Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Someone Please Just Tell Me What To Do!


JenP

Recommended Posts

JenP Newbie

For those of you who read and responded to my topic last week "My Doc is the biggest Jerk", thank you. It was excellent advice from everyone, however, I need more help so I am back. Just a recap, Doc #1 ran a two panel blood test, Anti-gliadin (came back negative) and transglutamasine tissue (came back a very positive 69). Biopsy was negative, though he dismissed that rather quickly because he felt that he could have easily sampled a healthy piece of intestine. I don't know how many biopsies were took. He also mentioned that a small portion of my intestine was red and inflammed. He told me to go gluten free and call him in a month. By the advice of others and my own instinct was to get a second opinion. Crohn's disease runs in my family, and my grandfather died at 50 from stomach and colon cancer. Off to Dr. Ego I went, who treated me like sh*t and basically told me I could have anything. He also mentioned that doc#1 did not run all the appropriate bloodwork screening for celiac and he would never tell someone to go gluten free based on my results. He ran the endomysial screening and said if it came back positive it was very likely I had celiac. If negative very unlikely I had celiac. I'm scheduled for a colonoscopy in two weeks. He wants biopsies of my colon, and would want to probably do the endoscopy over, because he wasn't sure how many biopsies were took, and if he sampled from the right areas.

Well, the nurse called me and aid endomysial was negative. She kind of laughed and said, "Well that's great news, that means you can still eat bread!" In the meantime I'm thinking, yeah great, it's not celiac, it's something else than that could be worse, like Crohn's or colitis! I said to the nurse I didn't understand how I coud have had such a positive result on the previous bloodwork, and now this one negative. She says, "Well, I know this may be hard to believe, but labs do make mistakes sometimes!" Again, I'm just thinking, ok, which lab made the mistake then. This Dr. made no bones about it with me that he was going to heavily rely on the endomysial versus the TTG.

Not that I want to be a celiac, but I was almost hoping for a positive bloodtest. I'd have my answer, I could go back to my old doc who I liked, but just felt he was a little too hasty to diagnose me on 1 suspicious bloodtest, I could cancel my colonoscopy, and move on. Now, I have to worry do I have Crohn's or colitis? Dr. Ego even said, he could do the colonoscopy and find nothing! I could have irritable bowel (Which I have been told more than once before) on top of some virus, or something else to throw off my bloodwork. What I do know, is that I think Dr. Ego is too busy for me. He's supposedly "the best" and people wait many months to see him. When I saw him, there was over a 2 hour wait, and everyone in the waiting room looked VERY, VERY sickly. Family members were crying, it was ugly. As much as I hate to admit it, he seems to be exhausting every possibility and made some valid points. He probably is an excellent Dr., I just can't stand him though. Everyone has a different opinion on what to do....

Suck it up Jen, he may be a jerk, but if he knows what he's doing, that's what's important. Get the right diagnosis.

Go back to Doc #1 and tell him what's going on and see how he reacts to the new information.

Call my family doctor (who I happen to love and he was the one that push me to the front of the line to see Dr. Ego when there was a 4 month wait) and see what he thinks.

Get a new doctor. I was referred to one by a family who absolutely adores him, and he's supposed to be excellent. There is a one month wait to see him. He's a far drive, but it may be worth it.

I feel like there's pro and cons to every scenario. I'm just so tired and frustrated right now and I've spent days just wallowing about what to do.

Any thoughts you guys have, whether it's on the bloodwork discrepancy or the doc situation would be appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mommida Enthusiast

IMO Great doctors are the ones who listen to their patients. Go back to the doctor you feel comfortable with, if he feels you should be with a specialist pull out refferal for the new doc your friend loves.

L.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You had a high positive on your tTg, you are at least gluten intolerant if not celiac. You got lucky with your first doctor, and an a-- for the second opinion (IMHO). I would go back to the first doctor and stay with him. I would also go gluten free and then if you still feel you want the colonoscopy or your over 50 get one. But the relief from the diet may be enough so that you don't feel you need one anymore. I would definately use a different GI for the procedure though.

Guest nini

I would go back to Dr. #1 AND go gluten-free and see how your body responds to the diet... give yourself a good month or more on the diet to see if you notice any improvement in symptoms. Dr. #1 can monitor your progress and advise you if you need further testing for other conditions. The tests IMHO are subject to interpretation and not sensitive enough for all cases of gluten intolerance. Gluten intolerance can be the cause of IBS or can aggravate it, so keep that in mind. Also, I firmly believe that positive dietary response is the best diagnostic tool there is. If you do well off of gluten then you have your answer, if you do not improve at all, you can still pursue other testing. But the only reason to continue consuming gluten would be if you feel you have to pursue imperfect testing. Just my opinion but I feel you are better off with Dr. #1 that listens to you and just see if your symptoms improve on the gluten-free diet. What can it hurt to try it? After all, the diet is the only treatment for celiac if indeed that is what you have.

Guest greengirl

My blood test and biopsy were negative, but I had all the classic celiac symptoms so I did the Enterolab stool test. It showed that I was gluten intolerant and that I had 2 copies of the celiac gene. I then took this information back to my GI doc and he accepted it as evidence of Celiac.

As you mentioned, Crohn's is a concern for me, as well, because I have ulcerations in my small intestine (found through the camera capsule). I don't have the bleeding or fever that often accompanies Crohn's, though, and it doesn't run in my family. Basically, there's evidence for both, and my doctor doesn't know which it is either. In any case, going gluten free helped me tremendously and I've taken it one step further with the Specific Carbohydrate Diet in an attempt to heal the ulcers.

At this point my focus is on healing, rather than on pinpointing Celiac or Crohn's. Maybe the Enterolab test would give you the peace of mind to go gluten free. Also, the camera capsule might rule out Crohn's for you.

Christine

Nancym Enthusiast
... he would never tell someone to go gluten free based on my results.

I always think this is so bizarre. What do they think will happen if you go gluten-free and see how you feel, your nose will fall off? Ultimately there just is no good test that can tell you whether or not you are sensitive to gluten but not so far along you have damaged villi. That's the role a dietary test (of exclusion) can play. Gosh, a few weeks of changed eating that could possibly save you from colon cancer in middle age? Seems like a common sense to me.

I didn't have a biopsy, basically my first indication I had problems with gluten was how much better I felt when I wasn't eating it. I did follow up with Enterolab just because I was curious, but I was pretty content to let my dietary results dictate what course I should follow.

Good luck!

rmmadden Contributor

Jen,

Based on my experience I have come to understand that medicine is not the exact science I once thought it to be. Doctors are guessing based on any number of variables. Guess right and order the correct tests then you've got a good doctor. Guess wrong.....well, we've all been there.

Your best bet is to listen to what your body tells you. Going gluten-free for a while won't harm you any and if you feel better then you know you're on to something.

Best of luck!

Cleveland Bob B)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,027
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    EmmaGraceeee
    Newest Member
    EmmaGraceeee
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.