Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does Quantity Matter?


Tanner's Mom

Recommended Posts

Tanner's Mom Newbie

Hello. I'm a mom of a child with newly diagnosed Celiac. The one question I can't seem to find an answer to is this: does the quantity of gluten my child is exposed to change the severity of the reaction? There is so much discussion about even a spec of gluten due to CC and people who report becoming very sick from this miniscule amount of gluten. If they're sick for two days from a spec of cross contamination then would it be exponentially worse if they ate an entire piece of wheat bread? I guess I don't really understand the way the body is reacting to the gluten if such a miniscule amount can cause such a profound reaction. Thank you for your input!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

Yes, and no.

We each have a threshold where the amount of gluten is such that it overtakes the body's ability to heal.

Small amounts of contact may or may not affect you. Do what you can to avoid them, but be practical.

If you have an accident, do not assume that more will not do more damage. Do not eat a slice of pizza because you discovered an uneaten crouton in your salad.

beebs Enthusiast

It does for me, if I have small amounts I can still feel it, and get symptoms. But if I have large amounts I get severely ill and last time ended up in emergency.

Takala Enthusiast

The longer one is off of gluten, if one is celiac or gluten intolerant, the more likely one is more sensitive to it. People who start out not reacting to "casual" levels of cross contamination, may be in for a big surprise a few years down the line of a gluten free diet.

On "tiny" amounts:

You can't even see viruses that cause the common cold or flu - but that does not mean that they are not capable of causing a physical reaction in your body. Once exposed, if it's the same line of germs, it is not going to cause a cold over and over again, unless it is a different strain that mutated. So you then get over it, after the body mounts a defense to try to get it out of you by running a temperature and making snot, and you're "immune" to that strain. You never get "immune" to a celiac or gluten intolerance reaction, once you're over one of them. The gluten doesn't change or adapt on its own, because it is a plant protein, and your body's reaction to it doesn't change. It doesn't say, well, we sure killed off that gluten before, so now we don't have to worry about it anymore. It is instead your immune system is going awry, lurking, and poised to go after your own tissues if it is accidentally turned "on" by the presence of the gluten invader, again.

Tanner's Mom Newbie

Thank you for your input, I appreciate the responses!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,688
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    sandyebel
    Newest Member
    sandyebel
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.