Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free-Now What?


Twoxxmom

Recommended Posts

Twoxxmom Rookie

I began cutting out gluten a little over 2 weeks ago. I may need to do more with skin care products, but I have done well with food. I was just wondering how long I should wait before considering other foods that might be causing a reaction (rashes). It seems as though there might not be much left to eat if I excluded iodine and salicylate foods. How would one go about this? Should I give the gluten free more time or should I exclude high iodine foods or exclude everything all at once? Need help! I also have low potassium so that seems to make it trickier too.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mateto Enthusiast

I'd recommend you give up the gluten first, then wait maybe 3 weeks or a month. Then wonder, has anything changed?

If not, give up the iodine foods as well. If this works, then you can try to go back on gluten but not iodine and see what happens. It's a trial per se.

Twoxxmom Rookie

I'd recommend you give up the gluten first, then wait maybe 3 weeks or a month. Then wonder, has anything changed?

If not, give up the iodine foods as well. If this works, then you can try to go back on gluten but not iodine and see what happens. It's a trial per se.

I was thinking I should give gluten-free longer. I will give that a try. I probably can't go back to anything with wheat as I reacted to that on skin testing. I will be going back to the allergist next week.

squirmingitch Veteran

Yes, give the gluten free some time. Make sure you've cut all the gluten though. Then after about a month you can see how it's going. Keep a log. Take photos of the rash to help you judge at different stages. Then I would only cut the iodine if needed. And cutting the iodine is a temporary thing --- you don't do it forever. I will mention that you go LOW iodine not iodine free. And I would do the sals as a last resort.

Twoxxmom Rookie

Yes, give the gluten free some time. Make sure you've cut all the gluten though. Then after about a month you can see how it's going. Keep a log. Take photos of the rash to help you judge at different stages. Then I would only cut the iodine if needed. And cutting the iodine is a temporary thing --- you don't do it forever. I will mention that you go LOW iodine not iodine free. And I would do the sals as a last resort.

Thank you! I appreciate the help and support so much!

squirmingitch Veteran

YVW!smile.gif

itchy Rookie

I don't think two weeks is anywhere long enough on gluten free before trying other food reductions. DH goes away very slowly for many people. I was aware of improvements after a couple of weeks, but these were VERY small. And bear in mind that I had been mostly gluten free for 12 years, and was just converting to a very strict diet. It can be difficult to eliminate every shred of gluten from your diet if you are just starting out, so you should concentrate on that, IMO. It may take months to learn all the pitfalls, depending on how astute and disciplined you are.

I differ from many of the posters on the list. I have never been able to detect any effect of iodine, salycyclates or any substance other than gluten on my DH.

Iodine is essential in preventing thyroid diseases. Salycyclates are implicated in reducing several types of cancers. Many high iodine foods like salmon, sardines, mackerel are useful in preventing heart disease.

Unpleasant as it is, DH doesn't kill. Heart disease, thyroid disease, and cancer do, as well as coeliac indirectly. In my opinion it is dangerous to eliminate or significantly reduce otherwise health giving foods from the diet without an extremely good justification.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mateto Enthusiast

I meant three months....ooooops :unsure:

I'm sorry. Three weeks wouldn't prove anything.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Paula5042
    Newest Member
    Paula5042
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...