Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Any Thoughts On These Results? Did They Include Everything?


greenchick22

Recommended Posts

greenchick22 Rookie

I posted several days ago about my negative results and they came today.  I would love someone to explain them to me!

 

Celiac Panel 10

 

 

Test                        Result                             Flag                  Acceptable

 

TTG AB IGA              1.5 U/ml                          N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGG         10.1 U/ml            N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGA     2.1                          N                        <20

 

TTG AB IGG             10.6                                N                         <20

 

IGA                            106                                N                        69-380

 

Endomysial Screen - Negative

 

*There is a note at the bottom that in the case of negative results and still suspected Celiac, the total IGA should be measured to test for deficiency.  Could I possibly have that?  How does one know whether to pursue that?

 

Thanks so much!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

That looks like a really comprehensive panel. The tTG's, DGP's and EMA tests are all for detecting intestinal damage (high levels cause it) and are the best tests for detecting celiac. 

 

I think the IgA listed on the lab was the total (serum) IgA. Immunoglobulin A is low in about 5% of celiacs so that is why they run it. If your IgA levels are normal, then you make adequate IgA for the actual celiac tests to be accurate. Yours is normal, albeit a bit on the low side, so your celiac tests (DGP, tTG, EMA) should be accurate.

 

The only tets not run was the anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA IgA and AGA IgG). It is an older test that is thought by some to show gliadin sensitivity in both celiacs and non-celiac gluten sensitive (NCGS) individuals. It does not have a perfect sensitivity though and can miss some people.

 

To me, it looks like you probably don't have celiac disease, but you could still have a gluten sensitivity that can produce all the same nasty symptoms as celiac disease does, minus the intestinal damage.

 

Are you planning on going gluten-free? Best wishes.

GottaSki Mentor

I posted several days ago about my negative results and they came today.  I would love someone to explain them to me!

 

Celiac Panel 10

 

 

Test                        Result                             Flag                  Acceptable

 

TTG AB IGA              1.5 U/ml                          N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGG         10.1 U/ml            N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGA     2.1                          N                        <20

 

TTG AB IGG             10.6                                N                         <20

 

IGA                            106                                N                        69-380

 

Endomysial Screen - Negative

 

*There is a note at the bottom that in the case of negative results and still suspected Celiac, the total IGA should be measured to test for deficiency.  Could I possibly have that?  How does one know whether to pursue that?

 

Thanks so much!

 

Had you removed gluten or eaten gluten light before the blood was drawn?

 

The tests are indeed all negative, but the one interesting item is your Total Serum IgA -- while it is not officially LOW - it is on the low end of normal which is common among myself, my children and grands....Only myself and my eldest child had tested marginally positive antibody tests with decades of unexplained illness.  Our endoscopic biopsies were all severe with complete villous atrophy.

 

If you or your doctors suspect Celiac Disease -- I would encourage either endoscopy and/or complete removal of gluten for three months (six is better) to monitor symptoms.  Do not remove until all testing is complete.  Once testing is complete -- elimination of gluten is the only test for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS).

 

Good Luck to you :)

greenchick22 Rookie

Thank you so much!  I was eating normally at the time.

 

Had you removed gluten or eaten gluten light before the blood was drawn?

 

The tests are indeed all negative, but the one interesting item is your Total Serum IgA -- while it is not officially LOW - it is on the low end of normal which is common among myself, my children and grands....Only myself and my eldest child had tested marginally positive antibody tests with decades of unexplained illness.  Our endoscopic biopsies were all severe with complete villous atrophy.

 

If you or your doctors suspect Celiac Disease -- I would encourage either endoscopy and/or complete removal of gluten for three months (six is better) to monitor symptoms.  Do not remove until all testing is complete.  Once testing is complete -- elimination of gluten is the only test for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS).

 

Good Luck to you :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,077
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.