Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It Worth Making The Inclusion Of Gluten Intolerance Even More Salient?


jaywalker

Recommended Posts

jaywalker Rookie

Not sure I chose the right sub-forum for this. Please feel free to move it

 

I stopped posting on this forum for about 2 years. I recently returned because Google searches kept throwing me back here, and I realised I could find a lot more answers and  relevant discussion here than anywhere else.

 

Also I realised- crucially- that this forum makes no distinction between Celiac and Gluten Intolerant, except where relevant. 

 

And it's not often very relevant is it? Given that it's  nigh-on impossible to make a clear distinction, in practice, between the two groups (given lack of availabity, and unreliabity  of diagnostic tests) and given that the two groups seem to have identical symptoms, identical co-morbidities, and identical problems in coping with the illness!

 

So, hats off to this forum for recognising all that!

 

But still,   as somebody who's repeatedly  had her symptoms dismissed as  psychogenic, due to failing the blood test, I pretty much ceased to feel as if i had any rightful place on a celiac forum;  especially given the increasing likelihood that I fell into the "intolerence" category (which wasn't really recognised at all, a few years back, when i started on this tortuos journey)

 

I see that the sub-headings on the sub-fora give repeated clues as to the overall stance this forum takes. Again, well done!

 

It would be churlish, I think to suggest a complete name-change. Still, I do wonder if that might be for the best.

 

jay :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Donna Yunkus
    Newest Member
    Donna Yunkus
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...