Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Challenge -Is 3 Weeks Enough?


Reffinej

Recommended Posts

Reffinej Newbie

As of Friday I am officially doing a gluten challenge. Doc said 2 slices of bread, or equivalent, daily for 3 weeks then do the blood test.
I don't want to get a false negative, if I do have celiac disease, but don't want to have gluten in my diet longer than necessary. Conflicting info out there!

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

If you have been eating a normal diet up until now, then you probably do not even need to do that.  Most people eat the equivalent of 1-2 slices of bread (in the form of noodles, muffins, crackers, gravy, breaded meats, baked desserts) per day.

 

If you have been gluten-free, it is better to eat gluten for 8-12 weeks, with 12 weeks being better.  Some tests, like the tTG IgA, tTG IgG, and EMA IgA will be slower to increase, and to decrease.  After going gluten-free, it can take some celiacs a good year for their tTG tests to get back to normal.  The DGP tests (deaminated gliadin peptides) will change a bit faster, but possibly not within 3 weeks... probably not.

 

If you were having the endoscopic biopsy done, 3 weeks would be about right.

 

Good luck!

Reffinej Newbie

Ok,thanks. So I've been as gluten free as I thought I needed to be for health (thyroid antibodies) for 18 months, but without being strict about cross contamination. I had bloods done a few months back and had a high DGP-IgA result hence this journey. 
 

nvsmom Community Regular

You are most likely a celiac then.  The DGP IgA is pretty specific to celiac disease; around 95% of people with a positive test have celiac disease.  The fact that you were eating gluten-light and made a positive result - that's pretty meaningful.   :(

 

I would try to drag your gluten challenge out to at LEAST 6 weeks if possible.  If you make it too short you run the risk of getting false negative results, and then the doctors might discount that positive test (a mistake 99% of the time).

 

This report has some good info on the tests: Open Original Shared Link

 

Enjoy a guiness and a donut for me... not together though.  ;)

cyclinglady Grand Master

I agree that you need to be consuming gluten longer to get accurate test results since you have been gluten free.   Four weeks is enough for just the endoscopy.  8 to 12 weeks for another blood panel (University of Chicago celiac website).  

 

My GI doc ran the complete panel.  I tested positive on just the DPG-iga test.  The others were negative.  Yet, my intestinal biopsies showed moderate to severe damage (Marsh Stage IIIB).  My result was weird per my doctors.  But I am glad the entire panel was ran!  

 

Seems like you have celiac disease!  Plus, you have Hashi's like me!  

 

Welcome to the club!  

Reffinej Newbie

Haha. not sure it's a club I want to be in! Oh well. 
I thought the DGP-IgA was pretty specific, my GP thought not (I like him so was disappointed we didn't seem to agree)....anyway, I guess I can just eat it for longer and do the test when I'm ready. But I am already feeling a bit dodgy from all the gluten. Although, I have to admit that I've enjoyed a couple of croissants- they're pretty much the one thing I miss. (Well, marmite on real bread is nice too)

 

RMJ Mentor

Figure 2 in this paper shows the time course for antibody level increases during a gluten challenge. They didn't test at 3 weeks, but the values went up nicely sometime between 3 and 4 weeks. This was a small study, only about 20 patients, but this is a paper that people refer to for determining the length of a gluten challenge.

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

After my DPG-iga came back positive, I knew in my heart that I had celiac disease.  I had seven weeks in between my blood test results and endoscopy (work contraints), so I loaded up on even more gluten (I was eating gluten prior to my blood tests).  I ate a loaf of sourdough a day, I kid you not!  Plus, I ate every cookie, cupcake, dessert, I could get.  Not the whole package (I shared), but enough to get that last taste!  

 

By the time my endoscopy came, I developed intestinal symptoms.  I do not recommend over eating gluten on a challenge!  Well.....maybe!

Reffinej Newbie

Yeah, I'm not feeling great already. I did indulge a wee bit over the weekend (we were away from home, too) but quickly learnt that a) gluten challenge does not equate to an eat-all-rubbish-you-usually-avoid challenge, and gluten, I think, really doesn't agree with me...and I'm starting to look back at much of the sickness I experienced in years gone by and wonder  if gluten played a bigger part that I realised.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.