Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help Interpreting Test Results


Mrs. M.

Recommended Posts

Mrs. M. Apprentice

Hi-

I am brand new to this group. I recently had a blood test for gluten intolerance and the results came back as follows:

tissue transglutinaminase IgA 0.41 (standard <0.90)

tissue transglutinaminase IgG 1.41 (standard <0.90)

I asked my doctor what this meant and the reply was: you have celiac disease. You should start a gluten-free diet now. the end

In general I like my doctor but I was shocked by this response. Everything I have read about celiac disease says that the intestinal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis. Also, everything I read says that the IgG is used when the patient has overall IgA deficiency. I don't think I have this. I don't have severe symptoms. I was tested because of back pain. When I read about celiac disease, I can see a lot of symptoms that I have in a mild form.

I would love any opinions that people have for me as I wait to hear back from my doctor. Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



beachbirdie Contributor

Hi-

I am brand new to this group. I recently had a blood test for gluten intolerance and the results came back as follows:

tissue transglutinaminase IgA 0.41 (standard <0.90)

tissue transglutinaminase IgG 1.41 (standard <0.90)

I asked my doctor what this meant and the reply was: you have celiac disease. You should start a gluten-free diet now. the end

In general I like my doctor but I was shocked by this response. Everything I have read about celiac disease says that the intestinal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis. Also, everything I read says that the IgG is used when the patient has overall IgA deficiency. I don't think I have this. I don't have severe symptoms. I was tested because of back pain. When I read about celiac disease, I can see a lot of symptoms that I have in a mild form.

I would love any opinions that people have for me as I wait to hear back from my doctor. Thank you!

The IgG will give you good information whether or not you are IgA deficient. It's only those who are IgA deficient who need the IgG version of tests.

I'm surprised your doctor jumped so quickly to diagnosis. So many doctors will look at a positive blood test and still argue that a person is not celiac if they don't fit a certain "mold" or have all the symptoms...nice you don't have to argue with him/her.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You mentioned in your other post that you have started the diet and are feeling better. With that combined with positive blood work it sounds like you are one of us. Since the biopsy can have false negatives and positive blood work trumps negative biopsy I think you have a good doctor who caught this early.

Please note that if you do decide to do more tests you HAVE to be eating gluten. So if you are going to pursue more testing get back on gluten immediately. Your body may not like you doing that though.

Jsny1010 Rookie

In my limited experience the tTG IgG is Sensitive and Specific - all the blood tests are used because no one test will show positive in every patient. Depending on the severity of the damage biopsy results are a great way to confirm the diagnosis, but its not 100% that they will be able to see damage in cases where the celiac disease is in a juvenile form.

If your off gluten and feel better, most people will because it is healthier than it might be worth a shot trying to be gluten-free for a length of time to see if your back issues clear up, cant hurt.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,139
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kathleen apodaca
    Newest Member
    kathleen apodaca
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.