Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Interpreting Negative Tests


jnclelland

Recommended Posts

jnclelland Contributor

Last summer I had a negative blood test for celiac and for some food allergies - but only after I had been wheat- and dairy-free for 6 weeks on the advice of my acupuncturist. After reading here for awhile, it occurred to me to wonder exactly what tests had been done, and if I could glean any information from them at all after 6 weeks off wheat (still eating barley and rye, though).

My main symptom had been eczema, on my face and the fingers of my right hand, and gradually worsening for about 10 years. In retrospect, I think I was just starting to have digestive symptoms, but they were mild enough that I didn't really realize I was having them until they went away. And since I quit wheat and dairy at the same time, I don't know which one was responsible for the digestive stuff.

After about 4 months wheat- and dairy-free (which made my ezcema maybe 80 or 90% better), I went completely gluten-free, and cut out yeast and vinegar as well. That seems to have taken care of the rest of my symptoms, so I'm pretty sure that I'm gluten-sensitive in some sense, although it's hard to know what was caused by gluten vs. the other stuff. (Vinegar definitely contributes to my eczema, for instance.)

So anyway, I finally got around to getting copies of my test results today. What was actually done was the tissue transglutamine test, and it looks pretty definitively negative:

tissue transglutamine IgA: 3.8 (< 20 is negative)

tissue transglutamine IgG: 3.9 (< 20 is negative)

I also had RAST tests done for some standard food allergens (egg white, milk, wheat, corn, peanut, soy, almond, shrimp, tuna), and they were all definitively negative as well.

So I'm left wondering what to make of all this, and whether it would be worth my while to pony up the $$$ for the Enterolab tests. I'm definitely NOT interested in going back on gluten for testing purposes. (Even if I were, my hunch is that even if I was starting to see celiac symptoms, it was probably in the very early stages and unlikely to show up on traditional tests without spending a LONG time back on gluten.)

I don't suppose that I have any definitive need for a diagnosis; I mean, I feel better off gluten, so just don't eat gluten, right? But I'm vaguely concerned that my kids could be impacted eventually, and it would be nice to have a better idea of what's actually going on with me.

Jeanne


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.