do they intentionally eat foods that are a no-no?

Some in the studies admit to intentionally eating gluten. They tend to be the ones with the poorest and slowest healing, which is not a surprise.

sa1937 Community Regular

Some in the studies admit to intentionally eating gluten. They tend to be the ones with the poorest and slowest healing, which is not a surprise.

Well that's not at all a surprise then.

bincongo Contributor

Remember: one article isn't enough to create clinical guidelines. I found the article you were talking about. They only looked at 300 patients. Celiac is so different between people that I would wait until you see more studies before jumping to conclusions about yourself.

The key finding from this article is that there may be some usefulness to getting further biopsies to track recovery in adults with Celiac Disease.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The answer is that although Celiac predisposes to small bowel cancer and lymphoma, it does NOT predispose to colorectal cancer! YAY! (Didn't want to scare you by leaving the punchline until later.)

Open Original Shared Link

This one best addressed the lymphoma link. Basically what it says is that some people with refractory Celiac have such messed-up T-cells that they develop into a T-cell lymphoma. So this article basically linked the majority of the lymphoma risk to the refractory Celiac population.

Open Original Shared Link

The study of biopsy location seems to be stuck in the "Where should we biopsy?" stage. So I don't think anybody has done anything to figure out what damage where causes what outcomes. This research is all still very much in the baby stages, from what I can tell. However, interestingly enough, making sure there are duodenal bulb biopsies seems to be helpful for getting accurate diagnoses, so hopefully there will be an easier time getting answers for Celiac patients in the future.

Thanks for the information. I read somewhere that only 5% of Celiac's develop the more serious things like cancer. I figure it must be in the group of 34% whose intestines don't improve. So if I am unlucky enough to be in that group then I did the math and that gives me a 20% chance of not recovering and/or getting cancer. I would guess that 5% is the refractory Celiac population. I am starting out on the wrong foot by having a bad biopsy but what are my choices. I have to be gluten free and 80% odds are better than nothing. I have learned that I will ask for a repeat biopsy. I am not sure how often I should have it done. My Gasto doctor gave me the impression I didn't ever need to come back unless some new problem developed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emilushka Contributor

Thanks for the information. I read somewhere that only 5% of Celiac's develop the more serious things like cancer. I figure it must be in the group of 34% whose intestines don't improve. So if I am unlucky enough to be in that group then I did the math and that gives me a 20% chance of not recovering and/or getting cancer. I would guess that 5% is the refractory Celiac population. I am starting out on the wrong foot by having a bad biopsy but what are my choices. I have to be gluten free and 80% odds are better than nothing. I have learned that I will ask for a repeat biopsy. I am not sure how often I should have it done. My Gasto doctor gave me the impression I didn't ever need to come back unless some new problem developed.

Just keep doing what you're doing. Stay gluten-free, be as healthy as possible, see your doc for routine check-ups. Make sure you don't ignore problems. That's honestly the best any of us can do, since we can all get hit by a bus tomorrow and negate all those pesky lymphoma risks completely.

Don't try to take your odds from this research. There's just not enough there for you to know really what it means for you, and saying you have "80% chance" is too scary and potentially totally unrealistic. You may have 99% or 50% or be in a car crash.

All any of us can do is our best. Enjoy what you've got, and don't ignore any symptom that seems WRONG to you. Get your regular health screenings.

At least we have Celiac and not Crohn's or Ulcerative Colitis! Those guys have it worse.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,913
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    patanddiane
    Newest Member
    patanddiane
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @klmgarland, My dermatitis herpetiformis didn't clear up until I became meticulous about cross contamination. I cut out gluten-free oats and all gluten-free foods, dairy and gluten-free rice. Additionally, getting the right amount of protein for my body weight helped significantly in my body's healing process ... along with supplementing with enough of all the vitamins and minerals ... especially Zinc and Magnesium. I went from 70kg to 82kg in a year. Protein with each meal 3 times daily, especially eggs at breakfast made the difference. I'm not sure whether iodine was a problem for me, but I can tolerate iodine no problem now. I'm off Dapsone and feel great. Not a sign of an itch. So there is hope. I'm not advocating for the use of Dapsone, but it can bring a huge amount of relief despite it's effect on red blood cells. The itch is so distracting and debilitating. I tried many times to get off it, it wasn't until I implemented the changes above and was consistent that I got off it. Dermatitis Herpetiformis is horrible, I wouldn't wish it on anyone.  
    • klmgarland
      Thank you so very much Scott.  Just having someone understand my situation is so very helpful.  If I have one more family member ask me how my little itchy skin thing is going and can't you just take a pill and it will go away and just a little bit of gluten can't hurt you!!!! I think I will scream!!
    • Scott Adams
      It is difficult to do the detective work of tracking down hidden sources of cross-contamination. The scenarios you described—the kiss, the dish towel, the toaster, the grandbaby's fingers—are all classic ways those with dermatitis herpetiformis might get glutened, and it's a brutal learning curve that the medical world rarely prepares you for. It is difficult to have to deal with such hyper-vigilance. The fact that you have made your entire home environment, from makeup to cleaners, gluten-free is a big achievement, but it's clear the external world and shared spaces remain a minefield. Considering Dapsone is a logical and often necessary step for many with DH to break the cycle of itching and allow the skin to heal while you continue your detective work; it is a powerful tool to give you back your quality of life and sleep. You are not failing; you are fighting an incredibly steep battle. For a more specific direction, connecting with a dedicated celiac support group (online or locally) can be invaluable, as members exchange the most current, real-world tips for avoiding cross-contamination that you simply won't find in a pamphlet. You have already done the hardest part by getting a correct diagnosis. Now, the community can help you navigate the rest. If you have DH you will likely also want to avoid iodine, which is common in seafoods and dairy products, as it can exacerbate symptoms in some people. This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
    • Scott Adams
      It's very frustrating to be dismissed by medical professionals, especially when you are the one living with the reality of your condition every day. Having to be your own advocate and "fight" for a doctor who will listen is an exhausting burden that no one should have to carry. While that 1998 brochure is a crucial piece of your personal history, it's infuriating that the medical system often requires more contemporary, formal documentation to take a condition seriously. It's a common and deeply unfair situation for those who were diagnosed decades ago, before current record-keeping and testing were standard. You are not alone in this struggle.
    • Scott Adams
      Methylprednisolone is sometimes prescribed for significant inflammation of the stomach and intestines, particularly for conditions like Crohn's disease, certain types of severe colitis, or autoimmune-related gastrointestinal inflammation. As a corticosteroid, it works by powerfully and quickly suppressing the immune system's inflammatory response. For many people, it can be very effective at reducing inflammation and providing rapid relief from symptoms like pain, diarrhea, and bleeding, often serving as a short-term "rescue" treatment to bring a severe flare under control. However, experiences can vary, and its effectiveness depends heavily on the specific cause of the inflammation. It's also important to be aware that while it can work well, it comes with potential side effects, especially with longer-term use, so it's typically used for the shortest duration possible under close medical supervision. It's always best to discuss the potential benefits and risks specific to your situation with your gastroenterologist.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.