Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

GLIADIN, DEAMINATED, IGG Elevated


creativemuse

Recommended Posts

creativemuse Rookie

Ah the joys of electronic medical records. I went to the doc this week for GI upset and she included a GLIADIN, DEAMINATED, IGA & IGG, SERUM test as part of the workup. The results were released automatically to MyChart so I was able to access them online without talking to the doctor, but she added a note (I assume to the nurse) "Let her know that her celiac sprue test (for gluten intolerability) was positive. There are false positives however so the confirmatory test is an egd with biopsy of the small intestine so I will get that scheduled for her. Don't change her diet before that or we won't get an accurate test."

The results were: 

Gliadin IgG 29
Reference range: <20
Gliadin IgA 14
The results should be interpreted in relation with the IgA levels. If patient is
found to have undetectable IgA levels, future serologic testing with only
IgG-based assays for Gliadin (deamidated) and Tissue Transglutaminase is
recommended.
Reference range: <20

As far as I can tell, no other celiac specific tests were run, but my SED rate was slightly elevated.

19 mm/hr Standard 0 - 15 mm/hr

Of course it is a holiday weekend in the US, so I can't call to schedule the endoscopy until Tuesday. Dr. Google is full of all kinds of confusing information. I know that nobody can diagnose me over the internet, but I think what I am reading is telling me that biopsy is definitely indicated. I know that I cannot change anything until after the test to avoid a false negative, but I'm trying to get an idea of the odds. Some things I read say 90%+ chance of celiac with this result. Is that correct or am I mixing up which test is which?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

Hi,

You are right the gliaden IgG is an antibody test for celiac disease.  You are positive on the test so that means your immune system is reacting to the presence of gluten in your diet.  The endoscopy is fairly simple and easy.  They put an thin tube down the throat and take a look around.  While they are touring the neighborhood they take 4 to 6 small samples of tissue for microscopic examination.  If those biopsy samples show the typical damage associated with celiac you get the diagnosis of celiac disease.  Endoscopy sometimes take few months to happen.

Welcome to the forum! :)

  • 2 weeks later...
creativemuse Rookie
(edited)

Update: I had the endoscopy this morning. The GI asked if I had a positive celiac panel and I mentioned that only the Deamidated IGA/IGG had been run and he got positively cranky. He went back and looked and said that it was only mildly elevated and acted irritated that I was even having a biopsy at this point. He did order the EMA, IGA and TTG blood tests, so I went over and did that blood draw after the endoscopy. He told me not to change my diet until those blood tests and the biopsy results come back because he was doubtful it was celiac. He also commented on the fact that I am not anemic. I understand not changing anything until after the testing, but there isn't anything left to test at this point, right? I'm not going to hurt anything if I go gluten free now? I just want to feel better!

Edited by creativemuse
cyclinglady Grand Master

Listen to the GI.  Do not go gluten free yet.  Why?  What if they mess up on the biopsies?  You should wait until you have the blood tests back and the pathologist’s report in hand.  Believe me, Mistakes can be made (losing things, etc.).  Something caused that elevation.  If it turns out not to be gluten, then what?  

creativemuse Rookie

The final results are very mixed. TTG 39 (ref >20), EMA Negative, DGP IgG 29 (ref >20) and the note from the doctor says "small bowel biopsy reveals inflammation but no evidence of celiac sprue. However TTG antibody is mildly elevated which is specific for celiac sprue. It is possible she has early celiac sprue without damaging the small bowel." He ordered the gene test as well. I uploaded my Ancestry DNA test to Promethease and it indicates that I have at least one gene associated with celiac, but it can't be taken as medical advice, so I am waiting for official results on the lab test. I am waiting for the pathology report to find out how many samples he took, etc. 

How hung up on the label of celiac do I need to be? Should my parents and siblings and children be screened based on these results? I have stopped eating gluten as of yesterday and I am just getting my feet wet learning about cross contamination, etc. Do I just assume zero tolerance and behave as if it is 100% confirmed? I am already dreading our family vacation next month sharing a kitchen where literally 25+ family members will be in and out, cooking, grabbing snacks, etc.

 

Ennis-TX Grand Master
1 hour ago, creativemuse said:

The final results are very mixed. TTG 39 (ref >20), EMA Negative, DGP IgG 29 (ref >20) and the note from the doctor says "small bowel biopsy reveals inflammation but no evidence of celiac sprue. However TTG antibody is mildly elevated which is specific for celiac sprue. It is possible she has early celiac sprue without damaging the small bowel." He ordered the gene test as well. I uploaded my Ancestry DNA test to Promethease and it indicates that I have at least one gene associated with celiac, but it can't be taken as medical advice, so I am waiting for official results on the lab test. I am waiting for the pathology report to find out how many samples he took, etc. 

