Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Unusual test results & Endoscopy rant

Vanillabean

Recommended Posts

Vanillabean Apprentice
Vanillabean
Posted
  • Author
16 minutes ago, frieze said:

 

Thanks Frieze, I'm planning on filing a complaint in the next few days. 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted
On 4/26/2017 at 8:36 AM, Vanillabean said:

By the way, I got my biopsy pathology report and the doctor took 2 biopsies, not the recommended 4-6. It says no "significant villous blunting not seen." I don't know if I should laugh or cry---so frustrating. 

 

This seems odd.  No SIGNIFICANT villous blunting.  Was there mild villous blunting?  Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes?

Vanillabean Apprentice
Vanillabean
Posted
  • Author
1 hour ago, RMJ said:

This seems odd.  No SIGNIFICANT villous blunting.  Was there mild villous blunting?  Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes?

Oh, it definitely struck me as very odd! It also says "no significant increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes". That's their favorite word I guess! 

My blood work pre-biopsy also showed increase lymphocytes and my primary doctor said it usually means increased inflammation.

Doing all the things I can now---filing a complaint, I've emailed my doctors to tell them I'm upset and don't think I received proper care, I'm in the process of trying to see a naturopath that diagnosed a friend of a friend w celiac. I'm going to see if i can get the other blood work done with them---and I've been gluten free for a week and a half! 

 

 

Jmg Mentor
Jmg
Posted
1 hour ago, Vanillabean said:

I'm going to see if i can get the other blood work done with them---and I've been gluten free for a week and a half! 

If you're going to continue to push for a diagnosis stay on gluten! A break could lead to a false negative.

It's a lot harder to go off it and then go back on... 

 

gertrude Rookie
gertrude
Posted

I got my biopsy results back today and would love to hear what y'all think because I'm confused.

Just a reminder of where I was at before the biopsy results: I had a positive EMA test, negative ttg test, and positive genetic test for celiac. Today, the doctor told me the biopsy did not show celiac. As a result of the positive genetic test, he said I could still develop celiac in the future but he doesn't think it is celiac right now.

I asked for a copy of my test results. The pathology report says, "Overt diagnostic morphological features of sprue are not seen in this biopsy." But it does say it shows duodenitis, patchy minimal intraepithelial lymphocytosis, and mild villous blunting. To me, that suggests latent or early celiac. Am I right?

Why would these results not be diagnostic of celiac?

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted
16 minutes ago, gertrude said:

I got my biopsy results back today and would love to hear what y'all think because I'm confused.

Just a reminder of where I was at before the biopsy results: I had a positive EMA test, negative ttg test, and positive genetic test for celiac. Today, the doctor told me the biopsy did not show celiac. As a result of the positive genetic test, he said I could still develop celiac in the future but he doesn't think it is celiac right now.

I asked for a copy of my test results. The pathology report says, "Overt diagnostic morphological features of sprue are not seen in this biopsy." But it does say it shows duodenitis, patchy minimal intraepithelial lymphocytosis, and mild villous blunting. To me, that suggests latent or early celiac. Am I right?

Why would these results not be diagnostic of celiac?

The reason they are not diagnostic (according to the AMA) of Celiac is because you don't have enough severe damage for them to bless you with a diagnosis.  Some doctors will only diagnose Celiac with Marsh III damage...which is pretty much after the villi are gone and you are pretty miserable, if symptomatic.  Let's see.......your duodenum is irritated/inflamed, you have increased, patchy IEL's and some mild blunting of the villi.  Now, this can happen for other reasons BUT you have a positive EMA and symptoms that can be attributed to Celiac. You also have positive genetic results so we know you have the ability to trip for it. I find it very strange that they did the EMA and not the complete panel because the EMA is the most expensive test to do and it is generally only done if the tTg and other antibody testing is positive.

I think it is time for a second opinion with someone more versed in Celiac Disease.  I think you have early Celiac so if you continue to eat gluten, then maybe you will have enough damage down the road for these geniuses to find.  :o  I am not sure I would do that myself because I really hate feeling like crap.  I did  that for too many years and wouldn't wish it on anyone.  I guess they are ignoring the positive EMA???????  Just remember if you want a solid diagnosis, you'll have to keep eating gluten but take it from someone who had Celiac, went to docs for years with no results or even mention of Celiac Disease and ended up with a lot of collateral damage from being undiagnosed for so long.  That biopsy report is telling you that you need to look further into this and not ignore it.....which I don't think you would anyway!

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

Here is the report of my biopsy, although my biopsy was after 3 years of trying to be gluten free.  Combined with serology I was diagnosed as celiac.

"Duodenal mucosa with patchy mild increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes and focal mild villous blunting."

