Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood test results for son


kkay

Recommended Posts

kkay Rookie

I was just officially diagnosed with celiac disease last week.  I also have a brother with celiac and most likely a niece with it.  I took my five kids to be screened as soon as I was diagnosed.  Despite my telling the doctor what tests he needed to do - he only tested them for TTG Iga!  I called the nurse back today and explained to her that it was not good enough because if any of my kids were Iga deficient, the test would not be telling us anything (they refuse to start with the full celiac panel, I will have to get a GI referral for that for the kids that I think need it).  So I am waiting to hear back from the doctor.

Four of my kids' results were 0, but my 14 year old result was >100.  0 - 3 was negative, 4 - 10 weak positive, and anything over 11 was positive.

I told the nurse I wanted the endoscopy done on my son.  They suggested he go gluten free and just see if it helps him (he spends so much time in the bathroom with stomach aches), but I want the endoscopy done.  My 14 year old son who eats a lot is not going to follow the diet unless he has to, so I need medical science to back me up, ha, ha.

I am curious though.  How likely do you think it is that he has celiac based on his blood results?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Odds are he has celiac disease.  That TTG score is pretty high.  But, as you said, an endoscopy would be help establish the amount of damage and he would NEVER question his diagnosis (and neither would any future doctors as long as you keep all records).  I personally would push for it.

Your other kids?  Did they check them for an IgA deficiency?  Chances are they may test like you.  My PCP ran the complete panel on my kid at my insistence because I test negative on everything but the DGP IgA and my biopsies revealed a Marsh Stage IIIB.  My PCP also checks my kid for anemia since that's how I presented.  She will get tested every few years (don't tell her but she's getting re-checked over the holiday break!).  She hates needles, but she already has Raynauld's syndrome (blue fingers and toes) and she could develop additional AI disorders due to our family history of MS, RA, Lupus, Grave's, Hashi's and celiac disease.  Yep, the odds are not in her favor.  

If your kids are IgA deficient, they should be screened for celiac disease.  Not everyone presents with symptoms.  I had anemia that was blamed on, you guessed it....being a woman!  No GI issues at all at the time I was diagnosed.  So, they need to be checked.  All the world's leading celiac disease experts recommend first degree relative screening.  Show that information to your doctor!  

squirmingitch Veteran

I agree with cyclinglady.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nony
    Newest Member
    Nony
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.