Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Sensitivity Levels Among Us


SuperMolly

Recommended Posts

SuperMolly Apprentice

When I was diagnosed with celiac disease 2 years ago I was told I was "lucky" because I can feel the effects of gluten when I ingest it. My dietician told me there are many celiacs who have no symptoms from gluten and that can be even more dangerous because it still damages the body.

What are your thoughts on this?

How come some with Celiac Disease react to trace amounts of gluten and others don't?

Do we all have the same amount of damage in our bodies because we all have the same disease, regardless of our varied reaction levels?

There is so much I still don't know.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Latent or silent celiacs can be suffering just as much damage to their bodies as those who have raging GI symptoms. Not everybody expresses their intolerance through the digestive tract. Some have only neurological symptoms and have migraines and gluten ataxia and are diagnosed even with MS. Some just end up with Hashimoto's thyroiditis or diabetes. Some of us have milder digestive symptoms that are dismissed for a lifetime as IBS and we end up with such things as psoriatic arthritis (me) and it is too late for a gluten free diet to reverse it.

Those with GI symptoms are more likely to recognize a reaction to trace amounts of gluten, but GI reactions vary greatly in their intensity. Those whose symptoms are not expressed that way do not get that sharp warning. That is why you were told you were lucky. It is not possible to quantify the amount of damage to our bodies caused by gluten, because we are still learning the ways in which gluten damages our bodies. There is so much still to know.

dilettantesteph Collaborator

I wonder the same thing. I am sensitive to the 20 ppm acceptable limit. Does that make me more or less likely to have hidden damage?

DougE Rookie

Hi SuperMolly,

Thanks for asking this question. I am one of those with Celiac who does not experience significant symptoms. I rely on others to tell me if certain products are safe. Otherwise, I have no way of knowing. For example, I am told that 90 percent of Celiacs can eat gluten-free oats, but I do not dare try them. How would I know if I am sensitive to them?

I do know that regardless of symptoms I still am damaging myself by eating gluten. This has raised another question in my mind... Are symptoms and damage even related? What about all of those who do experience symptoms when eating gluten? If they eat small enough amounts that they do not experience symptoms, does that necessarily mean that the amounts are low enough that they are not doing damage?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,352
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Beth Ramsey
    Newest Member
    Beth Ramsey
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.