Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

2 Docs 2 Oppions


heatherh

Recommended Posts

heatherh Rookie

I'm so confused. On friday I got the results of the blood work. They are positive in one area(anti-gliden) and considered within normal range in the others. The tests were preformed by my rhmatologyst(sp). i got the results from my primary care physisian who stated that I tested positive for celiac and needed to go on a glutin-free diet immedeatly. I called the rhmatologyst to get some things clearified, they told me I needed a stomic biopsy.I did resurce on the net and both here and other places said that if a stomic biopsy is needed you must maintain diet so not to skew the results. So I called again on monday, doc wasn't in. Today when I spoke to rhatologysts nurse she asked why I had requested a biopsy(I didn't, they told me I needed one) and told me that there was no way to get me into a gastro-doc before I move....anyway by primary care docs nurse calls me and reads me the consult notes that were faxed to them. She was a bit unsure about it all.They pretty much said that even though the tests show I have a positive factor for celiac, that the she dosen't think I have it and that I should seek futher treatment for my gastrointestanal issues once I get to my new location. In my oppion she made me sound like an ass and has confused the hell out of me. Do I have this...do I not. The primary care nurse told me that in her oppion positive results meen positive and that I do in fact have this problem. My primary care doctor says to try a glutin-free diet and that I should start to feel better within a few weeks. My rhomatologyst has yet to return my calls and when I call she has a nurse speek to me.So I have one doctor (willing to take the time to speek with me over the phone and explain everything, give me hand outs on everything )telling me I have this problem and another doctor despite positive results says I dont. Help me sort thew this.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

Dr.s really do not know enough abut Celiac yet, especially if they are not Gastroenterologists... IMHO, you have elevated results therefore you have Celiac... or at the very least a Gluten Intolerance. You can wait for another Dr. to agree with the one Dr. and give you a biopsy and take a chance that they don't take enough samples and miss any potentially damaged areas of intestines. Or, you can take your health into your own hands and try the diet. If you have a positive response to the gluten-free diet, then you will have your answer, Gluten is bad for you. If no improvement after a while, you can go back on gluten and resume testing to find out what is wrong. But I'm willing to bet you that because you have an elevated marker, you will benefit tremendously from a gluten-free diet.

nettiebeads Apprentice
Dr.s really do not know enough abut Celiac yet, especially if they are not Gastroenterologists... IMHO, you have elevated results therefore you have Celiac... or at the very least a Gluten Intolerance.  Or, you can take your health into your own hands and try the diet. If you have a positive response to the gluten-free diet, then you will have your answer, Gluten is bad for you. If no improvement after a while, you can go back on gluten and resume testing to find out what is wrong. But I'm willing to bet you that because you have an elevated marker, you will benefit tremendously from a gluten-free diet.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I thoroughly agree with nini. You have one positive test, biopsies can be inconclusive and give false negatives. Go with the gluten-free diet, (what have you got to lose?) and see what happens in three weeks. If you do see a lessening of symptoms, then you are on the right track. Although I sure don't envy you going gluten-free while experiencing the stress of moving. Good Luck!

skbird Contributor

I can relate. My primary care doc said if avoiding gluten helps, then do it, that's enough for my treatment. He also said I am the most successful on the diet of anyone he's treated. But then I got sent to a rheumatologist because I had an elevated ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies). I liked the rheumy at first, especially because he knew something about gluten, but then, when he couldn't find anything specific fitting his criteria, he blamed all my problems on gluten and told me to get into a gastroenterologist. I could buy this excuse if I was still consuming gluten but at that point I had been gluten free for 8 months. Anyway, I get to go to the gastro tomorrow. I feel like I'm being shipped around everywhere.

I don't need a Celiac diagnosis, personally, because I know I can't tolerate gluten. I am hoping the gastro tomorrow won't be mad at me because I am gluten free (nearly a year now) and that he will look beyond just what has already been discovered. I have noticed docs, when they don't quite know what is up, will glaum on to a prior mystery diagnosis. I am usually careful to not reveal what has been questionably suspected for me when I'm at a new doc because of this.

What's most important is knowing what helps you, not always what the docs speculate about. If they say no, you don't have a gluten problem, but you feel better off gluten, then don't eat it.

Take care

Stephanie

skbird Contributor

I can relate. My primary care doc said if avoiding gluten helps, then do it, that's enough for my treatment. He also said I am the most successful on the diet of anyone he's treated. But then I got sent to a rheumatologist because I had an elevated ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies). I liked the rheumy at first, especially because he knew something about gluten, but then, when he couldn't find anything specific fitting his criteria, he blamed all my problems on gluten and told me to get into a gastroenterologist. I could buy this excuse if I was still consuming gluten but at that point I had been gluten free for 8 months. Anyway, I get to go to the gastro tomorrow. I feel like I'm being shipped around everywhere.

I don't need a Celiac diagnosis, personally, because I know I can't tolerate gluten. I am hoping the gastro tomorrow won't be mad at me because I am gluten free (nearly a year now) and that he will look beyond just what has already been discovered. I have noticed docs, when they don't quite know what is up, will glaum on to a prior mystery diagnosis. I am usually careful to not reveal what has been questionably suspected for me when I'm at a new doc because of this.

What's most important is knowing what helps you, not always what the docs speculate about. If they say no, you don't have a gluten problem, but you feel better off gluten, then don't eat it.

Take care

Stephanie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,139
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kathleen apodaca
    Newest Member
    kathleen apodaca
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.