Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It Worth Making The Inclusion Of Gluten Intolerance Even More Salient?


jaywalker

Recommended Posts

jaywalker Rookie

Not sure I chose the right sub-forum for this. Please feel free to move it

 

I stopped posting on this forum for about 2 years. I recently returned because Google searches kept throwing me back here, and I realised I could find a lot more answers and  relevant discussion here than anywhere else.

 

Also I realised- crucially- that this forum makes no distinction between Celiac and Gluten Intolerant, except where relevant. 

 

And it's not often very relevant is it? Given that it's  nigh-on impossible to make a clear distinction, in practice, between the two groups (given lack of availabity, and unreliabity  of diagnostic tests) and given that the two groups seem to have identical symptoms, identical co-morbidities, and identical problems in coping with the illness!

 

So, hats off to this forum for recognising all that!

 

But still,   as somebody who's repeatedly  had her symptoms dismissed as  psychogenic, due to failing the blood test, I pretty much ceased to feel as if i had any rightful place on a celiac forum;  especially given the increasing likelihood that I fell into the "intolerence" category (which wasn't really recognised at all, a few years back, when i started on this tortuos journey)

 

I see that the sub-headings on the sub-fora give repeated clues as to the overall stance this forum takes. Again, well done!

 

It would be churlish, I think to suggest a complete name-change. Still, I do wonder if that might be for the best.

 

jay :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,631
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ZJT
    Newest Member
    ZJT
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      That's how I took it but I was confused because in your previous post you said of your biopsy, "and mine very much showed damage".  In the celiac antibody panel that was ordered, was there a test for total IGA included, aka, "Immunoglobulin A (IgA)"? This one checks for IGA deficiency. IGA deficiency can result in false negatives for the IGA celiac antibody tests such as the TTG-IGA and the DGP-IGA.
    • AllyJR
      The biopsy results were what said indicative of "weak or partially treated celiac disease".
    • trents
      Exactly what component was indicative of "weak celiac disease"? Is that a reference to the endoscopy results or the whole picture of the results of the blood test combined with the endoscopy results? Villous blunting is the hallmark of celiac disease.
    • trents
      Of course, what you breathe in eventually winds up in the gut because it gets trapped in the mucous lining of the airway and throat.
    • ohmichael
×
×
  • Create New...