Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy On Wednesday, Doctor Doesn't Think Celiac


strangedays

Recommended Posts

strangedays Newbie

Hello,

After a long process, I've finally been referred from my doctor to a GI for an endoscopy this coming Wednesday. I had my consultation today, however, and found out my doctor didn't forward most of my info over so that all the GI knew about me and my symptoms were brief notes from referring doc and what info I could cram into the brief consultation:

He knew I had an h pylori infection in August that was treated with "h-PAC" medication. I told him I've been having abdominal pains, switch between D and constipation, light headedness, and weight gain without a change in diet.

Because I couldn't link the pain I was experiencing to a certain food, he interpreted my symptoms as not having to do with celiac.

When I asked him what he thought was wrong, he said maybe nothing or maybe an ulcer. I really don't think it's either! He also said he might take a biopsy.

I'm worried that after all this waiting, my GI may not really be informed on celiac, and my chance to get a proper dx will be wasted.

When getting an endoscopy done, would there be any visible signs/damage that could point to celiac? Anything that would support the dx? Also, in Ontario, if I asked him to take the biopsy for celiac testing, would he agree? Should I bring a complete list of symptoms with me to show him the day of?

I'm 22 and still learning how to advocate for and take care of myself, so any advice/personal experiences would be greatly appreciated.

-


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



iloathegluten Newbie

Some of the damage to the instestines may be visible, but a microscopic analysis of the biopsy would be necessary for a diagnosis.

 

Did he check your blood work at all? Or is he ruling out Celiac based off symptoms alone? I would maybe ask for a blood test. Bloodwork usually isn't too expensive, so I should hope he would at least order that on request... If not Celiac Disease, your symptoms could fit many other conditions too. That's the tricky thing with GI stuff. The symptoms often overlap. Definitely keep pursuing answers if your symptoms persist. If he doesn't listen or writes it off as IBS, I would seek a different doctor if at all possible. I've found in my experience with some doctors, once he or she makes up their mind about what you have, they don't change it easily.

 

I can totally sympathize with weight gain. One of the unfortunate things about experiencing involuntary weight gain is that many people assume you're secretely overeating or otherwise lying about your diet habits. I experienced weight gain as one of my primary symptoms a good deal of my life while eating 1,200 calories max a day, and when I started dropping weight like mad with no changes to my diet, my doctors told me they were proud of me and seemed happy I finally took an interest in getting my obesity under control. I ALWAYS had the desire, and I NEVER overate (I was in abdominal pain half the time...), so this was very insulting to me, but there is unfortunately such a stigma with excess weight that can blind even doctors to underlying issues. It's too easy for them to attribute the poor health to weight gain and not look into deeper causes. I regret not being more proactive for myself. Definitely make it clear you haven't made any changes to your diet. Even keep a food diary log to prove it if you can.

 

And as I said, if the doctor quits listening, find a new one. I've had to change mine a few times in order to get somewhere in finding answers for myself!

SkyBlue4 Apprentice

I don't know if I would go through with the endoscopy if I didn't trust the doctor to properly evaluate me. Damage may or may not be visible to the naked eye and biopsies are an important part of the evaluation process. 

 

Did you have a positive Celiac panel? Perhaps you could call the referring doctor who ordered those labs and have them fax over the results to the GI doctor TODAY. I would also pick up a copy of the labs and bring it along tomorrow to the endoscopy.

 

Good luck with everything! 

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

Hello,

After a long process, I've finally been referred from my doctor to a GI for an endoscopy this coming Wednesday. I had my consultation today, however, and found out my doctor didn't forward most of my info over so that all the GI knew about me and my symptoms were brief notes from referring doc and what info I could cram into the brief consultation:

He knew I had an h pylori infection in August that was treated with "h-PAC" medication. I told him I've been having abdominal pains, switch between D and constipation, light headedness, and weight gain without a change in diet.

Because I couldn't link the pain I was experiencing to a certain food, he interpreted my symptoms as not having to do with celiac.

When I asked him what he thought was wrong, he said maybe nothing or maybe an ulcer. I really don't think it's either! He also said he might take a biopsy.

I'm worried that after all this waiting, my GI may not really be informed on celiac, and my chance to get a proper dx will be wasted.

When getting an endoscopy done, would there be any visible signs/damage that could point to celiac? Anything that would support the dx? Also, in Ontario, if I asked him to take the biopsy for celiac testing, would he agree? Should I bring a complete list of symptoms with me to show him the day of?

I'm 22 and still learning how to advocate for and take care of myself, so any advice/personal experiences would be greatly appreciated.

-

 

I generally dislike and distrust doctors, but look at it from his point of view.  He hasn't been given all of the information, so as far as he knows you actually don't have Celiac - you may have something else going on.  I think it's actually a good sign that he'll be on the lookout for other problems and NOT just looking for Celiac.  You want to know what's wrong.  If it's Celiac, it's Celiac.  If it's something else, at least you'll know.

 

As far as visible damage, it probably varies from one person to the next, but I know for me there were visible signs of inflamation.  And my Celiac was caught early and was not yet that severe.  The doctor took several biopsies from various areas just to confirm and to make sure there wasn't something else going on in there, but she showed me the pictures.  Instead of being smooth, the lining of my intestine looked like gently rolling hills.

w8in4dave Community Regular

I know what you mean when it comes to Drs. My Dr. Wanted to dismiss all my problems also. But I pushed it and talked him into the Celiac panel. Hmmm it was positive!! Everything I have learned I have learned here. I would really talk to your Dr. there is a problem and dismissing it as nothing is not making it go away! Don't let them dismiss it!! If there is anything I have learned it is not to let the Dr. tell me there is nothing wrong! You wouldn't go to the Dr. If there was nothing wrong!! Talk to the GI Dr. Also, tell him all your problems he might look a lil harder or maby do a biopsy.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.