Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive biopsy but blood work negative


hanbanan

Recommended Posts

hanbanan Newbie

Hi Everyone,

This is my first post and I'm hoping someone can give me advice. I had a colonoscopy and egd done for multiple gastrointestinal symptoms I was  having and it came back indicating mild or beginning stages of celiac. I do not have a copy of the biopsy results but it said results indicated mild or beginning stages of celiac or other processes?? (something like that but I can't remember exactly what the nurse said). Anyway, they requested I get bloodwork done and the results are below:

 
 
 
Celiac Panel
 
Gliadin IgA
5 unit
Gliadin IgG
4 unit
Reticulin IgA
Negative
Reticulin IgA Add'l
not indicated.
Reticulin IgG
Negative
Reticulin IgG Add'l
Not Indicated
TTG IgA
1
 
 
These results are obviously negative but higher than my 2009 results when I was tested. Here are my 2009 results:
Gliadin IgA
<3 u/ml
Gliadin IgG
<3 u/ml
Reticulin IgA
<1:10
Reticulin IgG
<1:10
TTG IgA
<3 u/ml
 
What do you make of this? Should I be pursuing another diagnosis or asking for any more specific blood work to get a celiac dx? The biopsy indicated celiac but the bloodwork says otherwise. Thanks!
 
 
 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Lab ranges would be helpful as they vary from lab to lab.  The rediculin tests are not recommended anymore for celiac disease.  Read here:

Open Original Shared Link

These are the current tests:

-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and (tTG) IgG
-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and (DGP) IgG
-EMA IgA 
-total serum IgA and IgG (control test)
 
 
-endoscopic biopsy - make sure at least 6 samples are taken
 
VERY IMPORTANT:  Keep eating gluten daily until ALL testing is complete or the tests can be inaccurate.  
 
(Source: NVSMOM -- ?)
 
I would strongly recommend obtaining copies of all your lab results!  

 

Welcome to the forum and let us know how it goes! 

 

 

 

Mandy F. Apprentice

Hi! I haven't been to these forums in a long, long time since Celaic has been low on my list of priorities but I popped in for some help and saw your question...

I am by no means an expert. I haven't kept up on which tests are best and whatnot. What I can tell you, though, is that 9 years ago I had the "Celiac Panel" run 2 weeks before my scope w/biopsies and it came back negative. In the 6 months that I refused to admit I had Celiac and go on the diet, a different doctor ran it again - negative. Another 5-6 months later, after I had committed to the diet, yet another doctor ran it again - negative... It was run annually for a couple of years thereafter by my endocrinologist, though he never said why. I assumed it was to check for any hidden glutening (or cheating)...

With all that said, my biopsies were positive and, despite my 6 months of denial in the beginning, there is no doubt that I do have Celiac disease. Since committing to being gluten free, and my gut healing, I now react when I ingest gluten. I started off being able to cheat with fairly mild symptoms for the first several months. Now, there is nothing in the world that could tempt me to bring on that misery intentionally... ugh!

I agree with Cyclinglady, you definitely want to get copies of all of your lab work, your endoscopy notes, etc. to verify that they do say "early celiac" or something similar before you make any decisions to pursue other diagnoses or accept this one. However, given your intestinal symptoms and biopsy results, I think the easiest thing for you to do is probably just to go gluten free for a few weeks and see if it helps. If you stick with it for several weeks then eat something full of gluten, you'll probably have your answer. Having the verified test results would make it easier to prove your diagnosis should the need ever arise, but that's pretty rare...

Good luck sorting all of this out! I know it's a lot to take in at the beginning!

cyclinglady Grand Master
1 hour ago, Mandy F. said:

Hi! I haven't been to these forums in a long, long time since Celaic has been low on my list of priorities but I popped in for some help and saw your question...

I am by no means an expert. I haven't kept up on which tests are best and whatnot. What I can tell you, though, is that 9 years ago I had the "Celiac Panel" run 2 weeks before my scope w/biopsies and it came back negative. In the 6 months that I refused to admit I had Celiac and go on the diet, a different doctor ran it again - negative. Another 5-6 months later, after I had committed to the diet, yet another doctor ran it again - negative... It was run annually for a couple of years thereafter by my endocrinologist, though he never said why. I assumed it was to check for any hidden glutening (or cheating)...

With all that said, my biopsies were positive and, despite my 6 months of denial in the beginning, there is no doubt that I do have Celiac disease. Since committing to being gluten free, and my gut healing, I now react when I ingest gluten. I started off being able to cheat with fairly mild symptoms for the first several months. Now, there is nothing in the world that could tempt me to bring on that misery intentionally... ugh!

I agree with Cyclinglady, you definitely want to get copies of all of your lab work, your endoscopy notes, etc. to verify that they do say "early celiac" or something similar before you make any decisions to pursue other diagnoses or accept this one. However, given your intestinal symptoms and biopsy results, I think the easiest thing for you to do is probably just to go gluten free for a few weeks and see if it helps. If you stick with it for several weeks then eat something full of gluten, you'll probably have your answer. Having the verified test results would make it easier to prove your diagnosis should the need ever arise, but that's pretty rare...

