Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Importance Of Biopsys


Guest GITRDONE

Recommended Posts

Guest GITRDONE

I have read under various topics that alot of you have choosen not to get a biopsy. So I'am wondering how do you know if your intestines are healing and/or do not have any permenant damage? And when should you go back to the doc for another endoscopy??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

tTG and EMA blood tests are the specific ones for detecting damage. Doctors test usually after 6 months to see if the levels have gone down. Usually 3-6 months gluten free will heal damage.If you have not gotten a biopsy and had just positive blood tests then whatever tests were positive should be followed up on to see if levels of them went down. Blood tests are used to measure compliance of the diet.

ianm Apprentice

I have never had any of the celiac tests so I don't know for sure what is happening in my gut. What I do know is that I was extremely sick, tired and overweight. I stopped eating gluten and my life underwent a drastic transformation for the better. I don't want any of the tests because I can't afford to get that sick again. I have turned my life around and can't afford to mess it up again. Plus I am a single parent and my son needs me to be as healthy as I possibly can. The gluten free diet is all I can do any way so for me it just isn't worth it to get tested.

Guest nini

I only had blood tests. No biopsy. I too was very very ill prior to the blood tests definitively dx me with celiac. I don't need to know what's going on in my gut, my general health is so much better than it was. It's not worth it to me to go through a biopsy when I already know what is wrong with me and what fixes it. I personally don't feel that biopsies are necessary.

Carriefaith Enthusiast

Every doctor seems to diagnose and deal with celiac disease differently. To diagnose, some just do blood tests, some do blood tests and a biopsy, and few still do the dietary challenge but it has been done.

In my opinon, I don't think that a follow up biopsy is necessay if you are following the diet and feeling better. Very rarely celiacs can get refactory celiac disease where the intestine doesn't heal, that's why I think follow up biopsies are important if you aren't feeling better on the diet.

frenchiemama Collaborator

I was diagnosed through bloodwork. My doctor offered to set up a biopsy if I wanted it, but I decided not to. For one thing, the course of treatment doesn't change based on the results of the biopsy. So it would really be telling me only what I already knew, that I have celiac disease. We decided that if I wasn't feeling better in 3 months that I would have one, but I am feeling better and still don't really see the point.

lovegrov Collaborator

Biopsy diagnosis is still the gold standard and it can also be used to check for any other possible problems. But most doctors don't think a followup biopsy is necessary unless you continue to have problems.

richard


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



julie5914 Contributor

I wanted a diagnosis, and I would have done it if my doctor wanted it for diagnosis. They diagnosed based on blood tests alone though since they were so high and since I had the EMA positive. I was happy because I felt like they were right, I didn't want to wait anymore to start the diet, and it saved me time and money to not have to do the procedure. They will be checking the blood levels in 3 months to check up on me, but I already feel a million times better.

Guest nini

Richard, according to the latest info I had read, the biopsy is NO LONGER THE GOLD STANDARD. The treatment is the same whether you are dx with blood tests alone, blood tests and biopsy, or dietary challenge...

Pegster Apprentice

My GI Doc also said that the intestinal biopsy was the best diagnostic tool for celiac disease. When she told me this, I had already been gluten-free for six months after a positive biopsy for DH. I asked her why she felt another biopsy would be necessary since I was already on a gluten-free diet. She basically said it was so I could know I have celiac disease "for sure". I decided then that maybe she didn't know as much as the people on this site so I turned down the biopsy. Now I see that maybe I should have one just to check for healing or damage--even though I've been gluten-free for 15 months now. Any thoughts? :blink:

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Biopsies have been considered the gold standard for diagnosis but that is changing. Blood tests are becoming more sophisticated. The tTG test will be taking place of biopsies in kids coming up in the near future.

Pegster-usually they will want to do a followup 6 months later to see if damage has healed if you had a biopsy to diagnose you.

Diagnosis from blood tests they will do the ones that showed up positive 6 months later to see if levels went down. This is how they test for compliance with the diet.

celiac3270 Collaborator

How is it not still the gold standard? The EMA isn't going to replace it anytime soon, and the tTG, though good, is not yet at a point where it can fully replace the biopsy.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

It is still considered the gold standard but that will be changing in the near future.

