Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Waiting (Not So) Patiently For Results


kameelham

Recommended Posts

kameelham Newbie

Hello Celiac experts! I've started on the path of diagnosis and while i wait for the results of what I hope is my last test I was hoping you all could give me your expert opinions.

A little over a month ago I was having severe pain in my esophagus so I went to my primary doctor. She wasn't sure about the cause but was concerned so I was sent to a GI and ordered a series of blood tests one of which was for Celiac. The GI suspected an esophagus ulcer caused my one of my medications and we proceded with an endoscopy just to be sure. He was right, there was a large ulcer, he also told me after the procedure that he noticed my small intestins looked "grainy" and he had taken biopsies to test for Celiac. I didn't think much of it until the next week when my doctors office called to tell me that my blood work levels had come back high, but not definitive (not sure exactly which test this was) and recommended I follow up with the GI. Well, I thankfully had already had a biopsy done, so i figured I'd just wait to hear what that said. Two weeks went by with no news so I called the GI who then told me that the biopsy was negative, but he had just seen the blood test results and wanted to do more blood work and a genealogy test. A few weeks later GI says I have the genetic markers present and slightly higher levels then before on the blood work (again, not sure which test this was). My doctor seemed to think that I had a false negative on the biopsy and that most likely I do indeed have Celiac, however before giving me an official diagnosis he wanted to do a capsule endoscopy! So, that happened a week ago and I am now waiting for a call on those results.

I've never thought about Celiac until now and I have to say the more I read about the symptoms the more sense it seems to make. I've had bloating, gas, fatigue, skin problems, anxiety, knee aches, migraines, and a history of stomach problems, including cyclical vomiting (though I haven't found anything linking the two) with no real solution.

My question to you is, does this seem consistant with the false negatives and sometimes non-clear cut diagnosis of Celiac?

Thanks for any thoughts you may have! I'm new to this and trying to gather as much information as possible.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Welcome. You don't need to wait on those results to start the diet. You had a positive blood test so you need the diet no matter what the endoscopic test shows. False negatives are common with both blood and biopsy but not false positives. Read as much as you can here and ask any questions you need to.

sa1937 Community Regular

Hello Celiac experts! I've started on the path of diagnosis and while i wait for the results of what I hope is my last test I was hoping you all could give me your expert opinions.

A little over a month ago I was having severe pain in my esophagus so I went to my primary doctor. She wasn't sure about the cause but was concerned so I was sent to a GI and ordered a series of blood tests one of which was for Celiac. The GI suspected an esophagus ulcer caused my one of my medications and we proceded with an endoscopy just to be sure. He was right, there was a large ulcer, he also told me after the procedure that he noticed my small intestins looked "grainy" and he had taken biopsies to test for Celiac. I didn't think much of it until the next week when my doctors office called to tell me that my blood work levels had come back high, but not definitive (not sure exactly which test this was) and recommended I follow up with the GI. Well, I thankfully had already had a biopsy done, so i figured I'd just wait to hear what that said. Two weeks went by with no news so I called the GI who then told me that the biopsy was negative, but he had just seen the blood test results and wanted to do more blood work and a genealogy test. A few weeks later GI says I have the genetic markers present and slightly higher levels then before on the blood work (again, not sure which test this was). My doctor seemed to think that I had a false negative on the biopsy and that most likely I do indeed have Celiac, however before giving me an official diagnosis he wanted to do a capsule endoscopy! So, that happened a week ago and I am now waiting for a call on those results.

I've never thought about Celiac until now and I have to say the more I read about the symptoms the more sense it seems to make. I've had bloating, gas, fatigue, skin problems, anxiety, knee aches, migraines, and a history of stomach problems, including cyclical vomiting (though I haven't found anything linking the two) with no real solution.

My question to you is, does this seem consistant with the false negatives and sometimes non-clear cut diagnosis of Celiac?

Thanks for any thoughts you may have! I'm new to this and trying to gather as much information as possible.

It's entirely possible that you have celiac. False negatives on either the blood test or biopsy are not uncommon. If your celiac panel came back high, I would say that's a positive...not sure why your doctor would say that's not definitive. As far as the biopsy is concerned, if damage is patchy and samples are taken in areas not damaged, it could early be interpreted as negative (and might be a false negative).

Make sure you pick up copies of all of these tests! The celiac panel always has a reference range, which varies from lab to lab. When you get a copy of that, post your results here and someone can help you interpret them.

Also, get a copy of your biopsy results...a pathologist has to examine those biopsies as damage is not usually visible to the naked eye.

It sounds like your doctor is being very thorough to find out what is causing your problems. When all celiac testing is done, you should give a gluten-free diet a strict try as you may find you do indeed have problems even if tests are inconclusive.

kameelham Newbie

So the doctor called back today with my capsule study results. He found some erosion farther down on in my intestines then the initial endoscopy went that is consistent with Celiac and gave me the options of going ahead and starting the diet or coming back in for a longer scope and more biopsies. I told him about my research the symptoms that I have had that seem to be related and he agreed that going gluten free and coming back for a follow up in the fall seemed to make the most sense as there was always the chance that more biopsies could still bring more false negatives.

I'm really thankful I was refereed to a doctor who seems to be so knowledgeable about Celiac. I'm feeling a little overwhelmed at starting the diet as it's now going to be a reality. I'll definitely be reading/posting here with questions!

kareng Grand Master

So the doctor called back today with my capsule study results. He found some erosion farther down on in my intestines then the initial endoscopy went that is consistent with Celiac and gave me the options of going ahead and starting the diet or coming back in for a longer scope and more biopsies. I told him about my research the symptoms that I have had that seem to be related and he agreed that going gluten free and coming back for a follow up in the fall seemed to make the most sense as there was always the chance that more biopsies could still bring more false negatives.

I'm really thankful I was refereed to a doctor who seems to be so knowledgeable about Celiac. I'm feeling a little overwhelmed at starting the diet as it's now going to be a reality. I'll definitely be reading/posting here with questions!

Nice to hear a good doctor story!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,076
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.