Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results


Lisalee1211

Recommended Posts

Lisalee1211 Newbie

Hi everyone.

I have a question. Forgive me I'm sure this has been asked. I'm a newbie.

About 4-5 yrs ago I was tested with negative results. (Blood work)

However, I've been getting sicker and sicker( been sick basically my whole life started with anemia and stomach problems at age 18) and I just assumed I was gluten sensitive. I did a gluten-free free diet on my own. Symptoms greatly improved. I didn't stay gluten-free and that is because I'm not disciplined-- so I filled up on the horrible gluten stuff and off

I went to a doctor that deals with a lot of gluten issues and other things. Just got my results back and my blood work shows celiac.

I'm shocked I always thought gluten sensitive.

He mentioned how I can get a biopsy I said no right away. He explained if the biopsy is not done right it could show negative. He basically left it up to me maybe cause I said no!!! Lol I don't really get if the blood work shows celiac should I believe it or do I need the biopsy??? I'm very confused and wish I would have talked to him more. Thought about all this after I left his office and it's been bugging me for days. I spoke with a nutritionist that's on staff and she helped me with the food part. So I'm working on getting the gluten out!

Thanks!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Lisalee, first of all, welcome!

If your blood work showed positive, then it's positive. I'm sorry. :-( There would only be the question of how extreme was the positive? If the numbers were very high, then a biopsy would be beneficial to determine how much damage has been done to your intestines. (From my understanding, a higher count would mean more damage, but a blood test only counts current levels, thus meaning even a low count could have been much higher with a higher concentration of gluten at another time, meaning that a biopsy would still be recommended.) So I guess what I'm saying is biopsy is recommended no matter what the levels are on the blood test. A biopsy is not fun, but it definitely can tell you how bad off your intestines are, and a repeat biopsy later on can show if you are doing a good job staying 100% gluten free by showing healing in your intestines. But, as I said, the blood work alone is pretty much enough to say you have celiac, especially coupled with going gluten free and seeing improvements. I know this is kinda a mixed up reply, but the bottom line is that a biopsy is recommended to determine how much damage is present.

Lisalee1211 Newbie

Thanks for the welcome and reply Georgia guy!!!

I guess I'm in denial!! Lol.

Not funny but I have to laugh at myself. I totally get your point on the biopsy -- thing is if I go gluten-free NOW I can't do it correct? I need to be glutened again -- I don't think I can handle the back and forth thing anymore.

Thanks again!! I'm just venting.

Lisa

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Congratulations on getting the positive bloodwork! Though it seems shocking now, it's a blessing to know what's really going on. You know, with your back story, it makes me wonder how many folks who think they are gluten sensitive are actually celiacs.

 

It's up to you, but if you have the insurance coverage and the opportunity to do the biopsy, it's a good idea.

 

It will confirm the diagnosis and let you know some information on how progressed the damage is.

nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.

 

Like the others said, a biopsy is good to let you know what point your recovery is starting from and to check for other problems (in two years on this forum  i have NEVER seen someone mention another problem causing a positive blood test that was identified in a biopsy). Others find a biopsy useful if their blood work was not clear or they need more proof that they need to stay gluten-free.

 

All that being said, a biopsy can be skipped - I skipped mine.  LOL If you are sure you have a dignosis, I do not see a great need for a biopsy to be done, but that is just my personal opinion.

 

If you do decide on the biopsy, the gluten challenge is usually 2-4 weeks long in order to get an accurate biopsy.

 

What blood tests were done?  If you have multiple positives, or a positive EMA IgA or DGP IgG, then it's a sure thing it's celiac.  Sometimes a weak positive tTG IgA can indicate something other than celiac disease such as thyroiditis, crohn's, colitis, diabetes, chronic liver disease, or a serious infection - that is just weak positives though in a small minority of positive tests. Most positives are from celiac disease.

 

Best wishes!

Lisalee1211 Newbie

Thank you all for the replies.

My tTg igG is the only thing that came back postive.

I talked with my GI doctor and he said he will try to get me in next week for a byopsy. I thought

That was awesome because he was booked up but I told him and his staff I really hated to wait because I want to

Go gluten free ASAP because I can't take feeling like this.

So we shall see how this unfolds!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,078
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.