My GI doctor said " biopsies are so last year" lol...he said that there are better ways for diagnosis without being invasive. I think this will be something that happens in the near future. In some cases biopsies are good when in question though. I am not downplaying biopsies because they can be very useful

Guest nini

I can't find it right now, but I read several medical journals recently that stated that Biopsies were no longer the gold standard because the diagnostic protocols are changing for celiac. People are presenting with symptoms that are NOT classic celiac symptoms and the biopsies are overlooking gluten intolerance and the genetic predisposition to celiac which leads to full blown celiac damage. In a lot of cases patients have no noticeable damage to the intestines YET, but the more specific blood tests are confirming EARLY Celiac. Why wait till damage is done or is so severe before dx a patient with celiac, when the blood tests clearly show the propensity for this? In children especially, most are too young for a biopsy to show any damage, and even if blood tests are inconclusive, when put on a gluten-free diet the patients respond "miraculously". The risks of an invasive procedure like a biopsy, although small, are still present, such as perforation of the intestinal wall or other such complications.

The medical community is making great strides in celiac research, however, there are so many Dr.s out there still unwilling to dx celiac if someone presents with symptoms other than the classic celiac symptoms. In my case, I was Overweight (despite not being able to keep food in me) and I was initially told it couldn't be Celiac because you ONLY LOSE weight with it. So also, Dr.s are still clinging to the outdated notion that biopsies are the only way to positively dx celiac.

When is a biopsy useful? When Celiac is suspected because of blood or fecal screenings, the diet has been implemented for at least 3 months and there is NO positive dietary response.

Guest GITRDONE

YOU ARE ALL AWESOME WHEN IT COMES TO INFORMATION & VALID OPINIONS. SORRY I HAVEN'T RESPONDED EARLIER. MY COMPUTER WAS BEING UNCOPORATIVE

OK, SO MAYBE NOT A BIOPSY, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ENDYSCOPE??? I WAS MISDX FOR 15+ YEARS. WHEN THEY DID THE FIRST BIOPSY THEY SAID I HAD "COMPLETLY FLAT INTESTINES, WITH NO VISIBLE VILLIA". SO WITH THIS IN MIND, WILL A gluten-free DIET HEAL THE INTESTINES 100%???

:huh: SUSAN

Carriefaith Enthusiast
I HAD "COMPLETLY FLAT INTESTINES, WITH NO VISIBLE VILLIA". SO WITH THIS IN MIND, WILL A gluten-free DIET HEAL THE INTESTINES 100%???
A very strict gluten free diet will result in healing of the villi in the small intestine. Only in very rare cases the villi cannot heal.
Guest nini

Susan, how are your symptoms when you are on the gluten-free diet? Are you feeling better? Is your health improving?

If it is, then that is a pretty good indicator that the villi are healing... If your health hasn't improved at all, and you are 100% gluten-free, then you may want to have another endoscope/biopsy to see what's going on. BUT... if you are feeling better I don't see a reason to do a follow up biopsy. And my Dr. said that a biopsy would only be necessary if I did not get better on the gluten-free diet.

Guest GITRDONE

Yes I do feel much better when on a gluten free diet. I have also noticed that when I am exposed that I experince all the symptoms that have mentioned under other topics (fog brain, vomiting, dizzy, the big D, etc). It also seems that the longer you are gluten-free, the harder it hits you when glutened.

Thanks for your comments. Its great to have you guys out there and to know you are not alone.

