Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Sympathetic Gastroenterologists?


The Horticulturalist

Recommended Posts

The Horticulturalist Apprentice

Just wondering if any of you have found, or heard of, any GI docs that would acknowledge the possibility of non-celiac gluten intolerance? From just reading around the internet it seems to be mainly naturopath type docs that would be willing to consider this.

I know my own doc probably isn't one who would consider this, given that he thinks it's IBS as I have -ve on all my tests.

thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Katie B Apprentice

I'm thinking that non-celiac gluten intolerance would be included under the umbrella of IBS. Some doctors now believe that a lot of IBS is caused by small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (Dr. Pimental) and that a diet that includes wheat aggravates this condition. This also includes fructose malabsorption and lactose intolerance - if the intestines can't process certain foods then it leaves undigested food for the bacteria to feed on and multiply - making bloating, diarrhea/constipation, nausea even worse.

I'm currently on the low FODMAP diet for bacterial overgrowth and it's working very well. My GI specialist was the one who recommended it and it's a scientifically-based diet for functional problems (vs colitis or crohn's):

Open Original Shared Link

Note that it isn't gluten-free but it is easy to modify to be gluten-free. As mentioned in a recent article featured on this site a lot of celiacs still have symptoms after they've gone gluten-free. This may be because they're unknowingly consuming gluten and/or the damage to their intestines is so extensive that they just can't process foods well enough - leaving leftovers for the bacteria. In my case, I never did get a clear diagnosis because the damage to the villi can be due to bacterial overgrowth and/or celiac disease and all of my other tests were inconclusive.

Anyways, hope this helps!

Kay DH Apprentice

I don't think that most medical doctors know much about gluten, this includes GI doctors, and as such they dismiss symptoms. I've also found them too inclined to believe tests than to think about what symptoms may mean. My gluten intolerance started a year ago, after getting the flu. I did have minor symptoms before this, such as low D vitamins and thyroid, inflammatory arthritis that went away 20 years ago, and (undiagnosed) symmetrical skin rashes or a few decades. I had a celiac panel 2.5 years ago and it was negative. After the flu my symptoms were quite severe and my tolerance for bread dropped from the loaf to the crumb level. Symptoms included joints, brain fog, muscle aches, lethargy, D, C, cramps, bloating, rashes, sores in mouth, and so on. So, I went to a doctor for the stiff joints, and he did nothing. So, I researched arthritis, and gluten popped up. I went off gluten a couple of months after the flu, and my GI problems resolved in 3 days, the joints and other problems within a few months. I had a celiac panel 2 months after gluten-free, and it was negative. I had colonoscopy/endoscopy 6 months after gluten-free and the GI only had me on the gluten challenge for a (sick) week and only took 1 biopsy of my duodenum, which was negative. He dismissed most of my symptoms and assigned the rest to diverticulitis. Needless to say, I did not have any diverticuli or unfriendly bacteria/parasite blooms. He wouldn't even discuss the gluten problem, just said I only had a 10% chance of celiac with my HLA-DQ8 gene, and my Dad died of GI cancer because of food storage/prep techniques early last century. I am negative for wheat/gluten allergies. So, I have probably have celiac but don't know, and won't be tested again unless one can be gluten-free. By the way, this particular GI doctor was not directly recommended on the local celiac website, although another doctor at his practice was, followed by "(also coworkers)". I misinterpreted this to mean other doctors in the practice. :rolleyes:

Kay DH Apprentice

Another point is that the gluten probably was an immune system irritant for me for decades, but the flu was the trigger. I have a number of friends and family members that would not fit under the celiac umbrella in that they do not have anemia, short stature, thin, etc., but they have significant associated symptoms. I haven't seen much information about people having gluten sensitivity, or sensitivity that morphs into celiac due to environmental triggers, but I suspect it is one of the reasons that the market for gluten-free foods has expanded so quickly. Too bad medical science is slow to catch up. I have a friend that is an internist and she said they only studied celiac for a few minutes in school. She said "it seems to run in families?".

mushroom Proficient

This is one area where the patients are way ahead of the doctors, because the medical profession has no tests that we can pass :lol: It is not the fault of the patients with the problem, it is the fault of science and their inability to devise the test. :rolleyes:

cassP Contributor

interestingly (and strange maybe)- BOTH my General Practitioner AND my GI AND some of their nurses- were totally sympathetic to and in complete acknowledgement of NONCeliac Gluten Intolerance.

i was surprised- cause they're both still traditional docs who didnt know as much about Celiac as most of us do- and also didnt want to diagnose me without the Biopsies- YET- they were completely open to people having gluten intolerance or sensitivity.

T.H. Community Regular

Mine would be, I believe.

My GI was one who was telling me to tell the office all my symptoms, all the foods that made me feel bad, whether or not I had tested as being allergic to them, because 'tests don't tell us everything.'

So yeah...he was great. :-)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cassP Contributor

oh- and ps- my GI actually told me to go to the online community - that i could probably learn even more than from him- (that would be all of you guys :)

Skylark Collaborator

Just wondering if any of you have found, or heard of, any GI docs that would acknowledge the possibility of non-celiac gluten intolerance? From just reading around the internet it seems to be mainly naturopath type docs that would be willing to consider this.

I know my own doc probably isn't one who would consider this, given that he thinks it's IBS as I have -ve on all my tests.

thanks

Out of curiosity, why does it matter? Your doctor does not control what you eat. The only treatment for non-celiac gluten intolerance is to go on a gluten-free diet (sometimes casein-free too). If there are still lingering GI problems gluten-free, the diet will not affect your doctor's ability to treat you.

By the way, I have yet to run across a doctor who has not been supportive. They all say I should not eat something that makes me sick and I am getting care that includes testing for deficiencies. Not one of the four family medicine doctors I've run across in the past five years has thought I should worry about testing or formal diagnosis.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarahmegan
    Newest Member
    Sarahmegan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.