Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is 17 Months Too Young To Do Blood Test For Celiac?

Luvs to Scrap

Recommended Posts

Luvs to Scrap Apprentice
Luvs to Scrap
Posted

My husband tested positive last fall and my son who is almost 4 tested positive 2 weeks ago. Is it too early to test my 17 month old daughter. Our doctor didn't think my husband or son had it until we insisted on being tested. (my husband's grandma has celiac) I don't want to insist on testing if it is too early for the gluten antibodies to show anyway. My husband and both children appear to be thriving (both kids are top of growth chart) but have lots of loose stools. Just checking to see if anyone knew when the blood work would start to show up. Thanks for your help. Hoping daughter doesn't have it but suspect she does.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


AndreaB Contributor
AndreaB
Posted

If you don't want to continue with the gluten filled diet with her you could always do the enterolab stool test. She is definately old enough for that. www.enterolab.com. I have read that a lot of tests are inconclusive before 5 yrs but don't know if that includes blood tests. If you suspect she has gluten intolerance or celiac and your insurance covers it it wouldn't hurt to get the blood test done. If it is negative you have the decision to have her go gluten free or have the enterolab tests done which can catch gluten intolerance before it gets bad...if she has mild symptoms or none for instance. My family didn't have any symptoms, just my allergy tests. 3 out of 4 of us have an active gluten intolerance. All the info is in the sig.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

No, 17 months is not too young for the test. It might even turn out accurate, and it may be positive. However, if it is negative, at this age it can very well be a false negative. In which case I would go with Enterolab if wanting a definite answer. Or just put the whole family on a gluten-free diet and see the whole gang thrive!

VydorScope Proficient
VydorScope
Posted
My husband tested positive last fall and my son who is almost 4 tested positive 2 weeks ago. Is it too early to test my 17 month old daughter. Our doctor didn't think my husband or son had it until we insisted on being tested. (my husband's grandma has celiac) I don't want to insist on testing if it is too early for the gluten antibodies to show anyway. My husband and both children appear to be thriving (both kids are top of growth chart) but have lots of loose stools. Just checking to see if anyone knew when the blood work would start to show up. Thanks for your help. Hoping daughter doesn't have it but suspect she does.

Honestly? Theres no good answer to that "is it time to test yet" questoin. At 18mos my son tested postive, so at least my son's GI doctor does not think its too young. I would go ahead with the blood test (NOT the endscope! Just the blood test), and see what it says...

If its positve, well thats easy, gluten-free for him too.

If its negative, then there are three possiblities.

1) false negative he currently is suffereing, but the test was wrong

2) true negative - he is not currently suffering, but will when he gets older (celiac disease often does this)

3) true negative - he is not currently suffering, and never will.

See a negative leaves questions. If you get a negative you probably want to try him on a gluten-free diet for a while and see if you notice any changes. If you do you might want to consider a "gluten challange", which is where you out him back on gluten and see if symptons start to return/come out.

HTH

  • 2 weeks later...
Luvs to Scrap Apprentice
Luvs to Scrap
Posted
  • Author

Just wanted to let everyone know Kirsten and I took the blood test for celiac today. They couldn't locate a good vein so we got to wait while blood dripped from her big toe. She was not happy ;) ! Now we just have to wait for a week or 2 to know if it showed up. I'll let you know what we find out. If her bloodwork is negative is there a way to diagnose her later even if she has been eating gluten free? (Most of our meals at home are since we already have 2 celiacs in the house. Thanks! Kendra

AndreaB Contributor
AndreaB
Posted

The only way to test her being gluten free is through enterolab and they can do the testing now with a stool sample. Click Open Original Shared Link for more info. Meanwhile we'll be waiting for you to post her results.

