Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Correct Diagnosis?


ThisGalsGlutenFree

Recommended Posts

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

I recently had a blood test because my doctor suspects that I have celiac disease.  The results, in her words, suggest that I carry the antibody for celiac disease: The ANA screen is negative (no titer performed), the tTG-IgA is negative (<1.2U/mL), but the tTG-IgG is positive (10.5 U/mL).

 

My doctor did not recommend further testing, such as a biopsy, to confirm the celiac diagnosis, but did recommend that I eat completely gluten-free and see a dermatologist to diagnose the rash that I have, that seems to be consistent with pictures and descriptions of dermatitis herpetiformis. I am seeing another doctor to manage my new diet, and she thinks that the positive tTG-IgG test, along with the other symptoms I have described (skin rash and some GI issues) are conclusive enough that I shouldn’t go to the expense and trauma of a biopsy.

 

Am I wrong to not pursue further testing? Do other diseases closely mimic celiac? And I’ve read that the IgG test is less specific than the IgA test for diagnosing celiac – has anyone else had a negative IgA test and positive IgG test and found that they do have celiac disease? Thanks in advance for your comments.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Doorknocker Newbie

My diagnosis was based on the same.  My celiac panel was most definitely positive, and that with the rash and my symptoms was enough for my doctor to diagnose me as celiac.  He didn't think I needed the expense and trauma and time for the biopsy.  He's a good doctor and I really like him.  If he thinks this is what it is, I'm going with it.  I definitely believed him when several of my symptoms went away.  I'm still fighting the horrible rash and I am still having other issues, but the big D that I used to have just about every day is rare now, and the bloating went down and the headaches went away. 

SMRI Collaborator

I recently had a blood test because my doctor suspects that I have celiac disease.  The results, in her words, suggest that I carry the antibody for celiac disease: The ANA screen is negative (no titer performed), the tTG-IgA is negative (<1.2U/mL), but the tTG-IgG is positive (10.5 U/mL).

 

My doctor did not recommend further testing, such as a biopsy, to confirm the celiac diagnosis, but did recommend that I eat completely gluten-free and see a dermatologist to diagnose the rash that I have, that seems to be consistent with pictures and descriptions of dermatitis herpetiformis. I am seeing another doctor to manage my new diet, and she thinks that the positive tTG-IgG test, along with the other symptoms I have described (skin rash and some GI issues) are conclusive enough that I shouldn’t go to the expense and trauma of a biopsy.

 

Am I wrong to not pursue further testing? Do other diseases closely mimic celiac? And I’ve read that the IgG test is less specific than the IgA test for diagnosing celiac – has anyone else had a negative IgA test and positive IgG test and found that they do have celiac disease? Thanks in advance for your comments.

 

Did they test your total IgA ?  It's very possible that is low and you won't get a positive ttIgA, but could still have celiac. Your IgG is barely positive so it could be that you just haven't had it long enough to really spike.  Do you have a listing of all of the tests they ran?

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

Did they test your total IgA ?  It's very possible that is low and you won't get a positive ttIgA, but could still have celiac. Your IgG is barely positive so it could be that you just haven't had it long enough to really spike.  Do you have a listing of all of the tests they ran?

 

Thanks to both of you for your replies! SMRI, my doctor did not order a total IgA. She ordered tTG IgA & IgG, ANA, CBC & platelets, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. I believe that the CBC was run because she suspected that my weeping rash was a staph infection (it was not). I remember that when my doctor called with results, she said that I had a low positive, or something to that effect.

Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Thanks to both of you for your replies! SMRI, my doctor did not order a total IgA. She ordered tTG IgA & IgG, ANA, CBC & platelets, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. I believe that the CBC was run because she suspected that my weeping rash was a staph infection (it was not). I remember that when my doctor called with results, she said that I had a low positive, or something to that effect.

There is nothing requiring a biopsy for celiac diagnosis. The doctor can make a diagnosis based on a combination of factors including blood tests, symptoms, rash biopsy, intestinal biopsy, and/or improvement on a gluten free diet with one of the above.

However, if I'm not mistaking, ANA (or Anti Nucleic Antibodies) is not a celiac test, I have only seen that test in connection with diagnosis of SLE (Systemic Lupus).

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

There is nothing requiring a biopsy for celiac diagnosis. The doctor can make a diagnosis based on a combination of factors including blood tests, symptoms, rash biopsy, intestinal biopsy, and/or improvement on a gluten free diet with one of the above.

However, if I'm not mistaking, ANA (or Anti Nucleic Antibodies) is not a celiac test, I have only seen that test in connection with diagnosis of SLE (Systemic Lupus).

 

Please forgive my ignorance in including the ANA result; it was on the same page of the lab report as the celiac tests, so I wondered if I should include it. Thanks to each of you for your comments. I think I may be a bit in denial about having celiac disease.

Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Please forgive my ignorance in including the ANA result; it was on the same page of the lab report as the celiac tests, so I wondered if I should include it. Thanks to each of you for your comments. I think I may be a bit in denial about having celiac disease.

I wasn't saying it was ignorance including it, I just wanted to make sure that you (and your doctor) were aware that it's not a celiac test. In my experience, there are doctors who don't even know what tests are for celiac and what are not.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nora-n Rookie

was by chance the DGP test ordered?

SMRI Collaborator

Thanks to both of you for your replies! SMRI, my doctor did not order a total IgA. She ordered tTG IgA & IgG, ANA, CBC & platelets, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. I believe that the CBC was run because she suspected that my weeping rash was a staph infection (it was not). I remember that when my doctor called with results, she said that I had a low positive, or something to that effect.

