Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Low positive tTG blood work, negative biopsy, doctor says eat gluten-free...feeling crummy tonight


kg51

Recommended Posts

kg51 Explorer

Okay, I'm going to try to be concise, but that's not my strength.

I've had a lifetime of on and off symptoms--more off than on--and most recently has been intermittent nausea, bloating, and stomach pain some days. I've unintentionally lost 20 lbs (15%) since the beginning of 2017.

Blood work 3/2018: positive tTG 19.8 (range <15); normal immunoglobin A: 216 (range 70-312); negative IgG, IgA, and EMA.

From everything I've read the only non-celiac reasons for tTG elevation are end-stage heart failure, liver failure, or other autoimmune diseases--none of which are indicated by my physical exam, symptoms, or other blood work (comp metabolic panel, CBC w/diff, ANA, TSH, and lipid panel).

Though as I review my other blood work and Google madly these values are possibly indicating I'm close to anemic, but not quite...?

Hemoglobin 12.3 (range 12.0 - 16.0) near low; MCV 83.8 (range 81.0 - 100.0) near low; MCH 26.5 (range 27.0 - 33.2) low; MPV 11.2 (range 7.0 - 11.5) near high

The rest was pretty average-looking.

And something that could indicate some inflammation...? Monocytes 0.63 (range 0.10 - 0.60) high

And finally, my vitamin D was in the "insufficient" range...Vit D 24.11 (range 30.0 - 100.0)

ANYWAY...

Endoscopy and biopsy 4/2018: Visually healthy upon scope, biopsy says negative for duodenum villous damage, "mild chronic inflammation" in the stomach/antrum/body, negative H. pylori.

I started eating gluten-free immediately after the endoscopy before the biopsy results were in. I felt pretty good (no stomach pain/bloating, but that could have been coincidental since things are so on/off for me).

The biopsy results came in and the GI doctor said "there's no indication of celiac since there is no damage in the duodenum. Inflammation in the stomach is normal because it's acidic in there. Eat a gluten-free diet. If the weight loss continues schedule another appointment."

But to me--and perhaps I'm reading too much into it--there's

1) no damage (yet?) or
2) it’s patchy and was missed or
3) my blood work was falsely positive

...Right? The GI is recommending eating gluten-free no matter what, but he kept mentioning “non-celiac gluten sensitivity” at the first appointment which I feel wouldn’t be applicable with an elevated tTG value. If I feel better eating gluten-free it doesn't make sense that having an elevated tTG would be non-celiac anything.

But then I go and get one of my bloated/painful stomach aches tonight (exactly 7 days eating gluten-free) and I know I didn't eat anything different...literally ate leftovers.

OKAY...

So to me I interpret all of this as either "yes I have celiac" or alternatively I guess it could mean "potential celiac" and either way I am opting for a gluten-free diet. Or there's the chance it was falsely elevated but I can't seem to find that that's a thing? I'm so bothered that I feel crappy tonight and am still feeling confused.

I don't even know what my questions are. I guess...what now?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Trial the diet for six months.  It takes that long and for some even longer, to see real improvement based on member comments.  Expect set backs like you have experienced.  It is common.   Read the Newbie 101 section located at the top of the “Coping” section or research on your own.  If you do not feel that you are improving (and get that TTG test retaken), look for other illnesses that might have elevated your TTG (e.g. Crohn’s).  

 

kg51 Explorer
7 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

Trial the diet for six months.  It takes that long and for some even longer, to see real improvement based on member comments.  Expect set backs like you have experienced.  It is common.   Read the Newbie 101 section located at the top of the “Coping” section or research on your own.  If you do not feel that you are improving (and get that TTG test retaken), look for other illnesses that might have elevated your TTG (e.g. Crohn’s).  

