Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With Food Labels


sarahw

Recommended Posts

sarahw Rookie

I have recently been diagnosed with celiac disease and have a question about food labels. Do companies have to specify whether or not a product is produced in a facility that also processes wheat? For example, I was looking at canned tomatoes tonight at Whole Foods. The Whole Foods brand specificies that their tomatoes are produced in a facility that also process wheat etc. but another brand I looked at does not specify either way. Does this mean they were produced in a gluten free facility or the company is just not putting a warning on their product? I just can't imagine that basic things like canned tomatoes etc. are something I have to worry about!! Any help is greatly appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ElseB Contributor

Depends what country you're in! Just to make things extra confusing for us Celiacs every country has different rules! Here in Canada, there are new labelling rules coming into force next year that require plain language labels that clearly identify priority allergens, gluten sources and sulphites. The only problem is that the rules only address ingredients intentionally added to food and not cross contamination. My understanding is that Health Canada is working on new rules now about the use of "may contain" statements since they're so confusing.

One strategy I use is to look at a bunch of products made by the same company to see if there's a "pattern" in their labelling. So if I see "traces of wheat" on one product, but not on another (of the same brand), then I assume its okay. Your best option though is to call the company. Its a pain, but its the best way to find out.

psawyer Proficient

The original post came from the United States (moderators know things).

The current "gluten-free" label rules in Canada, and the proposed updates, refer only to gluten in intentional ingredients. In the US, there are currently NO RULES.

"May contain" statements are voluntary in both jurisdictions. Canada does have some strongly written guidelines about precautionary statements.

"Shared facility" is not defined, other than what you would ordinarily think. When this VOLUNTARY disclosure is made, it means that somewhere in the same complex where the final production is done, there is an allergen.

The much talked about "gluten-free facility" is a myth. Even if no gluten is intentionally brought into the facility, contamination may occur there because humans work there and deliver things. The truck driver may have been to McDonalds for lunch and probably didn't wash AFTER eating their Big Mac. Even if she did, crumbs may remain on her clothes.

Almost every "gluten-free" facility buys ingredients from outside sources. Those facilities may or may not have intentional gluten somewhere in the plant. See above about human factors.

Bottom line for me: If there are no questionable ingredients, and no "may contain" statement, I don't worry.

BTW, if "shared facility" worries you, do not ever, ever eat in a restaurant, and make sure that nobody ever, ever brings a product containing gluten into your home.

Marilyn R Community Regular

That's a really good question! And I don't know the answer, but I've always been okay with canned tomatoes if the ingredients were safe. My instincts tell me it's optiona, only because I wanted to test corn tortillas rececently and was told that mission does them on a separate line. Mission doesn't print it on their packaging, and I don't believe that they're labeled gluten-free.

I worked in a canning factory when I was in my teens. I really don't think you need to worry about canned veggies being cc, based on my experience. But that was 30 years ago, so I could be wrong.

T.H. Community Regular

As was said, the 'processed in a facility with wheat' is a voluntary statement, not mandatory. The majority of companies have facilities that process foods with gluten somewhere in the facility, or possibly on the same line.

You're more likely to find a facility that doesn't have intentionally added gluten in the facility with companies that specialize, like sunmaid with raisins, or Heinz with tomato products.

Most celiacs do okay with food from shared facilities and lines, but every once in a while there'll be some oddball contamination sneak in. Most celiacs I know just kind of have a 'note to self' moment if they get glutened, and if it starts happening frequently after eating a particular product, then they might eliminate that product for a while and see how things go.

Since there is no legal regulation of the term gluten free here in the states, here's some info that can be useful.

No gluten ingredients means that a company hasn't added any gluten on purpose, but doesn't address whether gluten cross contamination might be an issue. Sometimes these foods are fine, sometimes they're not. They are less likely to be an issue if they are not grain based, or made in a company that has a lot of grain based products.

Naturally gluten free means that this product, in its natural state, is gluten free. This is for products where it is considered misleading to say 'gluten free,' because it implies that other products of the same type might normally have gluten. Like, say, calling one's broccoli gluten free. However, there are some products that this is being used for which can be a problem, because while the product is naturally gluten free, the harvesting/processing practices frequently result in gluten cross-contamination. This applies for many gluten-free grains, for example.

Gluten Free usually means a company is stating that their product contains at least less than 20 ppm of gluten (<20 mg of gluten/kg of food). However, how tested this is varies by company. Some companies test their products to confirm they are gluten free, some do not. Most have at least some protocols in place to try and prevent gluten cross contamination. Most of the companies that specialize solely in gluten-free food DO test.