 

It would be nice if dr's ordered complete tests to give the full picture of what is going on!!!  But, when all is said and done, a positive is a positive and the scope is just back up to the blood work.  Now, the actual scope and biopsy is pretty easy for you--but again, not really necessary.  I guess if I were your dr and got the lab results, I would have ordered a full IgG and IgA panel to see if those numbers were ok but I'm not your dr :D.  The next "test" is to see if you respond to a gluten-free diet.  Once your rash is looked at, start eating gluten-free.  If you see an improvement in symptoms, that will confirm your lab tests.

nora-n Rookie

there is  a DH folder here

nvsmom Community Regular

If you want more blood tests, there are a few you could request: DGP IgA, DGP IgG, EMA IgA, and possibly the older (and less reliable) AGA IgA and AGA IgG.  You'll need to still be eating gluten for them to be the most accurate.

 

I don't know is you need more tests though. The tTG IgG is about 95% specific to celiac disease, so a false positive would only happen 5% of the time (approximately).  It is not the most sensitive test though; I think it was less than the tTG IgA which means it would miss quite a few celiacs with false negatives.  I'm afraid that I'm away from home and don't have the links to back that info up.  This report has some info you could use though: Open Original Shared Link

 

BTW, I skipped the biopsy with a positive tTG IgA and EMA IgA, and I have no regrets.

 

Best wishes to you.

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

The tTG IgA and tTG IgG were the only celiac tests ordered. Since finding this forum, I see that there are several other tests that could or should have been ordered. I've been eating gluten free for over two weeks now, so any other blood tests (and DH diagnosis?) would be skewed. I'm terrified of a challenge period to test again because the rash has been so hard to live with, but I'll do it if I must. I've started to see some improvement in the rash and with other symptoms the last few days, so I'm cautiously hopeful that the diagnosis was correct and I can get on with life.

 

Thanks for the heads-up on the DH forum!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      4

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    2. - Mari replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      18

      My only proof

    3. - Ginger38 replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    5. - Scott Adams replied to emzie's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      2

      Stomach hurts with movement


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,470
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Elkay008
    Newest Member
    Elkay008
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Ginger38
      It has been the most terrible illness ever! Going on 3 weeks now… I had chicken pox as a kid… crazy how much havoc this dormant virus has caused after being reactivated! No idea what even caused it to fire back up. I’m scared this pain and sensitivity is just never going to improve or go away 
    • Mari
      OKJmartes. Skin and eyes. Also anxiety and frustration. I have read that Celiacs have more skin problems than people who do not have Celiacs. I take increased levels of Vit. D3, very high levels of B12 and an eating part of an avocado every day. KnittyKitty and others here can add what they take for skin health. A Dermatologist might identify the type of skin condition. By eyes you may mean eyesight problems not just irritated, red eyes. It is not very difficult to get a diagnosis of which eye condition is affecting your vision but much more difficult to find an effective remedy. The ophthalmologists I have seen have been only a little helpful. There seems to have been some advances in eye treatments that most of them are completely ignorant of or just won't add to their treatment plans.  Forcertain you may as well buy some remedy from a facebook ad but that is obviously risky and may actually damafe your eyes. However it is known that certain supplements , taken at the effectivelevels do help with eyesight. Two of them are Luten and zanthamin (spelling?)and certain anti-oxidants such as bilberry..    Hope this helps.
    • Ginger38
      I refused to do the gluten challenge for a long time because I knew how sick I would be: I have always had and still have positive antibodies and have so many symptoms my  GI was 💯 sure I would have a positive biopsy. I didn’t want to make myself sick to get a negative biopsy and be more confused by all this.  He couldn’t guarantee me a negative biopsy meant no celiac bc there may not be damage yet or it’s possible to miss biopsies where there’s damage but he was so sure and convinced me I needed that biopsy I went back on gluten. It was a terrible experience! I took pictures of the bloating and swelling and weight gain during the challenge. I gained 9 pounds, looked pregnant, was in pain , couldn’t work or function without long naps and the brain fog was debilitating. And in the end he didn’t get a positive biopsy… so I wish I had never wasted my time or health going through it. I haven’t been truly straightened  out since and I am currently battling a shingles infection at 43 and I can’t help but wonder if the stress I put my body under to try and get an official diagnosis has caused all this. Best of luck to you - whatever you decide. It’s not a fun thing to go through and I still don’t have the answers I was looking for 
    • Scott Adams
      It's completely understandable to struggle with the gluten challenge, especially when it impacts your health and studies so significantly. Your experience of feeling dramatically better without gluten is a powerful clue, whether it points to celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity. It's very wise of you and your doctor to pause the challenge until your holidays, prioritizing your immediate well-being and exams. To answer your questions, yes, it is possible for blood tests to be negative initially and become positive later as the disease progresses, which is why the biopsy remains the gold standard. Many, many people find the gluten challenge incredibly difficult due to the return of debilitating symptoms, so you are certainly not alone in that struggle. Wishing you the best for your exams and for obtaining clearer answers when you're able to proceed.
    • Scott Adams
      It's smart that you're seeing the gastroenterologist tomorrow. While it's possible this is a severe and persistent inflammatory reaction to gluten, the fact that the pain is movement-dependent and localized with tenderness is important for your specialist to hear. It could indeed be significant inflammation, but it's also worth ruling out other overlapping issues that can affect those with celiac disease. Is it possible you got some gluten in your diet somehow? This could be a possible trigger. Hopefully, tomorrow's appointment will provide clearer answers and a path to relief so you can get back to your lectures and enjoy your weekend. Wishing you all the best for the consultation.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.