Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results


suziegp

Recommended Posts

suziegp Newbie

I tried posting in another forum, but I don't think I gave enough info and maybe it was the wrong forum. I would appreciate any help.

I was uninformed when my journey began in 2006. I just knew that if I didn't eat wheat I felt better. I stopped gluten, with an occasional cheat and if I didn't cheat too often I didn't get sick. After six weeks on a gluten-free diet I had an endoscopy which, of course, was negative since I had been gluten free.

In 2009 I cheated and ended up in so much pain I went to the ER where I was diagnosed with colitis (CT scan showed inflamed colon). A year later a different doctor diagnosed me with celiac using blood tests and I am also positive for the celiac gene. He is monitoring my blood and says I am still getting gluten somewhere. The day before my latest blood test I was sick. I had eaten out - a supposedly gluten-free meal, but that was 2 1/2 days prior to being ill. The results were still in the normal range, however my doctor interprets the test as showing I had gluten.

If I had gluten in my system, would the antibody numbers be higher than they are? Do IGG and IGA test out zero when you've been gluten free? Should I be aiming for zero?

I really don't understand the results, as it looks like they are 5 and 6, but he says 6/30, 5/30. I don't know what that means. Here is what he said:

I am writing in regard to these suboptimal antigliadin test results, since at 30 =100%;

IGA 6/30 which reflects > 20% impact from gluten on the immune system.

IGG 5/30 which reflects > 16.6% impact from gluten on the bowel lining

Component

Latest Ref Rng 6/19/2012

GLIADIN AB, IGG

<11 U/mL 5

GLIADIN AB, IGA

<11 U/mL 6

These levels do document that these % of damage are happening to your immune and intestinal systems at this time.

I've worked so hard to be gluten-free, being extra diligent since February. I've only eaten out 3 times in the last 4 months and was extremely careful. I eat a very limited diet. I don't even eat gluten-free breads, pretzels. etc. I'm getting very frustrated and down. Thanks so much for any help!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

Wait, what??? Is this note from an MD who actually went to medical school or some flaky naturopath? It reflects a profound lack of understanding of how immunoassays work and you need to run screaming from this practitioner!!! Your tests are negative, you're doing great.

Antibody tests are almost never zero because antibodies naturally cross-react, producing some background or "noise" in the test. (This is by design because it lets your body identify viruses and bacteria you've never encountered before as potential threats.) You are comfortably below the 11 U/mL the lab has identified as a positive result, meaning that they cannot tell your blood test from that of a normal person who has no gluten issues at all.

suziegp Newbie

Wait, what??? Is this note from an MD who actually went to medical school or some flaky naturopath? It reflects a profound lack of understanding of how immunoassays work and you need to run screaming from this practitioner!!! Your tests are negative, you're doing great.

Antibody tests are almost never zero because antibodies naturally cross-react, producing some background or "noise" in the test. (This is by design because it lets your body identify viruses and bacteria you've never encountered before as potential threats.) You are comfortably below the 11 U/mL the lab has identified as a positive result, meaning that they cannot tell your blood test from that of a normal person who has no gluten issues at all.

Thank you so much. I feel so much better knowing I'm not doing something wrong and that my hard work has paid off. Yes, he's an MD, but a general practitioner. Celiac is not his specialty. Guess I'd better go on a search ....

Thanks again!

Skylark Collaborator

Wow, that's still sort of inexcusable from someone who went to medical school. Well, there's that joke - "What do you call the worst student in a medical school graduating class?" "Doctor."

Good luck finding someone who understands celiac better. I think your labs are fine. B)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,210
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BJ OConnor
    Newest Member
    BJ OConnor
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.