 

That's what I'm thinking--giving it some months and continuing my food/symptom log and seeing how things go. I am close enough to University of Chicago's Celiac Disease Center to make an appointment with their doctors for a second opinion, but I'm not sure if that's worth my time/money. I guess I can just plug away at eating gluten-free and see how it goes? I feel like I have no answer right now and don't know how much I need to worry about other potential stuff.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Just worry about one thing at a time.  My hubby has been gluten free for 17 years and he does not have a formal diagnosis.  He went gluten free per the poor advice of two medical doctors.  But the diet worked!  There is no way he would do a gluten challenge.  I can not blame him.  

The goal is to feel better.  While it is a shame that your case is not so clear cut, at least you are moving forward.  

Now the hard part, being patient and waiting to see results!  ?

1desperateladysaved Proficient

I took a very long time one of the reasons is that my body has trouble detoxing.  (MTHFR gene).  Going gluten free did help.

kg51 Explorer
38 minutes ago, 1desperateladysaved said:

I took a very long time one of the reasons is that my body has trouble detoxing.  (MTHFR gene).  Going gluten free did help.

It took a very long time before you noticed a good remission of symptoms? Do you know about how long? I guess I'm just bummed that I had a (possibly coincidentally) good week gluten-free and then a bad night. I wanted things to be cut-and-dry better from then onward.

1 hour ago, cyclinglady said:

Just worry about one thing at a time.  My hubby has been gluten free for 17 years and he does not have a formal diagnosis.  He went gluten free per the poor advice of two medical doctors.  But the diet worked!  There is no way he would do a gluten challenge.  I can not blame him.  

The goal is to feel better.  While it is a shame that your case is not so clear cut, at least you are moving forward.  

Now the hard part, being patient and waiting to see results!  ?

LOL, I'm pretty good at worrying about all of the things simultaneously! You are right though. The goal is to feel better regardless of an official diagnosis or not. I need to be more patient and keep moving forward...still a little disappointed that I got my hopes up with my (possibly coincidentally) feel-good-gluten-free week and then had a bad night.

1desperateladysaved Proficient

I took a very long time one of the reasons is that my body has trouble detoxing.  (MTHFR gene).  Going gluten free did help.

I can't say how long because I had so many things going besides celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

Expect things to be a roller coaster for a while. You'll have good days & bad days, good weeks, & bad weeks. That's normal until you heal. 

Now I want to revisit something here. How many biopsies were done & from what areas? Do you have the report? 

20 hours ago, kg51 said:

The biopsy results came in and the GI doctor said "there's no indication of celiac since there is no damage in the duodenum. Inflammation in the stomach is normal because it's acidic in there. Eat a gluten-free diet. If the weight loss continues schedule another appointment."

That whole bit disturbs me. First that he says no damage in the duodenum indicates no celiac. The celiac damage can occur anywhere in the entire small intestine. When flayed out, it is will cover a tennis court so there's a lot of territory  to cover in there. There should be 4-6 biopsies taken from different areas. How many did he take & from which areas? Secondly & I think the most concerning statement he made is that inflammation in the stomach is normal b/c it's acidic in there????? Seriously????? Seriously???? Um, then every single person on the planet would have inflammation in the stomach. That's just not correct! Our stomachs are designed to handle the acid without getting inflamed. If there's inflammation, there's something causing it & it's not normal stomach acid! 

kg51 Explorer
29 minutes ago, squirmingitch said:

Now I want to revisit something here. How many biopsies were done & from what areas? Do you have the report? 

I do have the report, and I know I asked how he took the biopsies. I can't remember the proper term, but he described "one snip takes two samples," so every two samples were taken from the same area. Here's what I have...

 

Specimens:
 
A. - Tissue, Duodenal biopsy                                                         
B. - Tissue, Gastric antrum and body biopsy  
 
Final Diagnosis
 
A. Duodenum, Biopsy:

Negative for significant pathologic abnormality, duodenal mucosa (negative for villous architectural distortion, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, significant inflammation and neoplasm). 

B. Stomach, Antrum & Body, Biopsy:

Mild chronic inflammation, nonspecific, gastric non-oxyntic and oxyntic mucosa. 

Negative for Helicobacter pylori-type microorganisms (by properly controlled immunoperoxidase method). 
 