There are a few grocery guides, like one from a place called cecelia's marketplace, which have lists of gluten free products, or regular products that are considered gluten-free. that can be a HUGE help in the beginning to pick between brands. :-)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,692
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda M Rush
    Newest Member
    Linda M Rush
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Gigi2025
      Since 2015 we've spent extensive time in Italy and I've been able to eat their wheat products without incident. Initially, I was practically starving thinking foods in Sicily were not gluten-free.  An Italian friend who had lived in the US for over 20 years said she had celiac/gluten-free friends from the US who could eat Italian wheat products without problems. Hesitantly, I tried little by little without issues.  A few years later at a market, I asked a bread vendor if they had gluten-free loaves. Turns out she had lived in LA, said groups believe it's not the gluten that's causing our bodies harm, but potassium bromate; these groups have been trying to ban it.  Bromines and other halogens wreaks havoc to our endocrine system and, more specifically, our thyroids and immune systems. When bromines are ingested/absorbed into the body, it displaces iodine causing other health issues. Potassium bromate is a powerful oxidizing agent (dough 'conditioner') that chemically changes flour to enhance elasticity, bleaches the dough, and ages the flour much faster than open air.   Shortly thereafter while visiting friends in California, one family said they had gone gluten-free and the difference was incredible. The reason they choose this path was due them (a biologist/chemist/agriculturist scientist) having to write a portion of a paper about a certain product for the company he worked. Another company's scientist was directed to write the other portion. All was confidential, they weren't allowed to know the other company/employee.  After the research, they learned gluten was being removed from wheat, sent elsewhere, returned in large congealed blocks resembling tofu, and then added to wheat products. Potassium bromate has been banned for use in Europe, China, and other countries, but not in the US. Then we have the issues of shelf preservatives and stabilizers. What are we eating?  Why? We spend long periods of time in Italy and all has been good.  We just returned from an extended time in Greece;  no issues there either.  There is a man there we learned about on a travel show about Greece who walks the hills, picking herbs, pods, etc.  He is a very learned scholar, taught at the university level in Melbourne. It took a few days to locate him, but were finally successful. He too, is concerned about the additives and preservatives in American food (many of his customers are Americans, haven't been in the best of health, and have become healthier after visiting him). He suggested taking a food product from the US and the same product in Europe, and compare the different ingredients. Then ask why these things are being allowed in the US by the 'watch dog' of our foods and drugs. It would be amuzing if it weren't tragic. I'm presently looking for flour from Europe that I can make my own bread and pasta as the gluten-free bread is now $7.99 a (small) loaf.  BTW, studies are showing that many gluten-free individuals are becoming diabetic. My guess is because the gluten-free products are high in carbs. This is only my experience and opinion garnished by my personal research.  I hope it helps.  
    • knitty kitty
      Symptoms that get worse if you don't supplement is a sign of malabsorption, possibly due to Celiac disease. Blood tests for nutritional deficiencies are not very accurate, and should be done when you have been off of supplements for eight to twelve weeks, otherwise the vitamin supplements you've taken will be measured.  The blood circulation system is a transportation system.  It transports the vitamins you've absorbed around the body, but blood tests don't give an accurate picture of the vitamin and mineral stores inside organs and tissues where they are actually used.  You can have "normal" blood levels but still have deficiencies.  This is because the brain demands stored nutrients be put into the blood stream to supply important organs, like the brain and heart, while other organs do without.   If you are taking Thiamine Mononitrate in your supplements, you are probably low in thiamine.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many supplements because it won't break down sitting on a shelf.  This also means Thiamine Mononitrate is difficult for the body to utilize.  Only thirty percent of Thiamine Mononitrate on the label is absorbed and even less is able to be utilized by the body.  A different form of Thiamine called Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing.   Talk to your doctor about doing a genetic test to look for Celiac markers.   I'm concerned that if you do a gluten challenge (10 grams of gluten per day for a minimum off two weeks) in your weakened state, the nutritional deficiencies will become worse and possibly life threatening.  
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Hello, good afternoon!   I apologize, I didn’t see a notification and I’m just reading this. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and the link. Yes you are absolutely right, even so trying to get a response from them has been extremely difficult. They don’t answer but I will your practice of “guilty until proven innocent.”   I like and have a sense of trust here in this website, everyone is honest and thoughts are raw. The mutual understanding is amazing!   thank you Scott!
    • Scott Adams
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.