Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lab Test, Will Insurance Pay?

bincongo

Recommended Posts

bincongo Contributor
bincongo
Posted

My daughter has decided to go for gene testing and I gave her the information for using Mayo Clinic labs but I am wondering if her insurance will pay for it. Does she need to contact her insurance company in order to have part of it payed for and to see which lab they use? I don't know what insurance company she has. When the doctor orders it is there a certain code he should use based on the fact that I, her mother has Celiac?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


adab8ca Enthusiast
adab8ca
Posted

My daughter has decided to go for gene testing and I gave her the information for using Mayo Clinic labs but I am wondering if her insurance will pay for it. Does she need to contact her insurance company in order to have part of it payed for and to see which lab they use? I don't know what insurance company she has. When the doctor orders it is there a certain code he should use based on the fact that I, her mother has Celiac?

She should contact her insurance company. In Canada, I know it is not covered and even the regular Celiac blood tests are not covered by insurance (although the biopsy is).

Has she had other testing done that is inconclusive? The gene test will not tell you if you have Celiac, just that you have the genes to get it. I think lots of people have the genetic markers and only a small fraction ever get the disease.

bincongo Contributor
bincongo
Posted
  • Author

She should contact her insurance company. In Canada, I know it is not covered and even the regular Celiac blood tests are not covered by insurance (although the biopsy is).

Has she had other testing done that is inconclusive? The gene test will not tell you if you have Celiac, just that you have the genes to get it. I think lots of people have the genetic markers and only a small fraction ever get the disease.

She has not had any testing done. My sister has the gene and symptoms for Celiac so she is getting more testing done. I want my daughter to have gene testing done because I am a known Celiac. I think she needs to know if she has the gene first since she doesn't have symptoms that I know of. If insurance companies will only pay for the antibody testing then I need to know that. It seems backward though because if she is negative than it only means she doesn't have it now. I would think the gene testing is more worthwhile.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

The value of the testing depends on your view. Your daughter already has a "positive" genetic test, as a first-degree relative of a celiac. It is abundantly clear that the DQ2 and DQ8 tests do not tell the whole story anyway. What if those aren't the celiac genes in your family? What you really need to know is if there is intestinal damage that could hurt her absorption of nutrients for the baby, right?

There is no harm in the genetic tests, but your daughter really needs to have a celiac panel preferably with the new deamidated gliadin peptide test. It would be awful for her to get a false sense of security from genetic tests.

As far as insurance, it only covered my Mom after she had the negative normal celiac panel.

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

The univ of Chicago Celiac Center sent me the stuff for genetic tests to be sent to Kimball labs. They are $395. Just a little FYI.

I think it would be better spent to get the celiac blood tests to see if she has active celiac. I think they were about $300 but our insurance paid for my kids to get them because I have it. It is a " family history" code. If she is having any symptoms, particullary GI ones, that would be an excellent primary code to justify the tests using the family history as a second or third or fourth.

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

She has not had any testing done. My sister has the gene and symptoms for Celiac so she is getting more testing done. I want my daughter to have gene testing done because I am a known Celiac. I think she needs to know if she has the gene first since she doesn't have symptoms that I know of. If insurance companies will only pay for the antibody testing then I need to know that. It seems backward though because if she is negative than it only means she doesn't have it now. I would think the gene testing is more worthwhile.

Just re- read your post and saw she doesn't have symptoms. I choose not to get my boys gene tested because:

They are still researching the genes involved in this disease. I would hate to give them a false sense of " I can't have it" in case they come up with more info

I didn't want the positive genes on their medical records. The way insurance companies are, I don't want them denied insurance or denied coverage because it's a pre- existing condition.

I have been told that the military and perhaps other programs will not accept people with celiac disease. Having the gene doesn't mean you have celiac disease but I'm afraid they will decide that is a reason not to take them ( if they chose that).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Mmoc
      - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results.
    2. Aretaeus Cappadocia
      - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to...
    3. trents
      - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies...
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted...
    5. Wheatwacked
      - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

      Have you had your 25(OH)D vitamin D blood level checked? Vitamin D deficiency occurs in 40 - 60% of western societies. It is even more common in Celiac Disease because of malabsorption syndrome. Appropriate intake of vitamin D or skin production from sun, increases the absorbtion rate of Calcium.and phosphorus, two minerals crucial to...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

      By Mmoc · Posted

      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Gluten free nuts

      By Aretaeus Cappadocia · Posted

      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      By trents · Posted

      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.