Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Boardline and Blood work negative


boarderline??

Recommended Posts

boarderline?? Newbie

Hi I'm new to the forum and need some help please.  I have had RA and Sjorens for over 6 years.  Also anemic and while following that up they did a lower and upper scope and biopsies.  The biopsy came back boarderline for Celiac disease.  Bloos test was done and while waiting for that I started to do alot of research about the disease and seemed from what I read that the blood work would come back positive.  Nope couldn't be that easy the blood work came back negative.  So now I'm not sure which is the most accurate?  I figure I should just follow that diet and see what happens but I have read it could take up to 2 years to see real results and doubt I could do that without an actual answer.   Please help!!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced

 Are you on any immuno-suppressive drugs for your RA/Sjogren's?  Some of them can interfere with blood testing results.  If not, then it is entirely possible for blood work to be negative and biopsy positive.......that happens to a lot of people.  Neither one is more accurate than the other as damaged villi can be missed on biopsy if damage is patchy.  I am not even sure what borderline means on a biopsy report.  You either have damage or you don't.

Having both RA and especially Sjogren's puts you into the higher risk category for Celiac.  I also have Sjogren's.  Could you post the biopsy results, if you are comfortable with doing that?

 

boarderline?? Newbie

I am on Leflunomode, Nabumetone, hydroxycloroquine and Pilocarpine.  Not sure if any of these would interact with the test or not.  I know I fasted the day before for the scope and hadn't eaten much before I got the blood drawn so not sure if that could mess with it or not.  I don't have any of the reports for the biopsy the doctor just called and said it was boarderline and ordered the blood work.  Feel like I have been left hanging  by them just got a call from a someone in the doctors office (not the Dr) telling me that the result was negative and when I asked if that meant I could have gluetin she responded yes.  Dummy me didn't ask to talk to the Dr

Gemini Experienced

Two of the four drugs listed are immuno-suppressive drugs.  Leflunomode and Plaquenil are the two so there is a strong possibility that either of these 2 (or both) could have affected antibody testing.  If you are testing an antibody level in autoimmune testing (Celiac) and take meds that suppress the immune response, testing results may be useless.  I am not saying for sure that they will but the odds are higher that they might.  Most doctors don't even take this into account, which always boggles my mind.

I think you need a new GI doctor because the one you have is not doing you any good.  You can ask them for the biopsy report and post it here.  You have a right to all medical testing results.  I would not go back to eating gluten unless you want to be re-tested by someone more competent.  Having these 2 diseases, plus anemia, makes the odds of you having Celiac much higher than not.  You could also do gene testing to see if you carry any of the main Celiac genes but that will not tell you if you have it.  It just tells you whether you have the genetic make-up to trip for it.  You do sound like a strong possibility for Celiac, though.

Many people with RA notice much pain improvement when following a gluten-free diet......if you have Celiac.  When I went gluten free after diagnosis, my Sjogren's symptoms improved.  I take no systemic meds for it, although I do use Restasis eye drops for my dry eyes.  Don't get me wrong, Sjogren's still sucks big lemons but things stabilized for me. We'll see what happens as I continue to age......:rolleyes:

frieze Community Regular

Gem, check into Vitamin D, into dry eye.

 

Gemini Experienced
14 hours ago, frieze said:

Gem, check into Vitamin D, into dry eye.

 

I take a lot of Vitamin D and my levels are the highest they have ever been.  They have gone from the twenties to 62 so I keep plugging away at that.  I just have a lot of collateral damage from going so long as an undiagnosed Celiac. I also take 2,000 mg per day of omega fish oil and flax seed oil, which is supposed to specifically help with dry eye.  This is all doing wonders for my good cholesterol but my eyes can still be problematic during allergy season.  I am sure if I didn’t do all this things would be much worse but I wish I could bump it up to the next level of better. I’m sure the aging thing isn’t helping matters any........<_<

If there is something I am missing here, please let me know! 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,197
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.