Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Nonceliac Gluten Intolerance


enolah

Recommended Posts

enolah Rookie

We are assuming my oldest dd has nonceliac gluten intolerance. She had negative antibodies and a negative biopsy despite classic symptoms, DQ2 heterozygote genetic profile. She is now back on a gluten and dairy free diet after having broken the diet for nearly 3 months in order to undergo her biopsy.

She may be slightly better after two weeks on the diet. I understand in the case of celiac disease why it might take longer to heal, but if she really is "only" gluten intolerant, why would it take longer to feel better?

Does anybody know what the proposed mechanism is for non-celiac gluten intolerance? When no pathology is seen, it's hard to imagine why she would have symptoms.

Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



YoloGx Rookie

We are assuming my oldest dd has nonceliac gluten intolerance. She had negative antibodies and a negative biopsy despite classic symptoms, DQ2 heterozygote genetic profile. She is now back on a gluten and dairy free diet after having broken the diet for nearly 3 months in order to undergo her biopsy.

She may be slightly better after two weeks on the diet. I understand in the case of celiac disease why it might take longer to heal, but if she really is "only" gluten intolerant, why would it take longer to feel better?

Does anybody know what the proposed mechanism is for non-celiac gluten intolerance? When no pathology is seen, it's hard to imagine why she would have symptoms.

Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.

I too am interested in seeing what other folks here have to say about this subject since I have members of my family who are gluten intolerant but not testable, as well as those who are officially celiac.

There is so much our scientific community has not yet researched adequately concerning this subject of gluten intolerance. In addition, there are many different degrees of sensitivity.

It also may be that you caught it in the early stages before a lot of damage to the villi could be found in the biopsy. It often is difficult to find the damaged area(s). If she does better without gluten and suffers from ingesting gluten (and even has symptoms from being cross contaminated with gluten) like someone who has celiac, I would treat her condition just like celiac. Many folks here on this site are in the same camp as that.

According to the book DANGEROUS GRAINS by Braly and Hoggan, gluten isn't fully digested by anyone. It also can precipitate a variety of degenerative diseases, including autoimmune responses such as celiac.

Bea

kwylee Apprentice

I do not have celiac disease but have tested gluten and casein intolerant. I also had to remove soy of any kind. Now more than 6 months into having eliminated all of these, I feel fantastic - as long as I do not accidentally cross contaminate. I have read about the possibility that I'll be able to add casein and soy back in time (never will be able to ingest gluten again but it's a fair trade for how good I feel and think).

I read such varied stories on this forum and others. There are some who feel that if you are gluten intolerant you must have Celiac disease, but I think that is a fallacy. Research seems to be slow in this area, I suppose it is because the only cure isn't an expensive drug, but elimination. I do think the previous poster hit the nail on the head, that everyone has problems with gluten. Age, and to what extent the body in intolerant, may be key factors in the severity (and wide range) of symptoms, and the time it takes for the body to get back to normal. And that's what the body wants to do. In my case, it took a couple of months after eliminating the offenders, to feel much better.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.