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


gertrude Rookie
gertrude
Posted

Thanks for your comments, RMJ and Gemini. Very helpful.

I've been pretty disappointed since my appointment on Monday because I really wanted a firm diagnosis. I'm okay eating gluten free on my own, but it would be easier to have family and friends (and other social settings) take it seriously if I could say firmly that I had been diagnosed with celiac. I do plan to eat gluten-free for at least six months and see how that affects my symptoms. I have a couple of symptomatic family members who are now going to be tested, so I am hoping if they are able to get a firm diagnosis, I can feel more confident about a lifelong gluten-free diet.

From the scholarly literature I have been reading, a positive EMA and negative biopsy could still indicate either celiac disease or a "very high" chance of developing celiac later on. So I think a gluten-free diet is my answer. I'm just not certain how vigilant to be about cross-contamination, etc., without a firm diagnosis.

ironictruth Proficient
ironictruth
Posted
On ‎5‎/‎1‎/‎2017 at 4:25 PM, gertrude said:

I got my biopsy results back today and would love to hear what y'all think because I'm confused.

Just a reminder of where I was at before the biopsy results: I had a positive EMA test, negative ttg test, and positive genetic test for celiac. Today, the doctor told me the biopsy did not show celiac. As a result of the positive genetic test, he said I could still develop celiac in the future but he doesn't think it is celiac right now.

I asked for a copy of my test results. The pathology report says, "Overt diagnostic morphological features of sprue are not seen in this biopsy." But it does say it shows duodenitis, patchy minimal intraepithelial lymphocytosis, and mild villous blunting. To me, that suggests latent or early celiac. Am I right?

Why would these results not be diagnostic of celiac?

There are a lot of docs who would put you in the potential celiac range which means, as mentioned above, things could get a lot worse if you continue eating gluten.

Marsh 1 and 2 scoring can absolutely go on to become Marsh 3/4, the official "celiac" diagnosis.  BUT, there are limited studies on this because ultimately, what researcher is going to NOT recommend a gluten free diet to someone with at least one positive blood test and some damage simply so they can track the changes via endoscopy down the road? Tracking folks in your position would prove difficult and unethical to even suggest.

My brother was anemic as a young child which eventually resolved. He went through his adult years just fine. He started experiencing some odd symptoms for a couple of years in his late 30's. It was not until he lost roughly 20 pounds in 4-5 months that they finally referred him to GI. Diagnosis? seronegative celiac.

Increased IEL can occur from a lot of different things, SIBO, aspirin, etc.  It is highly unusual to have a positive EMA and negative TTG but it does occur. And please note, that there are at least 3 different kinds of TTG that I am aware of, and I am a peon with no medical background. Labs only test for one type. So it is entirely possible you test positive to some other random TTG test no one will start using for at least another decade.

It MAY, be worth your while, for your peace of mind, to reach out to a celiac disease research center to ask if they would be willing to review your pathology slides. You can have them sent directly to the research center, along with faxing your labs and any genetic testing you may have had done.

Good luck!

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted
3 hours ago, gertrude said:

Thanks for your comments, RMJ and Gemini. Very helpful.

I've been pretty disappointed since my appointment on Monday because I really wanted a firm diagnosis. I'm okay eating gluten free on my own, but it would be easier to have family and friends (and other social settings) take it seriously if I could say firmly that I had been diagnosed with celiac. I do plan to eat gluten-free for at least six months and see how that affects my symptoms. I have a couple of symptomatic family members who are now going to be tested, so I am hoping if they are able to get a firm diagnosis, I can feel more confident about a lifelong gluten-free diet.

From the scholarly literature I have been reading, a positive EMA and negative biopsy could still indicate either celiac disease or a "very high" chance of developing celiac later on. So I think a gluten-free diet is my answer. I'm just not certain how vigilant to be about cross-contamination, etc., without a firm diagnosis.

The only people who don't have to worry about cc are those half ass, fad dieters.  With a positive EMA, positive genetic screen and an inflamed duodenum, along with mild blunting of the villi, you need to be careful like we all do.  In 6 months of following a strict gluten-free diet, go back and have them re-do the EMA. If it's negative, that should convince you. 

Do not worry about what anyone else has to say about what you do.  You don't have to please anyone but yourself and guard your own health. It doesn't matter about convincing relatives to be tested, either, because if they are anything like many of our families, they won't get tested. They won't want to hear about it....even if you had the biopsy slides to show them.  I still have family members, after 12 years, that don't want to hear it and they are symptomatic or have associated issues they need strong meds to somewhat control. I just say.......'How's that workin' for ya"?  ;)  I take crap from no one with regards to my diet.  :ph34r:

gertrude Rookie
gertrude
Posted

Thanks for your help and comments, Gemini and ironictruth. This whole experience has been very confusing for me, and this forum has provided me with a lot of comfort and answers.

ironictruth Proficient
ironictruth
Posted
20 hours ago, gertrude said:

Thanks for your help and comments, Gemini and ironictruth. This whole experience has been very confusing for me, and this forum has provided me with a lot of comfort and answers.

