Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused


Debs78

Recommended Posts

Debs78 Newbie

Hi, I am new here. Basically I have been having problems with nausea, fatigue, dizziness, diarrea and stomach pains etc for over a year now. I have been desperatly trying to find out what is wrong.

My friend suggested I could be gluten intolerant so I went to the doctors to get a blood test done. In the mean time I cut out all gluten from my diet. Totally. It has been a week now and I am feeling the difference. No Nausea, really really awake, alot more than normal, so much more happier! My partner said I am how I used to be a few years ago and he thought he owuld never get me back.

Thing is my blood test results came back negetive. They say I have not got celiac disease. I dont know what the next step is. I know there is a non celiac gluten intolerance but I dont think the doctors here would even consider it. Is there anyway of testing for this?

Thank you for your help


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Dixiebell Contributor

Welcome!

Those blood tests are not 100%. Many people have had false negatives.

Your next step would be to schedule an endoscopy with biopsy, but you would need to eat gluten again and keep eating it until after testing is done. If you don't want to keep eating gluten, then take your symptoms clearing up as your diagnosis. If you continue to have problems, being gluten-free will not mask other things that might be going on. Maybe if you were to keep a diary of your food intake along with your symptoms, your Dr. might be able to diagnose you based on that.

Skylark Collaborator

I'm glad you found something that has made you well again!

The way non-celiac gluten intolerance is diagnosed is by response to the diet with negative celiac tests. As Dixiebell mentions, you could gluten yourself back up and ask for a biopsy. It depends on whether response to the diet is enough to keep you gluten-free or whether you feel like you need a "diagnosis". I was never diagnosed, as I couldn't stand the thought of going back on gluten for the tests. It makes me too sick.

Debs78 Newbie

I'm glad you found something that has made you well again!

The way non-celiac gluten intolerance is diagnosed is by response to the diet with negative celiac tests. As Dixiebell mentions, you could gluten yourself back up and ask for a biopsy. It depends on whether response to the diet is enough to keep you gluten-free or whether you feel like you need a "diagnosis". I was never diagnosed, as I couldn't stand the thought of going back on gluten for the tests. It makes me too sick.

I think I will stay off gluten for awhile longer - see how it goes. If my symptoms dont come back I will take that as my diagnosis. Like you I dont think I could stand feeling like that again. It litterally ruined my life. I can stay off gluten without diagnosis because just the fact I feel great and love life again would be enough for me to stay off gluten forever!!

Thank you for your advice. I think I will stick around here as its great to know there is others out there that are the same!

Just one more question. If I stay off gluten for a month and then try it again to see what happens so that I can be sure, will I react much worse than I did whilst I was always eating it? Would the symptoms return more violently?

Skylark Collaborator

Most of us find that the symptoms from eating wheat after going gluten-free for a while are somewhat stronger. It's also common to get symptoms from small amounts that wouldn't have given you trouble before. This does not seem to happen to gluten-tolerant folks, who can cut gluten out and return to eating it with no issues at all.

None of us knows for sure, but the guess is that your immune system isn't working well under constant assault from gluten. Once you take the gluten away and things normalize, the gluten reactions become stronger. That's only a guess from the collective wisdom of the board, so take it with a grain of salt. B)

SGWhiskers Collaborator

Two extra thoughts:

Post your lab results with reference ranges. It is possible that the doctor's office did a screening not a full panel and that is why the results are negative.

Not all celiacs/gluten intolerent folks will react worse after reintroducing gluten. My reactions have gotten milder after going gluten free, but they are definately noticable and bring back that old familiar ick.

OK, 3 thoughts:

If you stay gluten free, be strict about it and then if you reintroduce gluten, it may be a 15 minute to 3-5 day reaction delay from the moment that pizza hits your lips.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,683
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jean Tonkin
    Newest Member
    Jean Tonkin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.