Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do We Need An Endoscopy?


Staceyshoe

Recommended Posts

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Both my boys have had digestive issues from birth (different problems though). We did genetic testing on them just to see whether celiac is a possibility. My oldest (5 y.o.) ds tested positive for THE celiac gene and subtype most likely to result in the disorder. Since he's eating gluten now, we just went in for the blood panel. He's been on gluten-free diets in the past for up to 4-6 weeks, and we didn't notice any real change. But our family recently went gluten-free for a while (my youngest was diagnosed with a severe wheat allergy), and I noticed more problems with my oldest when he started eating gluten again. Nothing major. Nothing that makes me feel I can conclude that gluten is definitely an issue. Definitely not the stereotypical picture of celiac disease.

Still waiting on the results of the blood test. If it's negative, I may do a gluten-free trial and see what happens. If it's positive, the GI wants to do an endoscopy. I'm hesitant about that test. Ds has a scope 3 years ago, and it was emotionally traumatic for him. So here are my questions:

* The blood panel is notorious for false negatives, right? So if it's positive, what is the likelihood that he doesn't have celiac? I guess I don't see the point of the scope.

* If he's creating antibodies to gluten, does it really matter whether they happen to find no damage, mild damage, or severe damage in his intestines?

* Or does it make sense to find out what's happening in there and get an official diagnosis? (This GI won't diagnose without the scope.) Part of me wants to know for sure whether he has it because the diets haven't given a clear indication and because there are other family members with blatant symptoms who don't see a need to get tested or go gluten-free. But I also don't want the scope. Wouldn't the bloodwork be fairly conclusive?

I'm so thankful this forum is here! I've already learned a lot, but I am really struggling with what our next step should be.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



shopgirl Contributor

Yes, the blood panel can show false negatives but rarely false positives. Particularly in a child who can't build up a couple decades of damage.

If he's creating antibodies, no, it doesn't matter the amount of damage. He'll heal on a careful diet.

The only thing that might make you want a scope is cooperation from his school. They may not make necessary allowances for his diet and contamination issues without a diagnosis from a doctor. And if your doctor isn't willing to give an official diagnosis without the scope, you might run into some problems. Maybe ask the school if that would be an issue?

Skylark Collaborator

I completely agree with Shopgirl. The blood panel is 98% accurate in kids.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

I completely trust the knowledge of those who have been on this board for a while. I am satisfied that, if his blood panel is positive, it means he has celiac. Do you happen to know of any links that give info about the reliability of the blood test on a child? (If dh or other family members question me if the dr doesn't give an official diagnosis, I'd like to have something to show them that it's reasonable to assume celiac based on the bloodwork.) TIA!

Skylark Collaborator

Which blood test?

divamomma Enthusiast

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Which blood test?

I'm still waiting on the results, but I remember the dr mentioning that he was ordering a ttg and IgA and something to make sure ds isn't IgA deficient. There may be more also. I'll request a copy of the report so will know more after it's been processed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Different labs have different "normal" ranges because the test results are in arbitrary units. Something one lab calls 10 on a scale of 1-20, another lab could call 100 on a scale of 10-200. You have to have the range that lab considers normal to interpret the test. I've seen pretty big numbers from some European labs. If your TTG was above the normal range for that diagnostic lab you should have an endoscopy and be seriously considering gluten-free.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,076
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.