Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

IgG Negative, IgA Positive


CathWin

Recommended Posts

CathWin Newbie

Is Celiac a possibility with IgG negative? We went to the Dr. to try to identify the cause of stomach aches that are getting much better. They usually seem to be sugar related, so I was thinking a sugar enzyme deficiency. The Dr. added celiac screening to the bloodwork just in case. I was shocked to see that the Dr. wants my daughter to come in for an endoscopy to confirm celiacs. It is scheduled in a few days and my daughter is terrified. Since the results, all of my communication has been through online portal messaging. The nurse answers all of my questions and I can't get the answers I need. The Tissue Transglutaminiase IgG results were: IgG antibody value 13.84 negative (with negative range <20), IgA antibody value 113.38 positive (with positive range>30). IgA quantitative value 100. What I have read indicates that with a IgG negative, the chance of celiacs decreases and it might be something else. Is that right? On a side note, my daughter ate Panera Mac n cheese with baguette right before our appointment in the car. She was literally shoving the last bite of bread in her mouth as we walked in the door. Could this have caused a spike in results?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Is the IGA antibody test value of 113.38 a reference to the tTG-IGA test or total serum IGA? If it is the tTG-IGA then that is the first test ordered and the only test ordered (unfortunately) by many docs since it is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing. It is considered to do the best job of combining both specificity with sensitivity. If that is the test you reference it is strongly positive.

And yes, you definitely can have celiac disease with a negative IGG. The IGG tests are more specific for celiac disease but less sensitive. So, they can miss it sometimes.

Can you post all the tests results exactly as they appear on the report? Some more information about exactly which IGA tests and which IGG tests were run. There are more than just one of each.

Here is a primer for antibody testing: https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/

What your daughter ate immediately before the testing would have no impact. The tests don't measure gluten levels, they measure inflammation levels in the lining of the small bowel in response to the consumption of gluten over time (months). 

Wheatwacked Veteran
1 hour ago, CathWin said:

What I have read indicates that with a IgG negative, the chance of celiacs decreases and it might be something else.

Misinformation. The industry would like us to believe because their profitability is at stake.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Eating gluten before the tests is a good thing, and eating too little may make the test results invalid. Your daughter should keep eating gluten daily until all testing is completed.

Are those the only blood tests they did? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,265
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    V Arnold
    Newest Member
    V Arnold
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      It is more likely code for “we think there really was a good response to the treatment, but it was small or in a small percent of subjects so it would take a large clinical trial to try to prove it.”
    • Dana0207
      Thank you so much for your replies. Luckily the rash went away when I completely swore off gluten. It took several months but I have not had a flare in months. So a biopsy is no longer possible. The itch was terrible and apart from bleaching my skin the steroid lotions and potions did nothing. The Gliadin is for accidents and shall be a part of my travel kit from now on. This past exposure has made a me a little leery about eating anything that was not cooked in my kitchen or a dedicated gluten-free restaurant. As much as I used to love baked goods, I am cured and have become quite the gluten free baker to the point that friends and family forget that my cakes/cookies/and bread are not "real". I guess I will have to wait for the new blood test to come out to get confirmation but I have a suspicion that the rash was dermatitis herpetiformis.
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, I just wanted to share with the frustration of skin issues and seeing dermatologist and medications not working for years, I did my own healing experiment. As of last week I have been taking a drop internally under the tongue of Vetiver and putting on topically on sores Yellow/Pom.I am seeing a extreme difference at a rapid time.Im also noticing my nails a little harder. Ive always been into natural properties because I feel its safer for the body.I know short time, but really seeing a difference. I also feel the the trapped gases that causes bloating helps break down as well.Curious if any body else can benefit from and has tried. Products is made by Doterra by Dr Hill
    • Scott Adams
      We have a category of articles on this topic if you really want to dive into it: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/gluten-free-diet-celiac-disease-amp-codex-alimentarius-wheat-starch/
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents, and the rash you described, especially its location and resistance to steroids, sounds highly characteristic of dermatitis herpetiformis, which is the skin manifestation of celiac disease. The severe and prolonged reaction you're describing five days after a small exposure is, while extreme, not unheard of for those with a high sensitivity; the systemic inflammatory response can absolutely last for several days or even weeks, explaining why you still don't feel right. Your plan to avoid a formal gluten challenge is completely understandable given the severity of your reactions, and many choose the same path for their well-being. While experiences with GliadinX (they are a sponsor here) are mixed, some people do report a reduction in the severity of their symptoms when taken with accidental gluten, though it is crucial to remember it is not a cure or a license to eat gluten and its effectiveness can vary from person to person. For now, the absolute best advice is to continue being hyper-vigilant about cross-contamination—buffets are notoriously high-risk, even with good intentions. Connecting with a gastroenterologist and a dermatologist who specialize in celiac disease is essential for navigating diagnosis and management moving forward. Wishing you a swift recovery from this last exposure. If you have DH you will likely also want to avoid iodine, which is common in seafoods and dairy products, as it can exacerbate symptoms in some people. This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
×
×
  • Create New...