Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doubting Dr. Thomas


L.A.

Recommended Posts

L.A. Contributor

My gastro guy is having issues commiting 100% to me having celiac disease <_< . A specialist did the blood test which came back positive for Celiacs. My gastro guy decided to do a biopsy and it was negative. Is the blood test proof positive?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mouse Enthusiast

Yes, it is. You can never have a false positive, but you can have a false negative. Many doctors still think of the biopsy as the gold standard. The problem with it, is if he does not take enough biopsies from the right areas, then the test can be negative. I only had the blood test and never the biopsy. But, I had also become the "classic celiac" before the diagnosis. So, my doctor did not think it was necessary for me to have it done.

Phila Rookie

My doc diagnosed me based on symptoms alone, but then again I had a tonne of symptoms. He's a huge proponent of looking at dietary response to come to a diagnosis. I must say that I do regret not having all of the tests, although I am absolutely convinced I have celiac disease.

Today was actually a scary day for me. My prolactin levels are high again so doc has ordered a CT scan to check for a pituitary tumour. I'd been having a tonne of issues lately which I thought were biliary related, but my doc seems to have dismissed that. He's worried about the prolactin and kept staring at those numbers.

Guest nini

a pos. blood test is absolutely proof positive... just because the biopsy didn't find anything, it doesn't mean diddly squat... you have Celiac... welcome to the club! Get on with the business of getting well.

I was dx'ed on positive blood work and positive dietary response alone, I did not have a biopsy at all... my Dr. had said that since my blood work was positive I absolutely have it and did not need to go through a biopsy to confirm it.

Guest Robbin
My doc diagnosed me based on symptoms alone, but then again I had a tonne of symptoms. He's a huge proponent of looking at dietary response to come to a diagnosis. I must say that I do regret not having all of the tests, although I am absolutely convinced I have celiac disease.

Today was actually a scary day for me. My prolactin levels are high again so doc has ordered a CT scan to check for a pituitary tumour. I'd been having a tonne of issues lately which I thought were biliary related, but my doc seems to have dismissed that. He's worried about the prolactin and kept staring at those numbers.

:( I am sorry you have been having these problems. I haven't seen you post before, so welcome.

Also, ditto for me--the positive bloodwork means just that--positive. Why the medical community does this "song and dance act" around diagnosing this disease, is beyond me.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I'm very new here, and still wondering around just reading, reading, and reading. I came across this and wanted to ask, where do you think my daughter fits in here?

For reference purposes - the lab we used gave us the following information as THEIR norms. I realize other labs have other standards.

Ttg - <5 (my daughter's was 4)

IgA - <10 (hers was 9)

IgG - <11 (hers was 72)

EMA - Negative (no number provided)

Total IgE <20 - (hers was over 100 - 170 if I correctly recall)

Positive SPT - wheat/egg

Positive RAST - wheat/egg

(She has other allergies as well)

Negative biopsy for Villi damage, however... she has duadenal ulcers that I'm told are consistant with Celiac.

So, is she.... or isn't she?

She wasn't diagnosed Celiac. She was diagnosed with a Gluten Intolerance. What's the difference? Nothing, as far as the diet is concerned, right??

Thanks!

aikiducky Apprentice

You're right, gluten intolerance means exactly the same diet-wise as celiac, and you need to exactly as careful about cross-contamination, too.

"Celiac" is a name that the doc gives to a disease when all the symptoms and test results are present that the medical community has agreed on have to be there. So when the test results and symptoms aren't exactly according to that list, but it's obvious that gluten is a problem, they call it "gluten intolerance" instead to be completely PC. You need to realize that the definition of "celiac" keeps changing, so in the future, someone with the exact same picture as your daughter may well get diagnosed celiac. They keep changing the definition as more information comes available with reseach, but that of course happens slowly.

Pauliina


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    2. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    5. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,472
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kygirlsusan
    Newest Member
    kygirlsusan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
    • Ginger38
      It has been the most terrible illness ever! Going on 3 weeks now… I had chicken pox as a kid… crazy how much havoc this dormant virus has caused after being reactivated! No idea what even caused it to fire back up. I’m scared this pain and sensitivity is just never going to improve or go away 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.