How hung up on the label of celiac do I need to be? Should my parents and siblings and children be screened based on these results? I have stopped eating gluten as of yesterday and I am just getting my feet wet learning about cross contamination, etc. Do I just assume zero tolerance and behave as if it is 100% confirmed? I am already dreading our family vacation next month sharing a kitchen where literally 25+ family members will be in and out, cooking, grabbing snacks, etc.

 

Just bring your own food, or your own microwave cooking kit. I keep a set of Nordic ware microwave omelette makers, everyday bowl, grill plates with splatter covers and steamers for traveling, they also rice cookers etcs. Put down a paper towel, mix up your meals and cook in the microwave from whole foods...and bring safe snacks, bars, MREs you can have. Butcher paper for your own easy safe prep areas and eating mat that you just throw away with the mess for easy clean up.

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Was the doctor’s diagnosis based on just the endoscopy?  Mine was normal, yet the pathologist’s report revealed patches of moderate to severe damage.  Plus, you probably know that the small intestine is the size of a tennis court and it is easy to miss damaged areas.  

Do not fret about the vacation.  I go to a family lake house that is packed with gluten eaters.  I bought a bin and keep in our room (adults get rooms and beds!).   We use lots of paper plates and cups and we run through items in the dishwasher.  I have a cheap non-stick frying pan and spatula, parchment paper, foil (to wrap items on the grille, etc).  You can use disposable items form the dollar store.  I keep some food in my room.  For example. I will eat chips, but once opened, I do not touch them.  Too many kids reaching in and forget about gluten, but dirty hands!  Of course, the adults do not condone this, but I am sure it happens (I was a kid once).   We use squeeze bottles for condiments.  You will figure it all out.  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    2. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    3. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    4. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,330
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    SEQ
    Newest Member
    SEQ
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you had both and endoscopy with biopsy and a colonoscopy. That helps me understand what you were trying to communicate. No, no! It never occurred to me that you were trying to mislead me. It's just that we get a lot of posters on the forum who are misinformed about what celiac disease is and how it is diagnosed so I need some clarification from you which you were so gracious to give.
    • barb simkin
      I had both the genetic genes for celiac.  My gastroenologist advised he also took a biopsy during one of my colonoscopies and endoscopy and advised I had celiac disease, along with stomach ulcers from my esophagus stomach down to my small bowel. I was shown the ulcers on the catscan and endoscopy report.  I also had polyps in 3 places throughout my large bowel. I was on a strict diet for months following.  I am sorry if I didnt define how I was diagnosed with celiac disease.  I am sorry if you think I was misleading you. I also had to pay $150.00 for the genetic testing.
    • trents
      So, I'm a little confused here. I understand you to say that you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac disease. Is this correct?  You have had genetic testing done to check for the potential for developing celiac disease and that was positive. Is this correct? I think you meant to type "gluten sensitivity" but you typed "gluten insensitivity". Just so we are clear about the terminology, there is celiac disease and there is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They are not the same but they have overlapping symptoms. Celiac disease causes damage to the small bowel lining but NCGS does not. NCGS is often referred to in short form as gluten sensitivity. However, people often use the terms celiac disease and gluten sensitivity interchangeably so it can be unclear which disease they are referring to. Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has one or both of  the genes that have been most strongly connected with the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. This makes the genetic test useful for ruling out celiac disease but not for diagnosing it. A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease because it doesn't permit the scope to go up into the small bowel where celiac disease does the damage. They use an endoscopy ("upper GI) for checking the small bowel lining for celiac damage.
    • barb simkin
      I did nor read the chocolate pkg as it was of fered to me and I ate 2 pcs. I do know that only very dark chocolate and and a very few others are gluten free. Most alcohols contain gluten. I have several yrs of not knowing my celiac condition as docs would not do the test. After looking on the internet about my sufferings I insisted on the gene trsting which showed positive for gluten insensitivity and a biopsy on my next colonoscopy that also showed positive which could not help the damage done to my small bowel. So I very rarely have a glass of wine
    • trents
      @barb simkin, are you sure the chocolate products are gluten-free and not "manufactured on equipment that also handles wheat products and tree nuts", i.e., cross-contamination? And what kind of alcoholic beverages are we talking about? Most beers are made from gluten-containing grains. Just checking.
×
×
  • Create New...