Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Tested Negative For Celiac Gene...


ktmlee

Recommended Posts

ktmlee Newbie

I recently was diagnosed with late onset type 1 diabetes (at age 33).  My endocrinologist wanted me tested for Celiacs, after mentioning I've had IBS my entire life.  Here was the results:

 

Gliadin Antibody Iga - my value 47 (standard range <20) - High

Gliadin Antibody Igg, Ttg Iga, and Ttg Igg were all < 5 (standard range <20) - Normal

 

My doctor said the high value was on the "less specific" test, but may still have Celiac's.  I was then referred to a Gastroenterologist who tested me for the Celiac gene HLADQ2 &HLADQ8, both of which just came back as negative.

 

Now I'm scheduled for an Endoscopy in 3 weeks for final confirmation.  But, based on this information, is it likely that I do NOT have celiacs?  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jebby Enthusiast

Most people with celiac disease are DQ2/DQ8 positive, but it is possible to have it without the genes (depending on the source I've seen that between 1 and 4 percent of celiacs do not have of the main genes). I was diagnosed 4 years ago with celiac disease, then found out after the fact that I am DQ2/DQ8 negative. I am double DQ7. So is my mom, who also has celiac disease. There were a few scientific posters at the International Celiac Disease Symposium in Chicago in Sept. showing that celiac can occur in non DQ2/DQ8 individuals as well. Hope this helps!

nvsmom Community Regular

I recently read in Dangerous Grains that only 90% of celiacs have the DQ2 gene and 94% have the DQ8 gene (I believe those were the numbers). It is very possible to have celiac disease without the DQ2 or DQ8 genes, most celiacs do have it though.

 

The AGA IgA is not used very often now a days because it is not a very sensitive test. It is not solely specific to celiac disease either; it is thought by some to occur in those with non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI) as well. Pages 10-12 of thios report discusses the tests: Open Original Shared Link

 

Because you have diabetes, if you have gluten sensitivity it is probably in the form of celiac disease; diabetes is the most common partnering autoimmune disease to appear with celiac disease. :( I would guess it is celiac disease.

 

Good luck with the biopsies. i hope you get some definitive results. Kepp eating gluten until the test is complete.

ktmlee Newbie

Thanks for the replies.  It makes sense why my doctor still wants the endoscopy then, since it could still be Celiacs.  Forcing myself to eat enough grains for this test has been hard though, since it doesn't help my blood sugar.  But, I guess I'll know in a few weeks time, and can go bread-free again after that!  Thanks again.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.