Good luck sorting all of this out! I know it's a lot to take in at the beginning!

Great advice!  ?

hanbanan Newbie

Thank you both for your responses! Yes this is a frustrating experience for sure. I thought that the panel they did seemed a little outdated. A total IGA was never even done so I went back to have this done and am waiting on the results. The biopsy definitely read celiac. The nurse read me the results over the phone word for word and it read something like "mild or beginning stages of celiac disease" but then said something about "other processes" so not sure what that means. All the other things that mimic celiac seem really scary! I had really hoped the blood work would verify the the biopsy results because I have 3 kids and one of them has GI issues and I know celiac is hereditary. I'm not sure if this blood work comes back negative whether or not the doctor will want to pursue other possible diagnoses for the reason the biopsy looked the way it did or not. The process is stressful so thank you for your feedback!

squirmingitch Veteran

Here's a link to the Newbie 101. It will help teach you how to keep yourself safe. Follow all the links contained in the thread.

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

squirmingitch Veteran

OOPS! I posted the above to the wrong thread. Sorry. It's still useful info. though so I will leave it where it is.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,912
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    westman3d
    Newest Member
    westman3d
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @klmgarland, My dermatitis herpetiformis didn't clear up until I became meticulous about cross contamination. I cut out gluten-free oats and all gluten-free foods, dairy and gluten-free rice. Additionally, getting the right amount of protein for my body weight helped significantly in my body's healing process ... along with supplementing with enough of all the vitamins and minerals ... especially Zinc and Magnesium. I went from 70kg to 82kg in a year. Protein with each meal 3 times daily, especially eggs at breakfast made the difference. I'm not sure whether iodine was a problem for me, but I can tolerate iodine no problem now. I'm off Dapsone and feel great. Not a sign of an itch. So there is hope. I'm not advocating for the use of Dapsone, but it can bring a huge amount of relief despite it's effect on red blood cells. The itch is so distracting and debilitating. I tried many times to get off it, it wasn't until I implemented the changes above and was consistent that I got off it. Dermatitis Herpetiformis is horrible, I wouldn't wish it on anyone.  
    • klmgarland
      Thank you so very much Scott.  Just having someone understand my situation is so very helpful.  If I have one more family member ask me how my little itchy skin thing is going and can't you just take a pill and it will go away and just a little bit of gluten can't hurt you!!!! I think I will scream!!
    • Scott Adams
      It is difficult to do the detective work of tracking down hidden sources of cross-contamination. The scenarios you described—the kiss, the dish towel, the toaster, the grandbaby's fingers—are all classic ways those with dermatitis herpetiformis might get glutened, and it's a brutal learning curve that the medical world rarely prepares you for. It is difficult to have to deal with such hyper-vigilance. The fact that you have made your entire home environment, from makeup to cleaners, gluten-free is a big achievement, but it's clear the external world and shared spaces remain a minefield. Considering Dapsone is a logical and often necessary step for many with DH to break the cycle of itching and allow the skin to heal while you continue your detective work; it is a powerful tool to give you back your quality of life and sleep. You are not failing; you are fighting an incredibly steep battle. For a more specific direction, connecting with a dedicated celiac support group (online or locally) can be invaluable, as members exchange the most current, real-world tips for avoiding cross-contamination that you simply won't find in a pamphlet. You have already done the hardest part by getting a correct diagnosis. Now, the community can help you navigate the rest. If you have DH you will likely also want to avoid iodine, which is common in seafoods and dairy products, as it can exacerbate symptoms in some people. This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
    • Scott Adams
      It's very frustrating to be dismissed by medical professionals, especially when you are the one living with the reality of your condition every day. Having to be your own advocate and "fight" for a doctor who will listen is an exhausting burden that no one should have to carry. While that 1998 brochure is a crucial piece of your personal history, it's infuriating that the medical system often requires more contemporary, formal documentation to take a condition seriously. It's a common and deeply unfair situation for those who were diagnosed decades ago, before current record-keeping and testing were standard. You are not alone in this struggle.
    • Scott Adams
      Methylprednisolone is sometimes prescribed for significant inflammation of the stomach and intestines, particularly for conditions like Crohn's disease, certain types of severe colitis, or autoimmune-related gastrointestinal inflammation. As a corticosteroid, it works by powerfully and quickly suppressing the immune system's inflammatory response. For many people, it can be very effective at reducing inflammation and providing rapid relief from symptoms like pain, diarrhea, and bleeding, often serving as a short-term "rescue" treatment to bring a severe flare under control. However, experiences can vary, and its effectiveness depends heavily on the specific cause of the inflammation. It's also important to be aware that while it can work well, it comes with potential side effects, especially with longer-term use, so it's typically used for the shortest duration possible under close medical supervision. It's always best to discuss the potential benefits and risks specific to your situation with your gastroenterologist.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.