Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I get tested


crumbles

Recommended Posts

crumbles Newbie

Hello everyone: I'm hoping someone can answer my questions:

I was diagnosed with MS about 10 years ago. I went gluten free nine years ago after several other people with MS mentioned that going gluten free helped their symptoms. I tried it and yes, my MS symptoms improved.

Fast forward to now.

I was referred to an allergist for stomach issues and stool leakage. I told my neurologist I thought it was gluten exposure as it was episodic. 

I tested positive (skin test) for wheat and a couple of other foods. 

Dr suggested a celiac blood panel. 

Since I've been gluten free for so long, is it likely to show positive? I have had a few accidental exposures over the last year or so and they have been due to either restaurants issues (they swear it's gluten free but my stomach says otherwise) or else I failed to read the labels properly.

(I'm only quibbling about the blood work as I have to pay for it 100%)

Thanks. 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
1 hour ago, crumbles said:

Hello everyone: I'm hoping someone can answer my questions:

I was diagnosed with MS about 10 years ago. I went gluten free nine years ago after several other people with MS mentioned that going gluten free helped their symptoms. I tried it and yes, my MS symptoms improved.

Fast forward to now.

I was referred to an allergist for stomach issues and stool leakage. I told my neurologist I thought it was gluten exposure as it was episodic. 

I tested positive (skin test) for wheat and a couple of other foods. 

Dr suggested a celiac blood panel. 

Since I've been gluten free for so long, is it likely to show positive? I have had a few accidental exposures over the last year or so and they have been due to either restaurants issues (they swear it's gluten free but my stomach says otherwise) or else I failed to read the labels properly.

(I'm only quibbling about the blood work as I have to pay for it 100%)

Thanks. 

 

 

Are you a gambler?  All celiac disease testing requires a patient to be on a full gluten diet.  For those who have been gluten free a challenge can be done.  Gluten must e consumed daily for 8 to 12 weeks (2 to 4 prior to an endoscopy).  Why so long?  It can take some people that long for antibodies to reach the bloodstream.  

Open Original Shared Link

You had a positive on the allergy test.  So, you have a confirmed wheat allergy.  Is there a reason you want to rule out or confirm celiac disease?  It sounds like you have been doing great on the diet with only a few mis-haps.  

squirmingitch Veteran

I will warn you that many, most, who do the gluten challenge for testing find their reactions to be so much more severe than they ever had prior to going gluten free. Some get so sick, they can not complete the challenge. 

An endoscopy requires a 2 week challenge as opposed to the 8-12 weeks for the celiac serum panel.

I have had a couple friends with MS & quite frankly, I would be terribly worried what would happen to you if you did a gluten challenge. 

crumbles Newbie

Thanks for the replies. Over the years, I've had people tell me that I should get a stomach biopsy and go back to eating gluten in order to get tested.

I decided a long time ago, I would never get a stomach biopsy as I wouldn't put myself (and the MS) through it. 

I COULDN'T go back on gluten as some of the stomach cramps I have had (when I've had a label mishap/restaurant mishap from a supposedly gluten free menu ) have been horrendous. I wouldn't knowingly do that to myself and I seriously doubt I could make a week let alone two weeks or 8-12 weeks! It might kill me or close to it.

I've decided to pass on the bloodwork as I got a positive on the wheat allergy, so that answers a lot of my questions, knocks aside the skeptic doctors and explains the stool. 

Since posting my question, the allergist told me not to bother with the celiac blood panel as I've been gluten free for so long with just a few mishaps. He said it's unlikely to show anything and that it won't change what I eat so why bother. 

Ironically, turns out I'm also allergic to beef which I haven't eaten in over three decades! 

Anyway, thanks everyone, I really appreciate the support.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.