Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

A Setback For Celiac Research


Claire

Recommended Posts

Claire Collaborator

In case you missed this:

National Institute of Health Cuts May Decrease Celiac Disease Funding

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1272


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



angel-jd1 Community Regular

Claire-

You might want to read this thread. It has already been discussed on the board and has been put into action. Open Original Shared Link

-Jessica :rolleyes:

In case you missed this:

National Institute of Health Cuts May Decrease Celiac Disease Funding

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1272

Claire Collaborator

Sorry. I had not seen the previous post on this subject. NIH is only one of many to suffer from the massive budget cuts pending. College students, senior citizens and many research facilities will all suffer - sooner rather than later. Claire

tarnalberry Community Regular

That's interesting, since the Labor-Health and Human Services bill gave the NIH a 1% *increase* in funding over last years funding...

Summary of the effect of the DoD appropriations bill, which doesn't

talk

about the NIH at all, and the Labor-HHS appropriations bill, which

includes a 1% *increase* in funding for the NIH over FY 2005.

Open Original Shared Link

The section of the Labor-Health and Human Services bill covering the

NIH:

Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,864
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    RobiBob
    Newest Member
    RobiBob
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Agreed, and I can't remember exactly and haven't got time to check, but I think my blood didn't normalise for eight years! For years I read this forum thinking why can't I get my numbers down - everyone else manages to.   But my gastroenterologist didn't seem to worry about it, which makes me think he either thought I wasn't complying to the diet, or he'd seen similar cases.
    • trents
      Yes, being off gluten for 3 months would likely yield negative results. To get accurate testing redone you would need to restart gluten consumption for several weeks (the "gluten challenge") to the tune of at least 10g of gluten daily (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread).
    • trents
      That is one of the tests covered in the article I linked you above.
    • RMJ
      Antibodies to Deamidated gliadin peptides.  It is another celiac antibody test. The main test is the one you had, TTG,  But a full panel will also include DGP IgA and IgG.  I was positive on all of them!
    • Pete111
      I had been off of gluten for 3 months due to food testing came back that shows gluten intolerance. I had asked my health care provider that I wanted to be tested for celiac before stopping gluten. Once they actually listed it shows my immunoglobulin A was really elevated and on the AB, IGA part showed <1.0. Would this be a false negative given I had not gluten in months? I’m very frustrated that the the test was not done while eating gluten.
×
×
  • Create New...