Comments:
 
A.  CD3 is requested to delineate the intraepithelial component of T-lymphocytes. By properly controlled immunohistochemical method, CD3 presents a normal complement of intraepithelial T-lymphocytes.

B.  H.  pylori immunostaining is performed to rule out the presence of H. pylori microorganisms.
 
Gross Description:
 
Specimen A: Submitted in formalin, labeled with the patient's name and "Duodenum, Rule Out Celiac Sprue, Biopsies" consists of 6 tan fragments of tissue, measuring 7 x 6 x 2 mm in aggregate. All is entirely submitted in A1 cassette.

Specimen B: Submitted in formalin, labeled with the patient's name and "Gastric, Antrum and Body, Rule Out H.Pylori, Biopsies" consists of 4 tan fragments of tissue, measuring 6 x 6 x 2 mm in aggregate. All is entirely submitted in B1 cassette.
 
 
...I'm glad I'm not the only one raising an eyebrow at this. I guess the confirmation there is helping me feel better.
 
I was going through University of Chicago's Q&As and found a lot of information...
 
 
Source for the Q&As: Open Original Shared Link
 
Q. My body shouldn’t be producing any antibodies if I only have a non-celiac gluten sensitivity, correct?
A. Correct. If you have “non-celiac gluten sensitivity”, then by definition antibodies found in celiac patients must not be present.

Q. What does the term “potential celiac” mean?
A. A patient who is a “potential celiac” has positive serology (including the highly specific anti-Endomysium antibodies), possibly has symptoms, and has a negative biopsy. A potential celiac may or may not be put on a gluten-free diet, though we typically lean toward recommending the diet even in those potential celiacs who have no symptoms. Early data indicates that, left untreated, celiac disease will develop in the majority of cases.


Q. What are the chances of having a high tTG and a negative biopsy—even though I have a child who was biopsy-diagnosed with celiac—and still being negative for the disease?
A. It’s possible to be truly negative with these facts, especially if the tTG are only mildly elevated. Also check the more specific EMA test. If it’s positive, we would conclude you’re a potential celiac, which means the disease is simply waiting to explode, and we’d suggest a gluten-free diet.

Q. What is an EMA blood test?
A. The anti-endomysial antibody test (EMAIgA), EMA-IgA, is very specific for celiac disease. It’s estimated that a person with an elevated titer of EMA is almost assured of having celiac disease. However, the EMA test isn’t as sensitive as the tTG-IgA test; about 5-10% of celiacs do not have a positive EMA test.
 
 
squirmingitch Veteran

OK, so the way I'm reading that, & I am by no means an expert, is that he actually did take 6 biopsies but it doesn't specify which portions of the duodenum he took them from. They usually do so this is odd from the normal.

Yes, I'm sorry, I did not address the positive blood at all. With non celiac gluten sensitivity (intolerance), you don't have elevated numbers on any of the celiac serum panel. There is NO test at the present time for NCGS. You had the positive. It's entirely possible you are celiac & things just aren't showing up yet that can give you an official dx. I think you're smart enough to know the drill. You know what this all means. Give the diet a real good shot for at least 6 months. Make sure to read our Newbie 101 thread which is pinned to the top of the Coping section. That information will be invaluable to you. 

We're here for you  if you have any questions or just want to rant & stomp your feet or cry or laugh.

kg51 Explorer
11 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

OK, so the way I'm reading that, & I am by no means an expert, is that he actually did take 6 biopsies but it doesn't specify which portions of the duodenum he took them from. They usually do so this is odd from the normal.

Yes, I'm sorry, I did not address the positive blood at all. With non celiac gluten sensitivity (intolerance), you don't have elevated numbers on any of the celiac serum panel. There is NO test at the present time for NCGS. You had the positive. It's entirely possible you are celiac & things just aren't showing up yet that can give you an official dx. I think you're smart enough to know the drill. You know what this all means. Give the diet a real good shot for at least 6 months. Make sure to read our Newbie 101 thread which is pinned to the top of the Coping section. That information will be invaluable to you. 

