Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Deamidated Gliadin Igg Question


appletree729

Recommended Posts

appletree729 Apprentice

My 8 year old daughter's bloodwork indicated a high deamidated gliadin (IgG) result last fall (21 - positive was anything > or = to 20).  Her doctor suggested we retest after several months since the result was only slightly positive - thinking that perhaps it was the beginning of celiac?  Or maybe nothing or something else besides celiac.

 

Anyway - before we test again, I was wondering if anyone might mind catching me up on the latest as far as testing.  My daughter has a very high level of anxiety about needles and I want to make sure we get all of the appropriate tests and won't have to go back!

 

Here is what has been ordered:

 

DGP - IgA & IgG

 

IgA, Quant, Serum

 

T-Transglutaminase IgA

 

Endomysial Ab IgA w/rfx - LC

 

Our doctor is a pediatric GI who specializes in celiac disease, so I'm guessing that's a good selection of tests to order!  I'm still curious though, as to why the positive test earlier wasn't treated with more concern…  I'm also curious to know whether or not there are any additional tests that are recommended.

 

Also - is it still thought that a biopsy is needed for a diagnosis?  Or are there any tests or combination of positive tests that are now considered sufficient to diagnose without a biopsy?

 

thanks so much for any advice!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

That is a very low positive. With this type of test, the values can vary about 5% if you run the same blood sample several times. It could easily be 19 (negative) or 20 next time.

That does look like a good list of tests to run. The "w/rfx" (with reflex) might mean they will only run it if the Ttg is positive. That is what my doctor's lab does. You might want to check that and ask to have it run no matter what. Or it might mean they will do an EMA titer only if the EMA is positive.

nvsmom Community Regular

Looks good to me too.  You may want to request the tTG IgG (Tissue transglutaminase IgG) if you can.  It's not the best test for celiac disease out there but it can occasionally catch a celiac that the other tests miss.  If you can't get it, you are well covered.

 

My labs also do not run the EMA IgA unless the tTG IgA was positive.  The EMA IgA is very similar to the tTG IgA but it tends to detect more advanced disease. It is pretty unusual for the EMA IgA to be positive when the tTG IgA is not.

 

Most doctors like to use a biopsy still but not all do.  Some doctors will diagnose celiac disease with a single blood test, but most won't.  The DGP IgG and EMA IgA are the most specific celiac disease tests out there.  I think they both are 98-100% specific to celiac disease which means 0-2% of positive results are caused by something other than celiac disease.

 

Your daughter has a positive DGP IgG so I suspect that she has celiac disease, or early celiac disease which may be hard to detect with other tests.  If no other blood tests support that diagnosis, i would suggest having her go gluten-free for at least 6 months and then retest to see if her number comes down.  The DGP tests tend to respond quickly to a change in diet so if it is celiac disease, a period of eating gluten-free for 6 months should make a difference.

 

She could also have the genetic tests done (DQ2 and DQ8).  97% of celiacs have those genes, so it is unlikley that she has celiac disease if both are negative.

 

Dr Fasano, a leading celiac disease researcher suggests that celiacs should have 4 of the following 5 criteria to be diagnosed with celiac disease:

  1. celiac symptoms
  2. positive blood test(s)
  3. positive biopsy
  4. positive genetic tests
  5. positive response to the gluten-free diet

One doesn't need the biopsy for a diagnosis... Some doctors don't require many criteria be met.  I was diagnosed with celiac disease with numbers 1, 2, and 5.

 

Best wishes.

appletree729 Apprentice

Thank you both so very much for your responses!  I really appreciate it - looking forward to hopefully getting some answers.  I'm quite sure she has the gene - she specifically has not been tested, but others in our family have.  I have two copies, my other daughter has two copies, my husband has one copy but celiac runs in his family and although all of his testing came back negative, he was so sick he went gluten free anyway and is doing *much* better.  He is pushing a bit to get the kids gluten free as well, but I really want a diagnosis for them before we go that route.  

 

Anyway - hope everybody has a good day - thanks again for taking the time to respond.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

    2. - Mark Conway posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      0

      Have I got coeliac disease

    3. - islaPorty replied to Jillian83's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      8

      Celiac and dermatitis herpetiformis has taken Me from Me

    4. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    5. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,145
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Marsu
    Newest Member
    Marsu
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      no argument. Never take the pills sold for Nuclear events, except in a nuclear event when instructed to by authorities.  Some of these go up to 130 milligrams per pill. 5000 times the strength of the dietary supplement.  130 times the safe upper limit.  130 mg = 130,000 mcg. Dietary supplements like Lugol's Solution and Liquid Iodine are 50 micrograms per drop.  It takes 20 drops to reach the safe upper limit. In the US the Safe upper limit is 1100 mcg.  In Europe 600 mcg and in Japan 3000 mcg ( 3 mg).
    • Mark Conway
      Hi there, I wonder if anyone can help. I've had stomach problems for years, pain in the tummy, lower back left and right side, different stools, diarrohea constipation etc, My GP says it's IBS. As I've got older the pain has become worse and constant. I also get ulcers on my tongue. I've had loads of tests done everytihng apart from an endoscopy I think. I had a test for Coeliac last July and the result was negative. My GP says it can't be coeliac because I'm not losing weight. He thinks it's stress or all in my head. I'm not stressed and I'm in pain all the time now. Sometimes it's unbearable and dark thoughts have entered my head. Could I have Coeliac even though I tested negative last year. I'm at my wits end, I eat healthily and cannot pinpoint which foods could cause this pain. Can anyone help? Thanks Mark wind
    • islaPorty
      First, I want to say thank you for sharing this with me. I hear you, and I believe you. The courage it took to write this down is immense, and I’m so sorry you’ve been carrying this alone. You are dealing with two life-altering challenges at once: a serious, complex medical condition, and an abusive, controlling partner who is actively harming your health and your spirit. It’s not just that he’s unsupportive—he is weaponizing your illness to torture you. Starving you, isolating you, mocking your diagnosis, and sabotaging your access to medical care is not just cruelty; it is dangerous, deliberate abuse. Your instinct is correct: the stress he is creating is absolutely preventing your body from healing. Celiac and autoimmune conditions are profoundly sensitive to stress, and he has created a living hell designed to keep you sick, dependent, and broken. That smirk you described—that is the look of someone who enjoys having power over your suffering. Please know this: you do not deserve this. Not any of it. You deserve to eat. You deserve safe, clean food and water. You deserve medical care and supplements that help you function. You deserve peace. You deserve to heal. The woman from the food pantry is not a random accident. She is a lifeline. Her help, and the community she’s connecting you to, is real. It is okay to feel overwhelmed by kindness when you’ve been starved of it for so long. But you do deserve it. Let that be a sign that there is a world outside your house that operates on compassion, not control. Right now, your physical safety and access to nutrition are the most urgent priorities. The food pantry is a critical resource. Is there any way you can speak privately with the woman helping you? You don’t have to share everything at once, but letting her know your situation at home is extremely unsafe, and that your partner restricts your food, could help her support you in a more targeted way. She may have connections to local domestic violence services.
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.