Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New to forum and at early stages of testing


Bob1234

Recommended Posts

Bob1234 Newbie

Hi there,

Thank you to all who answer questions here! You are appreciated for you help, guidance and support.

I have just had some celiac blood panels drawn and the results are as follows:

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA value 13 - reference range 0-19 units

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG value 11 - reference range 0-19 units

Endomysial Antibody IgA - negative

Immunoglobulin A on serum 259  - reference range 87-352

t-Transglutaminase (tTg) IgA 4H - range 0-3 (0-3 negative, 4-10 weak positive, >10 positive)

I have never been a big bread fan, in fact I probably eat about 2 sandwiches a year, I dislike pizza and I do not like pasta.  I cannot remember if my loathing comes from the way it makes me feel, or if I just don’t like those kind of food.  So all the glutens are almost eliminated from my diet naturally, without following a strictly gluten Free diet.  I’m probably just getting trace gluten from soy sauce etc used during cooking.  

So when I had my bloodwork done, there was nothing that stood out apart from the Transglutaminase blood test which was weak positive.

Is it worth pursuing to see if I have celiacs or just continue as I have been doing? There are days when I feel off and have tummy aches and headaches but nothing that prevents me from functioning.  Just don’t want to be causing internal damage if I have celiacs!

Thanks for listening and helping me out!

much appreciated.

take care

Bob

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

So it sounds like you are eating a "low gluten" diet but are not gluten free. Yes, you can still be experiencing damage to the small bowel villi even with low levels of gluten intake. Lack of symptoms is not necessarily synonymous with no damage.

Bob1234 Newbie

Thank you Trents.  Yes, I would say I follow a low gluten diet.  
I am waiting on a referral to a GI Dr.  Do you think based on the one blood test marker that was weak positive, that it’s work pursuing? 
I have periodic symptoms which is why my primary care Dr decided to test.

thanks for all you do!

take care

 

trents Grand Master

Unless you are willing to undergo a "gluten challenge," any retest of blood antibodies is likely to yield marginal results as it already has. The Mayo Clinic guidelines for a pretest gluten challenge is the daily consumption of at least two slices of wheat bread (or the gluten equivalent) for 6-8 weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. If you really need a definitive answer that regimen would need to be followed.

But because you were already eliminating most gluten from your diet, my guess would be that you do have celiac disease in view of the weak positive tTG-IGA and because you have appropriate symptoms. The tTG-IGA antibody test is the most trusted test for celiac disease.

IMO, the smartest course of action would be to commit to a strict gluten free diet and see if your symptoms improve. The other thing I would suggest is to consider genetic testing to see if you have any of the two or three genes that we know are associated with celiac disease. Having the genetic potential does not guarantee that you have or will develop active celiac disease because 40% of the general population has one or more of the genes. But not having the genes would rule out celaic disease. But it would not rule out gluten sensitivity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,127
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Susie1967
    Newest Member
    Susie1967
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • NoriTori
      @Scott Adams No one said anything about eating gluten consistently until testing, the appointment was scheduled and an address was given. I don't even have access to the results as it stands. I was just told "everything looks fine, but slight irritation." I don't know if they took a biopsy because I have no access to the results. I don't know how many samples they took (I recently learned they're supposed to take more than one), I don't know what things looked like internally, it was just word of mouth and I didn't know any better to pry and get copies of everything. And I know! I also have chronic Anemia, never truly resolved UNTIL I went gluten free, and low vitamin D (fairly normal in black community), and low creatine (also resolved with gluten free diet). I plan to request a new dermatologist! As well as a referral to Gastro. Food/symptom diary is a great idea though. I have no way of cooking as it stands, so even just the basics wouldn't work for me.
    • trents
      @NoriTori, "gluten intolerance" is a general term that can refer to either celiac disease or NCGS. NCGS is often referred to as "gluten sensitivity" for short. Though, admittedly, there is still a great deal of inconsistency in the use of terms by the general public.
    • NoriTori
      @trents A gluten intolerance is a real possibility! I never ruled it out, but am keen on finding out the EXACT cause. I'd want testing done again to be sure it's not celiac, or SIBO (which I've considered) or other digestive disorder. Celiac seems the most pertinent considering its implications.
    • sillyac58
      Thanks so much Scott. I would be incredibly grateful to the gluten gods if eliminating oats was the magic cure. In the meantime, it's nice to have moral support! 
    • trents
      Understood. And don't beat yourself up about this. Many are in the same boat as you, having experimented with the gluten-free diet before getting formerly tested. It is a logical, common sense approach when you don't have the knowledge about how testing works or you don't have the healthcare resources to afford testing. And some experience such severe reactions to gluten that it is impossible to get through the gluten challenge in order to get tested. So, they must live with the ambiguity of not knowing for sure if they suffer from celiac disease or NCGS. But at the end of the day, the antidote is the same for both. Namely, life-ling abstinence from gluten. Recently there was an article on posted on this forum about the develop of a new testing method for diagnosing celiac disease that do not require a gluten challenge. It is still in the developmental stage and probably years away from becoming main streams even if it pans out. But there is hope at least.
×
×
  • Create New...