:) Susan

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - suek54 replied to suek54's topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      5

      Awaiting dermatitis herpetiformis confirmation following biopsy

    2. - trents replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

    3. - catnapt replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

    4. - trents replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

    5. - catnapt posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,256
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Christie Fassel
    Newest Member
    Christie Fassel
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • suek54
      Thank you all for your advice and the dermatitis herpetiformis article. The latter made me realise I had stopped taking my antihistamine, which I will restart today. The Dapsone has cleared the rash entirely but I still get quite a bit itching, absolutely nothing to see though. I know its notoriously hard to clear and its still relatively early days for me.  The iodine issue is very interesting. I do eat quite a bit of salt because I have Addison's disease and sodium retention is an issue. I also have autoimmune hypothyroidism, not sure how a low iodine diet would play into that? Because of my Addison's I am totally steroid dependent, I take steroids 4 x daily and cannot mount any defence against inflammation. I need to increase my meds for that. Now that I know what is wrong I can do just that if Im having a bad day. Life is very sweet, just so damn complicated sometimes! Hey ho, onwards. Thank you again for your advice.  
    • trents
      So, essentially all of the nutrition in the food we eat is absorbed through the villous lining of the small bowel. This is the section of the intestinal track that is damaged by celiac disease. This villous lining is composed of billions of finger-like projections that create a huge amount of surface area for absorbing nutrients. For the celiac person, when gluten is consumed, it triggers an autoimmune reaction in this area which, of course, generates inflammation. The antibodies connected with this inflammation is what the celiac blood tests are designed to detect but this inflammation, over time, wears down the finger-like projections of the villous lining. Of course, when this proceeds for an extended period of time, greatly reduces the absorption efficiency of the villous lining and often results in many and various nutrient deficiency-related health issues. Classic examples would be osteoporosis and iron deficiency. But there are many more. Low D3 levels is a well-known celiac-caused nutritional deficiency. So is low B12. All the B vitamins in fact. Magnesium, zinc, etc.  Celiac disease can also cause liver inflammation. You mention elevated ALP levels. Elevated liver enzymes over a period of 13 years was what led to my celiac diagnosis. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes normalized. I had elevated AST and ALT. The development of sensitivities to other food proteins is very common in the celiac population. Most common cross reactive foods are dairy and oats but eggs, soy and corn are also relatively common offenders. Lactose intolerance is also common in the celiac population because of damage to the SB lining.  Eggs when they are scrambled or fried give me a gut ache. But when I poach them, they do not. The steam and heat of poaching causes a hydrolysis process that alters the protein in the egg. They don't bother me in baked goods either so I assume the same process is at work. I bought a plastic poacher on Amazon to make poaching very easy. All this to say that many of the issues you describe could be caused by celiac disease. 
    • catnapt
      thank you so much for your detailed and extremely helpful reply!! I can say with absolute certainty that the less gluten containing products I've eaten over the past several years, the better I've felt.   I wasn't avoiding gluten, I was avoiding refined grains (and most processed foods) as well as anything that made me feel bad when I ate it. It's the same reason I gave up dairy and eggs- they make me feel ill.  I do have a bit of a sugar addiction lol so a lot of times I wasn't sure if it was the refined grains that I was eating - or the sugar. So from time to time I might have a cookie or something but I've learned how to make wonderful cookies and golden brownies with BEANS!! and no refined sugar - I use date paste instead. Pizza made me so ill- but I thought it was probably the cheese. I gave up pizza and haven't missed it. the one time I tried a slice I felt so bad I knew I'd never touch it again. I stopped eating wheat pasta at least 3 yrs ago- just didn't feel well after eating it. I tried chick pea pasta and a few others and discovered I like the brown rice pasta. I still don't eat a lot of pasta but it's nice for a change when I want something easy. TBH over the years I've wondered sometimes if I might be gluten intolerant but really believed it was not possible for me to have celiac disease. NOW I need to know for sure- because I'm in the middle of a long process of trying to find out why I have a high parathyroid level (NOT the thyroid- but rather the 4 glands that control the calcium balance in your body) I have had a hard time getting my vit D level up, my serum calcium has run on the low side of normal for many years... and now I am losing calcium from my bones and excreting it in my urine (some sort of renal calcium leak) Also have a high ALP since 2014. And now rapidly worsening bone density.  