Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Gluten Challenge


Cara in Boston

Recommended Posts

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

I can't believe it is mid-March and I am still posting on the Pre-Diagnosis list. I was certain (and told by MD) that I have it . . .

Anyway, here's my question for today:

I tested very positive on the initial blood test (for IgA and TTG IgA). By the time I got in to see the GI (at an actual Celiac Center) I had already been somewhat "gluten light" and definitely gluten free for 10 days. He ordered a blood test for that day and an endoscopy for two days later. Told me to go home and eat gluten (2 days) until the endoscopy. He felt confident that 10 days would not make a difference.

Well the blood test came back negative (but I haven't actually seen it and don't even know which tests were done) and the endoscopy came back negative.

I am now doing a three month gluten challenge and go back to be re-tested in May.

I know the three month number is sort of arbitrary - no one really knows how long it takes. My question is: Have any of you tested positive after a SHORTER gluten challenge? If all my symptoms are back (4 weeks now) then wouldn't that mean there has to be something that would show up in my blood? (I don't think I'm even going to bother with the 2nd endoscopy if the blood test is positive again. That will be enough for me.)

I am hoping MD will agree to check again at 6 weeks just in case . . . I'd love to not have to wait the entire time to go gluten free for good.

Thanks (again) for any insights you guys can share.

Cara


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Cara in Boston Enthusiast

Really? No one?

Has anyone had their doctor tell them a shorter time for the gluten challenge? Different books I have read say "several weeks", "a couple of months" and "three month minimum."

I can't imagine my little 10 day trial of being gluten free would take so long to reverse.

Really, I'm just being hopeful that things will happen much quicker and I can get started feeling better soon. I am fantasizing about a summer with my kids where I have the energy to take them on all sorts of adventures and we don't have to worry if there are bathrooms available everywhere we go.

Also, I just very impatient.

Cara

Darn210 Enthusiast

Only have a slightly relevent story to share . . . One of my daughter's docs wanted her to do a gluten challenge for two months. If symptoms returned prior to the end of the two months then the challenge was over and no blood test required...the return of the symptoms was diagnostic in itself. We did an accidental challenge when she had a product a school that was originally gluten free but the vendor had changed and the new product contained wheat. Her challenge was over in one day. Does your doc know that your symptoms have returned? He may not require you to finish the challenge.

heather Goble Rookie

Only have a slightly relevent story to share . . . One of my daughter's docs wanted her to do a gluten challenge for two months. If symptoms returned prior to the end of the two months then the challenge was over and no blood test required...the return of the symptoms was diagnostic in itself. We did an accidental challenge when she had a product a school that was originally gluten free but the vendor had changed and the new product contained wheat. Her challenge was over in one day. Does your doc know that your symptoms have returned? He may not require you to finish the challenge.

Did your daughter ever have tests done? Just wondering if the doctor made the diagnosis on gluten challenge alone. I'm in a similar situation, went gluten free for a month, but now have reactions when I eat it. But in hindsight, should have waited to go gluten free so I could have been tested.

Darn210 Enthusiast

Yes, my daughter had a prior positive blood test. The doctor that wanted to challenge her was the doc we went to for a second opinion (because we were in major denial). In addition, we went to him for a while after her original doctor moved away. He wanted to challenge her because he has a different testing/diagnosis protocol than the original doc. I wasn't even sure I wanted to challenge her. At a minimum, I wanted to wait till she was older (she was 6 at the time) so that she could give me better feedback on how she felt. As it turned out, it wasn't my doing anyway and there wasn't any problem with interpreting her response/symptoms from eating wheat.

Additional extenuating circumstances that muddied the waters of her original diagnosis . . . she had the stomach flu a couple of days prior to her endoscopy. Her blood panel was drawn on the same day as her endoscopy . . . the doc really thought she had EE and that was what the endoscopy was for. She had two biopsies of the small intestine taken just because he was in the neighborhood so to speak. He told me afterwards that if he was actually doing biopsies for Celiac, he would have taken a lot more. The biopsies were officially negative for visual damage. However, the biopsies showed a generalized disaccharidase deficiency. That was a test that showed that not only was her lactase enzyme low (lactose intolerant) but all the other enzymes they tested were low as well . . . these were/are the enzymes produced in the tips of the villi. Doc called it a "smoking gun" and basically said we caught it before a lot of damage was done. Also, FWIW . . . I had asked for the lactase test (disaccharidase test). I don't think it is normally done.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,159
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Laz
    Newest Member
    Laz
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Oldturdle
      It is just so sad that health care in the United States has come to this.  Health insurance should be available to everyone, not just the healthy or the rich.  My heart goes out to you.  I would not hesitate to have the test and pay for it myself.  My big concern would be how you could keep the results truly private.  I am sure that ultimately, you could not.  A.I. is getting more and more pervasive, and all data is available somewhere.  I don't know if you could give a fake name, or pay for your test with cash.  I certainly would not disclose any positive results on a private insurance application.  As I understand it, for an official diagnosis, an MD needs to review your labs and make the call.  If you end up in the ER, or some other situation, just request a gluten free diet, and say it is because you feel better when you don't eat gluten.      Hang in there, though.  Medicare is not that far away for you, and it will remove a lot of stress from your health care concerns.  You will even be able to "come out of the closet" about being Celiac!
    • plumbago
      Yes, I've posted a few times about two companies: Request a Test and Ulta Labs. Also, pretty much we can all request any test we want (with the possible exception of the N protein Covid test and I'm sure a couple of others) with Lab Corp (or Pixel by Lab Corp) and Quest. I much prefer Lab Corp for their professionalism, ease of service and having it together administratively, at least in DC. And just so you know, Request a Test uses Lab Corp and Quest anyway, while Ulta Labs uses only Quest. Ulta Labs is cheaper than Request a Test, but I am tired of dealing with Quest, so I don't use them so much.
    • Scott Adams
      PS - I think you meant this site, but I don't believe it has been updated in years: http://glutenfreedrugs.com/ so it is best to use: You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
    • trents
      A lot to think about here. Does anyone have any recommendations for third party laboratories that will do full panel celiac screens private pay in the U.S.?
    • Scott Adams
      You don't need an official diagnosis to request a gluten-free diet in either a hospital or nursing home--this can be requested by anyone. The higher costs associated with existing conditions for life insurance is a reality, and regardless of your politics, it could become a reality again for health insurance in the USA. For many this could make health insurance unaffordable, thus, everyone who is undiagnosed should understand such potential consequences before they go the official diagnostic route. As mentioned, once it's on your medical record, it won't go away.
×
×
  • Create New...