Here is one example of what I mentioned above.

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Victoria5289 Apprentice
Victoria5289
Posted
On 4/30/2017 at 10:49 AM, RMJ said:

This seems odd.  No SIGNIFICANT villous blunting.  Was there mild villous blunting?  Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes?

How about checking for aka fibroid issues or may want check a tumor of some kind

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,798
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Gracie B
    Newest Member
    Gracie B
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Samanthaeileen1
      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

      By Samanthaeileen1 · Posted

      Hello there! New to celiac community, although I have lots of family in it.  My two year old was just diagnosed with celiac disease based on symptoms and bloodwork.  symptoms (swollen belly, stomach hurting, gagging all the time, regular small vomit, fatigue, irritability, bum hurting, etc) she got tests at 18 months and her bloodwork was normal. She just got tested again at 2 1/2  because her symptoms were getting worse and these were her results :   Tissue Transglutaminase Ab, IgA 58.8 Unit/mL (High) Endomysial Antibody IgA Titer 1:5 titer (Abnormal)   Gliadin Antibody IgA < 1.0 Unit/mL Gliadin Antibody IgG 8.5 Unit/mL Immunoglobulin A 66 mg/dL Her regular pediatrician diagnosed her with celiac and told us to put her on the strict gluten free diet and that we wouldn’t do an endoscopy since it was so positive and she is so little (26lbs and two years old). I’m honestly happy with this decision, but my family is saying I should push and get an endoscopy for her. It just seems unnecessary and an endoscopy has its own risks that make me nervous. I’m certain she has celiac especially with it running in mine and my husbands family. We are now thinking of testing ourselves and our 5 year old as well.  anyways what would y’all recommend though? Should we ask for an endoscopy and a GI referral? (We are moving soon in 5 months so I think that’s part of why she didn’t refer us to GI)    
    • olivia11
      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      By olivia11 · Posted

      This is really helpful  I had not considered sugar alcohols or inulin as triggers. Thanks for the practical baking tips too color coding and baking G F first makes a lot of sense. This is really helpful  I had not considered sugar alcohols or inulin as triggers. Thanks for the practical baking tips too color coding and baking G F first makes a lot of sense. This is really helpful  I had not considered sugar alcohols or inulin as triggers. Thanks for the practical baking tips too color coding and baking G F first makes a lot of sense.   You are not confusing yourself  you have got it right. Thiamax (TTFD) plus a B-complex, and if you want benfotiamine, the Life Extension formula covers that at ~100 mg.
    • olivia11
      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      By olivia11 · Posted

      High fiber can definitely cause sudden GI distress especially if it’s a new addition but accidental gluten exposure can feel similar. Keeping a simple food/symptom log and introducing new gluten-free foods one at a time can really help you spot the pattern. This is really helpful  I had not considered sugar alcohols or inulin as triggers. Thanks for the practical baking tips too; color-coding and baking gluten-free first makes a lot of sense. This is really helpful  I had not considered sugar alcohols or inulin as triggers. Thanks for the practical baking tips too; color-coding and baking gluten-free first makes a lot of sense. This is really helpful  I had not considered sugar alcohols or inulin as triggers. Thanks for the practical baking tips too; color-coding and baking gluten-free first makes a lot of sense. This is really helpful  I had not considered sugar alcohols or inulin as triggers. Thanks for the practical baking tips too; color-coding and baking gluten-free first makes a lot of sense.
    • xxnonamexx
      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      By xxnonamexx · Posted

      sorry a bit confused so I should take my B complex along with Objective Nutrients Thiamax for TTFD but what about a Benfotiamine to take. The Life extensions contains Benfotiamine and Thiamine together or im confusing myself. I am trying to see if I take Thiamax what should I take for Benfotiamine. Thanks EDITING after further research I see ones water soluble ones fat soluble. So I guess 100MG as you suggested of Life Extension contains Benfotiamine and Thiamine Hydrochloride. and the Objective Nutrients Thiamax contains TTFD.     would work for me.
    • Rogol72
      Build muscle back feeling weak?

      By Rogol72 · Posted

      I put on over 12kg by eating protein with every meal, 3 to 5 times a day. Eggs, Chicken, Tuna, Turkey etc. I stay away from too much red meat as it can be inflammatory. Scott is correct. I've come across a bunch of Coeliac PT's on Tiktok and Instagram. They all say the same thing, the key is getting enough protein and consistency.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.