Luvs to Scrap Apprentice
Luvs to Scrap
Posted
  • Author

I called the dr today and his nurse said that both Kirsten and I are fine. She didn't tell me the score but just that we don't have celiac according to the blood test. DH says we should just wait a couple years and try again. (He has done no research whatsoever about his condition and relies on me to maintain his gluten-free diet. ) We diagnosed DS last month and he is still having major D issues which is affecting potty training. I am not sure if I want to wait that long to find out if Kirsten has it. I think she has quite a bit of D for her age and also has bouts of constipation to go with it. What would you experts recommend? Should I put her on a gluten-free diet and see if she gets better and forget getting a diagnosis? Save up for a Enterolab test for her and wait to see what that says or just feed her normally until we try again later like my DH wants? I'd appreciate your imput. I am very frustrated because I was hoping we could just be done after this test.

Kendra

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


AndreaB Contributor
AndreaB
Posted

Kendra,

Personally, I'd scrounge up the money, save it whatever for the enterolab tests. If she is just towards the beginning of a gluten intolerance then her blood test numbers will not show it. If you have to wait another 1,2,3,4 etc. years before it shows in her blood, how much worse will she be. If you are ok going gluten free without the tests than do so. It certainly won't hurt. If you or your husband need proof of something from the doctors than you will have to wait until it presents itself in her blood work. Enterolab is a good company and a lot of people have had a good, positive experience with them.

Luvs to Scrap Apprentice
Luvs to Scrap
Posted
  • Author
Kendra,

Personally, I'd scrounge up the money, save it whatever for the enterolab tests. If she is just towards the beginning of a gluten intolerance then her blood test numbers will not show it. If you have to wait another 1,2,3,4 etc. years before it shows in her blood, how much worse will she be. If you are ok going gluten free without the tests than do so. It certainly won't hurt. If you or your husband need proof of something from the doctors than you will have to wait until it presents itself in her blood work. Enterolab is a good company and a lot of people have had a good, positive experience with them.

Andrea, I called our insurance company this morning and the lady I talked to had never heard of celiac. :blink: She of course said Enterolab was out of network, etc and wanted me to find out the billing procedure and diagnosis codes they use for their billing of labs. She couldn't find if that kind of testing was covered since it is so unusual and thought that would be the best way to check. Would you be able to look at your bill and let me know what the codes are? I am trying to talk my DH into doing the entire gluten panel on Kirsten but he only wants to if insurance covers it. At this point I don't care about coverage just want my daughter better. Thanks! Kendra

AndreaB Contributor
AndreaB
Posted

Kendra,

Below I've copied the info from the email I received from enterolab. You would need to submit the billing to your insurance to be reimbursed as enterolab doesn't bill insurance companies. At least the codes can help you figure out how much insurance would cover. I included soy/egg/yeast just in case you are ever interested in those. This is for the whole panel and included the dairy at the time I ordered it....don't know if they are still offering the special on the dairy.

The ICD9 and CPT codes are necessary for submission for reimbursement to an insurance company.

ICD9 789.00

Tests Ordered:

1 : A) Gluten Sensitivity Stool and Gene Panel Complete *Best test/best value

* Itemized Costs and Insurance Codes:

-Anticasein IgA (CPT 83520) Cost: $0

-Quantitative fecal fat (CPT 82710) Cost: $70

-PCR Amplification (CPT 83898) Cost: $30

-DNA Isolation (CPT 83890) Cost: $30

-DNA Separation (CPT 83894) Cost: $30

-Probe Identification (CPT 83896) Cost: $30

-Molecular Identification and Interpretation (CPT 83912) Cost: $10

-Antigliadin IgA (CPT 83520) Cost: $99

-Antitissue transglutaminase IgA (CPT 83520) Cost: $70

2 : C) Egg, Yeast, and Soy Food Sensitivity Stool Panel

* Itemized Costs and Insurance Codes:

-Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae IgA (CPT 83520) Cost: $66

-Antiovalbumin IgA (CPT 83520) Cost: $66

-Anti-Soy IgA (CPT 83520) Cost: $67

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,899
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    dcarter1682
    Newest Member
    dcarter1682
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.