Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Does The Gene Test Mean?


paperbagprincess

Recommended Posts

paperbagprincess Rookie

My Mum and Uncle both have had positive blood tests then positive biopsy. I had the blood test done which was normal and gene test was positive. I was having stomach problems and b12 and foliate deficiencies (b12 injections and foliate tablets did nothing) . I'm a chicken and I was moving cities, so I decided I would trial a gluten free diet to see if it helps. That was 4 years ago, my b12 and foliate are normal. My GP and dietitian said that they thought I definitely had some damage to the villi because of the way my deficiencies went normal.

I'm just wonder, does anyone know any good websites that explain the gene test? Or any experience with it being positive, but negative Celiac test. My GP (who ran the test 4 years ago) said people with this positive gene are more likely to develop celiac disease and are more likely to be sensitive to gluten.

Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



adab8ca Enthusiast

My Mum and Uncle both have had positive blood tests then positive biopsy. I had the blood test done which was normal and gene test was positive. I was having stomach problems and b12 and foliate deficiencies (b12 injections and foliate tablets did nothing) . I'm a chicken and I was moving cities, so I decided I would trial a gluten free diet to see if it helps. That was 4 years ago, my b12 and foliate are normal. My GP and dietitian said that they thought I definitely had some damage to the villi because of the way my deficiencies went normal.

I'm just wonder, does anyone know any good websites that explain the gene test? Or any experience with it being positive, but negative Celiac test. My GP (who ran the test 4 years ago) said people with this positive gene are more likely to develop celiac disease and are more likely to be sensitive to gluten.

Thanks.

In short, blood tests can often have false negatives. Your GP is correct about the gene test in that if you have the gene, you can develop celiac but won't necessarily. If you have the genes, close relatives with celiac, symptoms of celiac (vitamin deficiencies likw B12 and folate) which resolve on a gluten-free diet, then chances are you have celiac.

beachbirdie Contributor

My Mum and Uncle both have had positive blood tests then positive biopsy. I had the blood test done which was normal and gene test was positive. I was having stomach problems and b12 and foliate deficiencies (b12 injections and foliate tablets did nothing) . I'm a chicken and I was moving cities, so I decided I would trial a gluten free diet to see if it helps. That was 4 years ago, my b12 and foliate are normal. My GP and dietitian said that they thought I definitely had some damage to the villi because of the way my deficiencies went normal.

I'm just wonder, does anyone know any good websites that explain the gene test? Or any experience with it being positive, but negative Celiac test. My GP (who ran the test 4 years ago) said people with this positive gene are more likely to develop celiac disease and are more likely to be sensitive to gluten.

Thanks.

Did they tell you whichgenes you had? There is such an array of them.

You can read some about the genes Open Original Shared Link, and in the table that is about halfway down the page you can click links to each separate DQ type.

The presence of the gene does not confirm a diagnosis, but it does point to a genetic predisposition to getting celiac. Your family history and positive response to being gluten free tell you a LOT. Sounds like healthy choice for you.

beachbirdie

Mari Contributor

I have found the Wikipedia articles easiest to understand search for HLA-DQ). The genetic marker tests - HLA-DQ reports list the results as the marker numbers. www.Enterolab.com only gives the results for the HLA-DQ B but other labs report the marker number of the HLA-DQ A and B. The A and B are subunits or alleles of the HLA DQ gene. We inherit one DQ gene from each parent, an A and a B. The report usually states whether a person has one or two main celiac markers.

An older test done by serology tests for the shape of the antigen binding site. Drs often prefer to use the terminology of this test. The Wiki article will tell you how to figure out how to tell whether you have a DQ1 thru DQ8 or DQ9 and there are individual articles for each HLA-DQ class.

My Enterolab results (DNA assay)

HLA DQ B 0302

HLA DQ B 0602

The 0302 is a main Celiac marker (often referred to as a gene)

The 0602 is a marker that put me at risk for developing non-celiac sprue ( a Leaky Gut Syndrome, not autoimmune)

The older terminology:

The 0302 translates to a HLA-DQ8

The 0602 translates to a HLA-DQ6

kledford Rookie

I have heard that there is an at home DNA "genetic" test that you can order, swab and send off for results and the cost is reasonable......I will try to get the name and post it for you. I have not used it myself but have considered it for my children to rule out celiac....their blood tests were negative at this time but I would like to know if they carry the gene instead of testing every couple of years.

kledford Rookie

www.cyrexlabs.com is one website I have read about on this forum....as well as Open Original Shared Link which i believe is affiliated via The University of Chicago.

paperbagprincess Rookie

Thanks everyone. I live in New Zealand so that sending the swab away thing is probably not available here. I'm not sure which of the gene tests I had done, the doctor just said it was positive. Thanks everyone.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.