Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dairy Sensitivity Question


Galixie

Recommended Posts

Galixie Contributor

If I react subtly to trace amounts of dairy, does that mean I'd definitely have a bigger reaction to larger amounts of dairy? Or could I end up having the same subtle reaction regardless of the amount?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



moosemalibu Collaborator

Do you have lactose intolerance or an allergy type reaction (anaphylaxis, etc)?  Either way I would recommend avoiding it if you body doesn't tolerate it well.

bartfull Rising Star

If you're a newly diagnosed celiac with lots of villi damage you can't digest dairy because the villi are the part of your body that does that. Given time (maybe six months?) you may well get dairy back.

Galixie Contributor

It is neither lactose intolerance nor true allergy. It seems to be a sensitivity to casein and whey. The very mild reaction I seem to get after just a trace amount is only a stuffy nose. I did consume dairy for about 40 years before going off of it, so I know it wouldn't ever cause a life-threatening reaction for me. I think the only symptoms dairy generally gives me are sinus problems and gut issues. I had thought that I'd be able to tolerate at least trace amounts without a problem because of the fact that it isn't a true allergy. I guess I'm just confused about whether more is automatically going to be worse or if it could end up just being the same reaction as a trace (which isn't that big of a deal if it's just a stuffy nose). I'm also a little confused about why I'd react to a trace even though I've had dairy all my life up until 3 months ago. I don't know whether to interpret it as needing to stay away from all dairy forever, or whether I should experiment with adding some dairy back in to see how much is really too much.

 

A trace amount gives me such a mild reaction that I just don't know what it means. :unsure:

  • 2 months later...
rockymtntapper Newbie

Sort of a guess, but I'm thinking that if you avoiding it right now and it gives you a mild reaction, if you were to add it into your diet again completely you'd probably have a worse reaction. Since it's not a true allergy and just a sensitivity, you will probably be able to add it in eventually after letting your gut heal. I ate dairy all my life and now my body hates it, but I think it's just because my gut is so damaged it can't process it. After avoiding it for about a year, I was able to have it once every couple months without a reaction, but when I tried eating dairy regularly again I started having major reactions immediately after consuming it (extreme bloating, pain, sometimes even vomiting). 

  • 1 month later...
Galixie Contributor

I have now had it confirmed that I have a dairy intolerance as opposed to a true dairy allergy. After having hives for a week (from an unrelated cause), I finally saw an allergist who did some skin-prick tests on me. While some of the food test areas did appear red, none of them developed a weal of 3mm or more. It was pointed out to me that I have very sensitive skin because the control test of saline also turned red (which it shouldn't have).

 

He did say that, since it isn't a true allergy, it wouldn't kill me to cheat and have dairy once in awhile. I will keep that in mind, but for now I'm still staying away from it.

 

While I was there I tried to ask the doctor about the meaning of just a positive IgA test when the rest of the celiac panel was negative. He wasn't familiar with the test I was asking about. All he could tell me was that there is no test for NCGS. So I'm still stumped on that one.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - nanny marley replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    2. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    3. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    4. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    5. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • nanny marley
      I agree there I've tryed this myself to prove I can't eat gluten or lactose and it sets me back for about a month till I have to go back to being very strict to settle again 
    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.