Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Possible DH?


tiggergi

Recommended Posts

tiggergi Newbie

Hello,

I am new to this forum and thought I would finally ask my questions. in August of 2015 I started eating healthy. Meat, veggies, no refined sugars. Cut out soda and candy and the junk. I also cut way down on bread. I was eating a sandwich a day for lunch and now I take chicken. I still eat noodles and bread with spaghetti, but not much of the bread at all. I think I am generally healthy. I have always been very low on iron, tired during the day, my nails are especially brittle the last few months, hair is fine, I am gassy when I eat but only bloated if I over eat. Bathroom habits seem to be normal.

In early April of last year I broke out in a rash on my elbows. Skin colored, just these bumps that were water filled blisters. They itched really bad, but not horrid like I am reading here. If I popped them the itch would be gone until they filled back up which only takes a few minutes. Both elbows identical until I basically scratched them to scabs, but more would just appear. Every once in awhile I would get one on the back of my hand at my knuckles. It was a tiny water filled blister that hurt like I had burned myself, and itched horrendously, but just one. These are the worst of all of them!

In October I went to my GP and she didn't even look at the blisters. Said I needed to have a blood allergy work up. I told her that from what I had read I thought it might be gluten. The only thing that baffles me is that I cut gluten out for about a week and there was no change. When I ate it again, I didn't have any severe reaction within 48 hours like I was expecting. Everything just stayed status quo. I am also tired all of the time, even with 8 hours of sleep but that has always been blamed on low iron my whole life. So she tested me for lots of things and everything came back normal. Even my iron level which has never been normal was. I asked about the gluten and she said no, that was not it as she tested me for wheat and I am not allergic. She told me to check my soaps and detergents, etc.

Fast forward to February and I am so sick of this. Rash has never gone away. So 3 weeks ago today I completely cut out gluten again. This time, after a week and a half the rash started to go away. After 2 weeks it is all gone - YAAY! Now I am at the end of week 3 and Saturday I wake up with 2 blisters on one elbow. I pop them and try hard not to scratch and by mid day they disappear. Sunday I wake up, elbows are fine, but I have one stinging blister on my knuckle. Was still there today (Monday) but now after popping it 3 or 4 times it looks like it is going away.

Does this sound like DH? My plan had been that if I got better by eliminating gluten then I just would not ever eat it again. I don't really need a diagnosis, I just want the rash to go away. It seems like it is from what I have read here. I know that I should probably just eat a bunch of gluten and see what happens, but I am afraid that it will just be mild and slow to happen so that I can't tell if that is truly it. I am frustrated as I am not getting the clear reactions that you guys get. :( So far as I know no one in my family has ever had celiacs. My mother died of complications from diabetes, but no rashes or malnutrition while she was sick that we were aware of. Everyone else is healthy so far as I know. Should I stay off gluten and just see if I stay mostly rash free? Should I eat gluten and see what happens? I am not sure where to go from here. I thought this would be more clear cut. Just not sure what to do now.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome to the forum!  

Okay, I do not have DH, but I have a few suggestions.  

Read through our forum's DH section for advice and tips.  You are in a bit of a quandary because you have gone gluten free.  It is best to get tested (blood test, intestinal and skin biopsies) prior to going gluten free.  It is best because all the celiac tests will be invalid if you have been off gluten for even as little as two weeks.   A gluten challenge requires two weeks of consuming gluten prior to an intestinal biopsy and 8 to 12 weeks for a blood test.  I am not sure about a skin biopsy but tissue needs to be taken,not on but away,  from the blister (see the DH section).  I understand that it is hard to find a dermatologist who know exactly how to biopsy for DH.  You can see that your own GP is clueless.

So, DH is awful.  The itching is described as unbearable.  It follows no pattern after a gluten exposure.  You could be fine for weeks and then have a breakout and never figure out the gluten source.   It takes a really long time for antibodies to resolve when they are in the skin.  

The only way to know for sure that you have DH is to get tested as your rash could be anything.  But you have had some relief.  Only you can decide what is best for you.  But if you continue to be gluten free, you should stick to the diet for six months or longer.  It can take a year or more for the DH rash to stop flaring up.  

I hope this helps.  We do have a few DH members.  You might hear from them.  In the meantime read....read....read all that you can on the subject.  Look too, for a celiac savvy dermatologist or GI in case you do want testing.  Any MD can run the blood tests, but again, you have to be consuming gluten.

I wish you well.  

P.S.  Celiac disease/DH is an autoimmune disorder and not an allergy.  So, a negative on a wheat allergy test means you are not allergic to wheat.  It does not rule out celiac disease.  

Open Original Shared Link

 

tiggergi Newbie

Thank you Cyclinglady. Yes, I really should have done more before I stopped eating gluten but I was not at all sure what to do and honestly figured that stopping it wouldn't work. I have learned a lot in the last few weeks and I still have soo much more to understand. I think that I need to find a good dermatologist that knows a lot about gluten. I really do appreciate the time you took to respond. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Believe me, I get what drives people to self-diagnose or to have to deal with inadequate medical advice.  My hubby went Gluten Free 16 years ago based on the poor advice of my allergist and his GP.  It worked though, but we will never know if he has celiac disease or not.  He will tell you that I get way more support from medical, family and friends with a formal diagnosis (four years ago for me).    But will he do a gluten challenge?  No way.  We know it makes him sick.  He can't work, we don't eat!  

Keep advocating for your health.  You are not crazy.  You are not a hypochondriac.  You deserve to feel well!  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.