Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I be retested?


RachelM

Recommended Posts

RachelM Newbie

I’m 16 years old, just before I turned 14, I had blood tests done for a separate reason and found out that I am slightly anemic. I wasn’t informed at the time, but recently a family member has been diagnosed with Celiac disease and so everyone in the family have been tested. However, when I went to the doctor to get tested for celiac, I was told that my previous blood tests were also tested for celiac, but it came back as normal, so I didn’t get tested again. I have pretty much every symptom and before I seen the doctor I was determined I had it, and part of me still is. Would my tests from 2 years ago still be valid? Or could I have “picked up” celiac in the last 2 years? I’ve read many posts about this and many people have mentioned NCGI, would NCGI be picked up on a blood test? Should I revisit my doctor and persuade them to give me another test?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
5 hours ago, RachelM said:

I’m 16 years old, just before I turned 14, I had blood tests done for a separate reason and found out that I am slightly anemic. I wasn’t informed at the time, but recently a family member has been diagnosed with Celiac disease and so everyone in the family have been tested. However, when I went to the doctor to get tested for celiac, I was told that my previous blood tests were also tested for celiac, but it came back as normal, so I didn’t get tested again. I have pretty much every symptom and before I seen the doctor I was determined I had it, and part of me still is. Would my tests from 2 years ago still be valid? Or could I have “picked up” celiac in the last 2 years? I’ve read many posts about this and many people have mentioned NCGI, would NCGI be picked up on a blood test? Should I revisit my doctor and persuade them to give me another test?

Hey Rachel!  I am glad that you are advocating for your health.  

You can develop celiac disease at anytime in your life.  It is recommended that you get tested every two years or so, if you have a first-degree relative (e.g.  sibling or parent) even if symptom free.  So, you can get retested and maybe you should since a family member (even if it is a cousin) was recently diagnosed.  There is no test for NCGI, instead celiac disease is firmly ruled out before a NCGI diagnosis is given (unfortunately).  

Has your anemia resolved?  That should be rechecked until the doctor sees a normal result.  What kind of anemia?

This is a good time for you and your parents to keep and maintain your medical records for life.  It is your right.  See if the complete celiac panel was given.  Sometimes they just run the TTG which is good but does not catch all celiacs.  

Let us know if you need more information.  Try to stick to reputable sites that are not selling you something.  The University of Chicago has great information on celiac disease.   

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.