We're here for you  if you have any questions or just want to rant & stomp your feet or cry or laugh.

I really appreciate your responses. Between my blood work, endoscopy, symptoms, and University of Chicago's Q&As, I'm inclined to call this "potential celiac," and I'm definitely sticking with the gluten-free thing and documenting closely how I feel.

I'm thinking I'll request follow up blood work in 6 months and go from there. If my tTG is down, vitamin D up, and other values don't look like borderline anemia, then I'm thinking that's pretty clear. If not...then we'll go from there I guess.

squirmingitch Veteran

You are thinking on your toes! Absolutely correct! Repeat blood work & if the #'s are down & D is up & anemia is not in question or at least the D & anemia chance have improved PLUS you're feeling somewhat better...... Now, I will say that if the tTg is down but not normal it still is going down. sometimes it takes a year or even more to reach normal levels - sometimes not - sometimes it happens very quickly just b/c we are all different.

Another thing is it can be like a roller coaster at first so you can have ups & downs - just know that. Also, if you don't make a single mistake on the diet then you might be the first person in history to get it perfect from the get go. :lol::lol: Just learn from the mistake & move on.

kg51 Explorer
15 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

You are thinking on your toes! Absolutely correct! Repeat blood work & if the #'s are down & D is up & anemia is not in question or at least the D & anemia chance have improved PLUS you're feeling somewhat better...... Now, I will say that if the tTg is down but not normal it still is going down. sometimes it takes a year or even more to reach normal levels - sometimes not - sometimes it happens very quickly just b/c we are all different.

Another thing is it can be like a roller coaster at first so you can have ups & downs - just know that. Also, if you don't make a single mistake on the diet then you might be the first person in history to get it perfect from the get go. :lol::lol: Just learn from the mistake & move on.

I'm not trying to be my own doctor, but...what the GI was saying just wasn't adding up. Thanks again for your responses.

I still think I'm viewing this as "potential celiac" or "celiac but damage wasn't found." But I guess there's also still the chance it's "falsely elevated tTG due to something else."

I'll do 6 months of strict celiac-level of gluten-free eating and see what the blood work says then. Then I wonder if--IF I'm actually on the "potential" side of things--I can "loosen up," so to speak...and try out normal level of gluten-free eating and see how I feel. If I'm feeling good eating at Chipotle and Culver's on occasion (LOL) I'll recheck blood work after 6 months of that (so 1 year total) and see where things are.

Or I guess if my blood work doesn't change at all and I'm still feeling the same then it's time to investigate what else might be brewing.

squirmingitch Veteran

Right. But I would make one change in that scenario. After the 6 months strict, then instead of going to Chipotle or Culver's, just eat a piece of bread or a cookie or something gluten at home. If you have celiac you'll be glad you were at home when you ate gluten rather than out in the world somewhere. You see, almost without fail, once a celiac has gone gluten-free, if they then eat gluten, they react sooooooooooooo much stronger than they did before they went gluten-free. So if you are celiac, then you won't want to be out at an eatery when you eat gluten.

kg51 Explorer
2 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

Right. But I would make one change in that scenario. After the 6 months strict, then instead of going to Chipotle or Culver's, just eat a piece of bread or a cookie or something gluten at home. If you have celiac you'll be glad you were at home when you ate gluten rather than out in the world somewhere. You see, almost without fail, once a celiac has gone gluten-free, if they then eat gluten, they react sooooooooooooo much stronger than they did before they went gluten-free. So if you are celiac, then you won't want to be out at an eatery when you eat gluten.

I’m sort of terrified of eating straight up gluten as a trial! I was thinking more if I could handle small amounts of cross contamination. Maybe we’ll order a gluten-free pizza delivery in 6 months, haha. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      7

      Question

    2. - fritz2 replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      7

      Question

    3. - Tuba1971 replied to Pat B's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      5

      FDA says that most drugs are gluten-free???