I still do not have a firm diagnosis. Could be secondary HPT (but secondary to what? we need to know) It could be early primary HPT. I am spilling calcium in my urine but is that caused by the high parathyroid hormone or is it the reason my PTH is high>? there are multiple feedback loops for this condition.    so I will keep eating the bread and some wheat germ that does not seem to bother me too much (it hasn't got enough gluten to use just wheat germ)    but I'm curious- if you don't have a strong reaction to a product- like me and wheat germ- does that mean it's ok to eat or is it still causing harm even if you don't have any obvious symptoms? I guess what you are saying about silent celiac makes it likely that you can have no symptoms and still have the harm... but geez! you'd think they'd come up with a way to test for this that didn't require you to consume something that makes you sick! I worry about the complications I've been reading about- different kinds of cancers etc. also wondering- are there degrees of celiac disease?  is there any correlation between symptoms and the amnt of damage to your intestines? I also need a firm diagnosis because I have an identical twin sister ... so if I have celiac, she has it too- or at least the genetic make up for having it. I did have a VERY major stress to my body in 2014-2016 time frame .. lost 50lbs in a short period of time and had severe symptoms from acute protracted withdrawal off an SSRI drug (that I'd been given an unethically high dose of, by a dr who has since lost his license)  Going off the drug was a good thing and in many ways my health improved dramatically- just losing 50lbs was helpful but I also went  off almost a dozen different medications, totally changed my diet and have been doing pretty well except for the past 3-4 yrs when the symptoms related to the parathyroid issue cropped up. It is likely that I had low vit D for some time and that caused me a lot of symptoms. The endo now tells me that low vit D can be caused by celiac disease so I need to know for sure! thank you for all that great and useful information!!! 
    • trents
      Welcome, @catnapt! The most recent guidelines are the daily consumption of a minimum of 10g of gluten (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks. But if possible stretching that out even more would enhance the chances of getting valid test results. These guidelines are for those who have been eating gluten free for a significant amount of time. It's called the "gluten challenge".  Yes, you can develop celiac disease at any stage of life. There is a genetic component but also a stress trigger that is needed to activate the celiac genes. About 30-40% of the general population possesses the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% of the general population actually develop celiac disease. For most with the potential, the triggering stress event doesn't happen. It can be many things but often it is a viral infection. Having said that, it is also the case that many, many people who eventually are diagnosed with celiac disease probably experienced the actual onset years before. Many celiacs are of the "silent" type, meaning that symptoms are largely missing or very minor and get overlooked until damage to the small bowel lining becomes advanced or they develop iron deficiency anemia or some other medical problem associated with celiac disease. Many, many are never diagnosed or are diagnosed later in life because they did not experience classic symptoms. And many physicians are only looking for classic symptoms. We now know that there are over 200 symptoms/medical problems associated with celiac disease but many docs are only looking for things like boating, gas, diarrhea. I certainly understand your concerns about not wanting to damage your body by taking on a gluten challenge. Your other option is to totally commit to gluten free eating and see if your symptoms improve. It can take two years or more for complete healing of the small bowel lining once going gluten free but usually people experience significant improvement well before then. If their is significant improvement in your symptoms when going seriously gluten free, then you likely have your answer. You would either have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • catnapt
      after several years of issues with a para-gland issue, my endo has decided it's a good idea for me to be tested for celiac disease. I am 70 yrs old and stunned to learn that you can get celiac this late in life. I have just gradually stopped eating most foods that contain gluten over the past several years- they just make me feel ill- although I attributed it to other things like bread spiking blood sugar- or to the things I ate *with* the bread or crackers etc   I went to a party in Nov and ate a LOT of a vegan roast made with vital wheat gluten- as well as stuffing, rolls and pie crust... and OMG I was so sick! the pain, the bloating, the gas, the nausea... I didn't think it would ever end (but it did) and I was ready to go the ER but it finally subsided.   I mentioned this to my endo and now she wants me to be tested for celiac after 2 weeks of being on gluten foods. She has kind of flip flopped on how much gluten I should eat, telling me that if the symptoms are severe I can stop. I am eating 2-3 thin slices of bread per day (or english muffins) and wow- it does make me feel awful. But not as bad as when I ate that massive amnt of vital wheat gluten. so I will continue on if I have to... but what bothers me is - if it IS celiac, it seems stupid for lack of a better word, to intentionally cause more damage to my body... but I am also worried, on the other hand, that this is not a long enough challenge to make the blood work results valid.   can you give me any insight into this please?   thank you
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.