Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Intestinal Recovery Rate


bincongo

Recommended Posts

bincongo Contributor

I read an article on Celiac.com, sorry I can't remember the name, it said that the intestinal recovery rate was only 34% at 2 years and 66% at 5 years. Three factors influence this rate, those who did not follow the gluten free diet well, those with diarrhea and weight loss and those who showed total villous atrophy on biopsy. I had total villous atrophy on my biopsy so where does that leave me? Some have said it depends on where they took the biopsy. I guess my question is if they did this study did they look at the entire intestine for damage and has anyone done a study on damage done based on where they took the biopsy? If you can point me to studies I would like more information. I know Celiac's feel better on the diet but if only 66% have intestional improvement doesn't that mean more cancer risk for those who don't improve?

I found the article - Mucosal Recovery and Mortality in Adults With Celiac Disease After Treatment With a Gluten-Free Diet


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emilushka Contributor

Remember: one article isn't enough to create clinical guidelines. I found the article you were talking about. They only looked at 300 patients. Celiac is so different between people that I would wait until you see more studies before jumping to conclusions about yourself.

The key finding from this article is that there may be some usefulness to getting further biopsies to track recovery in adults with Celiac Disease.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The answer is that although Celiac predisposes to small bowel cancer and lymphoma, it does NOT predispose to colorectal cancer! YAY! (Didn't want to scare you by leaving the punchline until later.)

Open Original Shared Link

This one best addressed the lymphoma link. Basically what it says is that some people with refractory Celiac have such messed-up T-cells that they develop into a T-cell lymphoma. So this article basically linked the majority of the lymphoma risk to the refractory Celiac population.

Open Original Shared Link

The study of biopsy location seems to be stuck in the "Where should we biopsy?" stage. So I don't think anybody has done anything to figure out what damage where causes what outcomes. This research is all still very much in the baby stages, from what I can tell. However, interestingly enough, making sure there are duodenal bulb biopsies seems to be helpful for getting accurate diagnoses, so hopefully there will be an easier time getting answers for Celiac patients in the future.

tarnalberry Community Regular

Well, keep in mind that studies also find that fewer than half of all diagnosed celiacs actually stay strictly gluten free.

sa1937 Community Regular

Well, keep in mind that studies also find that fewer than half of all diagnosed celiacs actually stay strictly gluten free.

You mean "try as we may" with unintentional CC from time to time...or do they intentionally eat foods that are a no-no?

Skylark Collaborator

You mean "try as we may" with unintentional CC from time to time...or do they intentionally eat foods that are a no-no?

Some in the studies admit to intentionally eating gluten. They tend to be the ones with the poorest and slowest healing, which is not a surprise.

sa1937 Community Regular

Some in the studies admit to intentionally eating gluten. They tend to be the ones with the poorest and slowest healing, which is not a surprise.

Well that's not at all a surprise then.

bincongo Contributor

Remember: one article isn't enough to create clinical guidelines. I found the article you were talking about. They only looked at 300 patients. Celiac is so different between people that I would wait until you see more studies before jumping to conclusions about yourself.

The key finding from this article is that there may be some usefulness to getting further biopsies to track recovery in adults with Celiac Disease.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The answer is that although Celiac predisposes to small bowel cancer and lymphoma, it does NOT predispose to colorectal cancer! YAY! (Didn't want to scare you by leaving the punchline until later.)

Open Original Shared Link

This one best addressed the lymphoma link. Basically what it says is that some people with refractory Celiac have such messed-up T-cells that they develop into a T-cell lymphoma. So this article basically linked the majority of the lymphoma risk to the refractory Celiac population.

Open Original Shared Link

The study of biopsy location seems to be stuck in the "Where should we biopsy?" stage. So I don't think anybody has done anything to figure out what damage where causes what outcomes. This research is all still very much in the baby stages, from what I can tell. However, interestingly enough, making sure there are duodenal bulb biopsies seems to be helpful for getting accurate diagnoses, so hopefully there will be an easier time getting answers for Celiac patients in the future.

Thanks for the information. I read somewhere that only 5% of Celiac's develop the more serious things like cancer. I figure it must be in the group of 34% whose intestines don't improve. So if I am unlucky enough to be in that group then I did the math and that gives me a 20% chance of not recovering and/or getting cancer. I would guess that 5% is the refractory Celiac population. I am starting out on the wrong foot by having a bad biopsy but what are my choices. I have to be gluten free and 80% odds are better than nothing. I have learned that I will ask for a repeat biopsy. I am not sure how often I should have it done. My Gasto doctor gave me the impression I didn't ever need to come back unless some new problem developed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emilushka Contributor

Thanks for the information. I read somewhere that only 5% of Celiac's develop the more serious things like cancer. I figure it must be in the group of 34% whose intestines don't improve. So if I am unlucky enough to be in that group then I did the math and that gives me a 20% chance of not recovering and/or getting cancer. I would guess that 5% is the refractory Celiac population. I am starting out on the wrong foot by having a bad biopsy but what are my choices. I have to be gluten free and 80% odds are better than nothing. I have learned that I will ask for a repeat biopsy. I am not sure how often I should have it done. My Gasto doctor gave me the impression I didn't ever need to come back unless some new problem developed.

Just keep doing what you're doing. Stay gluten-free, be as healthy as possible, see your doc for routine check-ups. Make sure you don't ignore problems. That's honestly the best any of us can do, since we can all get hit by a bus tomorrow and negate all those pesky lymphoma risks completely.

Don't try to take your odds from this research. There's just not enough there for you to know really what it means for you, and saying you have "80% chance" is too scary and potentially totally unrealistic. You may have 99% or 50% or be in a car crash.

All any of us can do is our best. Enjoy what you've got, and don't ignore any symptom that seems WRONG to you. Get your regular health screenings.

At least we have Celiac and not Crohn's or Ulcerative Colitis! Those guys have it worse.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.