Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Question For You?


arkoflove

Recommended Posts

arkoflove Apprentice

Hi there,

2 years ago my PCP diagnosed me with Celiac due to my blood test results being 'equivical' and having a good response to going off gluten. At the time I was not 100% gluten free, but was on a low carb, thus lower gluten diet. I couldn't help but wonder at the time if my tests would have been a definitive positive if I had been consuming more gluten.

I went off hgluten for a time, and when I began to feel better I ate it agin because I kept being told that blood tests aren't the gold standard and I would need an edoscopy, and I must not have it.

I was fine for a time, for 3 months plus an entire pregnancy. After that my issues started up again.

This month I went to see a GI, looking for possible IBD. No IBD was found with both a colonoscopy and MRI. A celiac blood draw was done for TTG. My value was 3. Under 5 was considered negative, 5-8 equivocal, and 8+ positive. I had been gluten free for 6 months. My doc and I discussed the need to be on gluten before the test, but we decided to run it anyway. I can't help but wonder why I am even producing TTG 6 months after stopping gluten, and if it actually indicates that it would have been positive 6 months ago?

It's hard not having a definate answer. What do you think?

-Megan


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced

Hi there,

2 years ago my PCP diagnosed me with Celiac due to my blood test results being 'equivical' and having a good response to going off gluten. At the time I was not 100% gluten free, but was on a low carb, thus lower gluten diet. I couldn't help but wonder at the time if my tests would have been a definitive positive if I had been consuming more gluten.

I went off hgluten for a time, and when I began to feel better I ate it agin because I kept being told that blood tests aren't the gold standard and I would need an edoscopy, and I must not have it.

I was fine for a time, for 3 months plus an entire pregnancy. After that my issues started up again.

This month I went to see a GI, looking for possible IBD. No IBD was found with both a colonoscopy and MRI. A celiac blood draw was done for TTG. My value was 3. Under 5 was considered negative, 5-8 equivocal, and 8+ positive. I had been gluten free for 6 months. My doc and I discussed the need to be on gluten before the test, but we decided to run it anyway. I can't help but wonder why I am even producing TTG 6 months after stopping gluten, and if it actually indicates that it would have been positive 6 months ago?

It's hard not having a definate answer. What do you think?

-Megan

The tTg test will never be zero, which is why there is a range given for normal. I do not know what your original tTg numbers were when diagnosed but they must have been elevated for a doctor to diagnose you with Celiac. If you had continued to consume gluten on a regular basis, then your blood work most certainly would have been higher. It would naturally lower even on a lower gluten diet.

As far as the "Gold Standard" is concerned, that is a term penned by the AMA and you do not have to have a biopsy to prove Celiac. If your Celiac blood panel was elevated on one or more tests, you have a problem with gluten and should stop eating it. You proved this with a dietary trial so don't let the doctors put doubts in your head, unless you want to eat gluten again for more testing. You have to have active Celiac for awhile and eat a lot of gluten to produce enough damage to be seen on the scope. Are you willing to go that far to have a definitive diagnosis to convince yourself?

jenngolightly Contributor

The tTg test will never be zero, which is why there is a range given for normal.

It might be zero if you have IGA, IGG, or IGE antibody deficiencies like I do.

Gemini Experienced

It might be zero if you have IGA, IGG, or IGE antibody deficiencies like I do.

I think the original poster was referring to those who do not have IgA deficiency, which would make a biopsy or dietary trial your only option. It is possible to bring those down close to zero even if you were diagnosed by blood work and not deficient.....at least the IgA/IgG. Mine were 1 at last testing butI have been gluten-free for 6 years.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,100
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    David mucciariello
    Newest Member
    David mucciariello
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Normal vitamin D range us from 20 ng/ml to 100 ng/ml.  200 nmol/L is the same as 80ng/ml. Minimum vitamin D is based soley on preventing Rickets and osteomyelitis.  Othe research is considered irrelevant insufficnet proof.   My 25(OH)D level is just over 80 ng/dl.  It took 8 years of 10,000 IU a day to get here because Celiac Disease causes low D.  In 1952 the UK banned all vitamin D supplementation due to a error.  Most of the world followed suit.  In the western world vitamin D deficiency ranges from 40% of the US to 60% in the UK. If you had an office with workspace for 30 to 100 workers, but you were restricted to less than 50 workers, how well would the office run.? A factory worker has 40 ng/ml,  A lifeguard has around 80.  Who's immune system works better? Simultaneously, 1,25(OH)2D3 up- and downregulates more than 1000 genes responsible for cellular proliferation, differentiation, a variety of cellular metabolic activities, antiangiogenesis and apoptosis   https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9919777/      
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Mpanknin! Questions like that really have no definite answer. Even if you tested a container of it for gluten content, the test results would only be good for that production batch. Assume it has some degree of CC. A more important question might be, how sensitive are you to minor amounts of gluten exposure? 
    • Yvonne Ayers Albers
      I have Celiac, and I just found out that HCTZ has gluten in it, and also makes you severely constipated versus diarrrhea!!  I need another medicene for blood pressure that is certified gluten free, without the 20 ppm, and doesn't cause constipation, please!!
    • sillyac58
      Thanks Wheatwacked. My D is normal. I take B12, B6, and a bone health supplement (I'm 67) that has K1, Calcium, Magnesium, and a bunch of other things. But no thiamine. But I will have my doc add it to my next blood draw. Thanks for the info WW!  
    • Mpanknin
      Wondering if this is gluten free or not. The only ingredients show garlic. Nothing about where it's processed if there's cross-contamination etc. Anybody know?
×
×
  • Create New...