Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Going To The Doctor Tomorrow-What Test(S) Should I Have Done?


desperateforhealth

Recommended Posts

desperateforhealth Apprentice

About a month and a half ago I decided I was fed up with my stomach problems and did enough research to suspect gluten intolerance/celiac's, so I decided to go gluten free. My stomach is happier (although it might just be because I eat healthier now), but I've decided I'd like to get tested so that I can know for sure. I'm worried about people thinking my self-diagnosing isn't legit. Especially if I am still having problems, even if it's fewer than before.

So my question is... what test(s) should I request from my doctor so that I can know if I have gluten problems? Obviously I am particularly interested in ones that don't require you to have gluten IN your system, but I am also worried about price. Any advice and information is very much appreciated.

Thank you so much for your help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

Unfortunately both blood tests and endoscopy/biopsy require you to have gluten in your system.

If you are looking for a Celiac Disease diagnosis, you will have to go back on gluten (some say a substantial amount of gluten for a period of at least three weeks...my Celiac Doc told me a month).

Since you are gluten-free, perhaps you should stay that way for a few months then decide if it is worth the set-back for a diagnosis. Also at by then you may be ready for a gluten challenge to confirm for yourself that gluten is a problem for you.

desperateforhealth Apprentice

Thank you!

Do you think I need to wait a few more months before being able to tell if gluten was affecting me if I reintroduced it?

GottaSki Mentor

hard to say. You may find gluten bothers you after only a short time gluten-free.

The reason I suggest some time without gluten is to see if you have even more improvement to your health since you are already gluten-free.

There are no concrete formulas for celiac diagnosis - many have negative celiac panels and positive endos or vice versa.

The standard path is celiac panel/bloodwork followed by endoscopy with several samples taken of from different locations. Since you are already gluten-free - you'll have decide when you want to proceed with attempting to get an official dx which will require gluten in your diet for weeks prior to testing.

desperateforhealth Apprentice

That makes sense, thanks.

If the bloodwork is positive, why do people still have to get the endoscopy?

GottaSki Mentor

To confirm diagnosis - for many giving up gluten for life is not something they will do without an official dx. The endoscpy can also be helpful in determining the level of damage. Personally my damage was quite severe so I have had follow up endos.

Again you will find of full spectrum of paths that have led folks to the gluten-free life - some with official celiac or gluten intolerance dx / some without. Some have improved health without testing and don't feel they need a dx to stay gluten-free.

desperateforhealth Apprentice

Ah, yes. Thank you, that is quite helpful.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    2. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    3. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    4. - par18 replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,340
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Abbyyoung417
    Newest Member
    Abbyyoung417
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.