Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I've Been Duped


JenHarris

Recommended Posts

JenHarris Apprentice

SO unbelievably frustrated and so mad I could scream right now. My doctor shouldn't even be a doctor!! I had an upper GI done two weeks ago and just found out my 'Baylor and Mayo- accredited' doctor only took 3 biopsies, and now all he wants to do is put me on a year's worth of Omeprazole and apparently call it a day. This is a load of $&*+!!!! I got a one paragraph explanation of findings in the mail (benign biopsy findings), and no explanation of what could be causing my ulcers or esophageal damage, or the bowel inflammation that was found during the scope. And no mention of the need to schedule a follow-up.

Is this a joke?! Has anybody else dealt with this? I just don't know what to do anymore. Is it worth pursuing further testing or should I just forget it and stick to going gluten-free?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Authentic Foods
Tierra Farm



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Lakefront Brewery


Marilyn R Community Regular

Personally, I'd forego other testing unless you have other medical issues that go unresolved.

I am undiagnosed gluten intolerant person with a family history of celiac disease.

I talked to an Internal Medicine doctor yesterday trained at the U of Miami. After I gave her a brief description of before/after gluten-free scenario, she told me "You have celiac disease".

When I told her that technically, I can't say that, because my biopsy was negative, she nodded and smiled. She didn't SAY that it's a matter of interpretation or linguistics, but that's how I interpretted it.

"If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it's a duck". (I'm usually not good at quotes, so if I misquoted, my apologies.)

Skylark Collaborator

Sometimes doctors make you want to scream! Go gluten-free, see it it helps. This is a common sense diet and if it's the problem you don't need much help from doctors anyway.

JenHarris Apprentice

Oh, I know that going gluten-free will solve it... it's just that I'd really like to have a firm diagnosis for tax purposes so we can write off some of the food cost, and for my piece of mind after years of unexplained symptoms. My son has Cystic Fibrosis and Short Bowel Syndrome so we pay through the nose for his medical expenses (just for meds and regular doctor visits on a good month, we pay $300- and that's with insurance... on a bad month, we can pay $600 or more).

And the fact that my son seems to be gluten sensitive too means we will be transitioning to a gluten-free household so I can prevent cross contamination. Eventually I'll be getting rid of all of our wheat-based flours and getting rid of all of our pasta and bread that is not gluten free since my husband is the only one left in the household who isn't gluten-sensitive. Thank you for the sympathy/empathy. It does mean a lot to know that there are other people going through the same frustrations. :)

Skylark Collaborator

Oh, wow. With those medical expenses I can see why you'd want to write off the extra cost of gluten-free food. I don't meet the cutoff to deduct medical expenses (fortunately).

Three biopsies is really standard, as stupid as it sounds. I take it you had a negative celiac panel? It could be that you are non-celiac gluten intolerant but there's no ICD9 code for that. Maybe you can get a good family practice doc to diagnose you based no response to the diet so you can get the tax writeoff.

Did you get the actual biopsy report? A lot of times lymphocytic infiltration will be mentioned in the pathology report but the doctors don't consider it celiac. I don't know if it would help as far as diagnosis, but it might help your peace of mind.

heather Goble Rookie

I had a similar situation. Negative blood work, negative biopsy. I had been gluten free for a littlemorethan a month when the GI suggested the tests. He told me to eat gluten for 3 days prior and that should be enough. He only took 2 biopsies when I had my endoscopy. I then had a follow up with a physician assistant who said he couldnt believe my results were negative based on my symptoms. He said to just assume I have celiac. Even he did not seem knowledgable enough about it. So did I get a diagnosis? Not really! It can be frustrating. I went gluten free the day of my endoscopy and never looked back. I was miserable the small amount of time I had to go back to eating gluten for the biopsy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Food for Life



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,590
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BeccaShu
    Newest Member
    BeccaShu
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Skout Organic


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Skout Organic



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...