    4. - PA Painter replied to PA Painter's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      NCGS Diagnosis

    5. - Viroval replied to Nicbent35's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      13

      3 year old gluten intolerance?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,754
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Adair Robertson
    Newest Member
    Adair Robertson
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      endomys is, aka, "EMA" and is a celiac disease antibody test. It was negative. gliaiga is, aka, IGP-IGA, is also a celiac disease antibody test. It was negative. TRANSGLUA is, aka, TTG-IGA, another celiac disease antibody test. It was in normal range. tranigg is, aka, TTG-IGG, still another celiac disease antibody test. It was high, or above normal range. immaqnt is, I believe, what is also known as "total IGA" and at 160, looks to be in normal range since it wasn't flagged otherwise. This is a test for IGA deficiency. If someone is IGA deficient then all other IGA test scores cannot be trusted as being accurate. You are not IGA deficient. Here is a primer explaining the various tests that can be used to diagnose celiac disease: Celiac disease blood antibody testing is not valid when someone has been gluten free or eating low gluten for a significant period of time. The IGA tests are more specific for celiac disease than are the IGG tests but your slightly high TTG-IGG test score could reflect that you have celiac disease and have had low level exposure to gluten over time or a recent exposure. You could also have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • fritz2
      I'm 70, had gut issues my whole life.  15 years ago my grandchild was diagnosed with celiac.  Since I had a constant either constipation or diarrhea and what the doctors thought was fibromyalgia and other issues I decided to see what happens if I quit gluten.  I got a lot better.  BTW, 30 years ago I had head & neck cancer, the radiation destroyed my thyroid.  I suffer from chronic fatigue and have to take synthroid. A few months ago, I bought a bottle of Ice water, I was thirsty and all they had at the motel was this.  It said sugar free and had a bunch of vitamins.  I couldn't read the fine print so I thought it's safe, so I bought several bottles (it had sucralose and maltodextrin in it).  I thought one per day would be ok and it absolutely was delicious.  In the meantime, my wife found some links and bratwurst for breakfast, we didn't know it had wheat in it and we picked up a half gallon of her favorite ice cream and unknown to us they had changed the formula and added wheat.  I had several meals and several bottles before I realized something was wrong.  Did all the sugar add to the issue?   In a day, I wasn't feeling well, my joints started swelling.  In a couple days, I thought sure I had gout in both hands.  In three days, I needed help to stand up or sit down, the pain was extreme.  I went to the emergency room.  They took blood and gave me cholchistine to alleviate the gout, it did nothing.  I didn't get a report on the test.  The next week the doctor ordered more blood tests and it's all acronyms but a couple items on celiac were listed as high.  The nurse I asked about the report had no clue and the RA was negative.  This has been ongoing for over a month and only now am I able to use my hands, but it's painful. Under the Celiac labs headline it says:  endomys-Negat gliaiga-  5 gliaigg-  1 TRANGLUA -3 tranigg-  8  (high) immaqnt-  160 Rheumatoid factor <12 Thyroid stimulating hormone: 2.81 Does anyone know what this means?
    • Tuba1971
      I had been glutened from somewhere since I pretty much make all my food from scratch. I had to have an endoscopy which should gluten damage, had blood work which also indicated high gluten. 4 years ago when I had these tests my gluten levels were all in good alignment. It comes down to my levothyroxin accord brand that must have gluten in it. I switched to synthroid 3 weeks ago and have been doing much better and am able to sleep at night again.
    • PA Painter
      That somes it up. It is worth mentioning GliadinX does not reduce symptoms for me at all. I also react to banana, avacado, cabbage, Oatmeal, and pecans among other things. If anyone else out there is like me, I had to eliminate gluten and all processed food before I could start to heal. I wish I had know this a long time ago. Thanks for the acknowledgement.
    • Viroval
      Thanks for sharing this detailed explanation. It’s really helpful to understand the differences between celiac disease and gluten sensitivity. I had no idea that gluten withdrawal could feel similar to addiction, and it’s great to have that context when considering how it affects people. It’s also good to know how important it is to continue eating gluten for accurate testing. I’ll keep all of this in mind!
×
×
  • Create New...