Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Disaccharidase Levels?


KBart

Recommended Posts

KBart Apprentice

My daughger's biopsy had some inflammation and one sample of villi that was shortened, she also had a positive TTG blood test and clinical symptoms, but the damage was not severe enough for the GI to give her a celiac disease diagnosis. Just a little background there. We are getting a second opinion.

My question is about the disaccharidase levels. Her lactase level and all the other digestive enzymes were normal. So does that mean she shouldn't have problems with lactose? I gave her ice cream last night (gluten-free) and within the hour she said she felt sick - like she had to throw up. She had a little gas and just felt bad. So if lactose isn't an issue, is there any correlation between the ice cream and her feeling poorly? And do the disaccharidase levels need to be reduced for celiac disease to be present?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

She might be reacting to the milk proteins (casein and whey). Start her out on hard cheeses and yogurt which contain very little lactose. If she still has issues, then you can assume that she is intolerant to the milk proteins. If she has celiac disease (Doctor: "Let's wait until there is severe damage because I can not condem a child to a gluten-free existence....") villi damage prevents enzymes to be released making her (hopefully) temporarily lactose intolerant.

Were her diaccharidase levels obtained through biopsy? I would imagine, like celiac disease, damaged or undamaged areas areas could be missed.

Edited: I am not a doctor! Just a mom who has celiac disease and was undiagnosed for so long! Hence, my sarcasm. I just hate to see kids suffer!

KBart Apprentice

She might be reacting to the milk proteins (casein and whey). Start her out on hard cheeses and yogurt which contain very little lactose. If she still has issues, then you can assume that she is intolerant to the milk proteins. If she has celiac disease (Doctor: "Let's wait until there is severe damage because I can not condem a child to a gluten-free existence....") villi damage prevents enzymes to be released making her (hopefully) temporarily lactose intolerant.

Were her diaccharidase levels obtained through biopsy? I would imagine, like celiac disease, damaged or undamaged areas areas could be missed.

Edited: I am not a doctor! Just a mom who has celiac disease and was undiagnosed for so long! Hence, my sarcasm. I just hate to see kids suffer!

That makes sense. Her levels were obtained through biopsy analysis. So yeah, since her damage was patchy, maybe the levels can be too?

cyclinglady Grand Master

I do not know, but it may be worth asking the doctor or doing more online research.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.