Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Disease Vs. Gluten Intolerance


billy

Recommended Posts

billy Rookie

i had a biopsy and blood test about 1.5/2 years ago, which came back negative (i believe because i had been gluten free for months), so my gi doc told me i had ibs with a gluten and dairy intolerance.

i think i have asked this before a while back, but this is still confusing to me: is there a difference between celiac and gluten intolerance?

i have an endo who still swears i'm celiac due to some other health problems (osteoporosis, arthritis, can't gain weight, etc.); however, i haven't shown vitamin deficiency either. should i ever be retested?

thanks...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Are you eating gluten-free? Why would you think you need to ever be retested, what would be the point? All you need to do is, to be gluten-free and dairy free, and you'll be okay. If your blood test was positive, and you are feeling better on the diet, you obviously have celiac disease, and that's that.

If you have osteoporosis, it seems likely that you're at least deficient in vitamin D and calcium and magnesium. Have the levels for those been tested?

Nancym Enthusiast

This is a very gray area but a lot of doctors who do work in this field are coming to believe that gluten sensitivity without villious atrophy is very damaging too. It is associated with all kinds of diseases, especially autoimmune diseases. Read the book "Dangerous Grains" and read over the papers on Dr. Fine's web site about why gluten sensitivity should be treated as seriously as full-blown Celiac disease.

CarlaB Enthusiast

Your gluten-free diet at the time of testing would be the reason you didn't have villous atrophy. Same thing happened to me. I had all the celiac symptoms, figured out gluten caused me problems, by the time I got tested I was healed enough that nothing showed up. I feel lucky that I figured it out on my own and that the damage was healed enough that my tests came out clear. I also feel lucky that my insurance company does not consider me to have the disease.

It does not matter if it's celiac or gluten intolerance. To me, it seems to be just a matter of semantics, both can have the same symptoms, both can be autoimmune, both require a gluten-free diet -- the only difference is that in celiac they have found villous atrophy. Does this mean that someone who had villous atrophy and it's now healed is no longer celiac but gluten intolerant? So, I think they're both the same thing, it's perhaps only a differentiation in how far progressed your disease was when discovered -- or in your and my cases, how far along the healing was.

No need to be retested.

billy Rookie
Are you eating gluten-free? Why would you think you need to ever be retested, what would be the point? All you need to do is, to be gluten-free and dairy free, and you'll be okay. If your blood test was positive, and you are feeling better on the diet, you obviously have celiac disease, and that's that.

If you have osteoporosis, it seems likely that you're at least deficient in vitamin D and calcium and magnesium. Have the levels for those been tested?

sometimes i'm gluten-free, sometimes i'm not. i'm one of those stubborn patients who need to hear a diagnosis with the positive test (i was negative on both) to start the therapy since the doctor thinks i'm fine. but i obviously have all the gi symptoms and other weird reactions (instant stomach pain, headache, fatigue, etc.) after eating gluten and i know i should go completely gluten-free...

my calcium and vit d were normal at last check; in fact, up until a month ago, my kidneys weren't filtering the calicum at all, causing kidney stone disease. but my magnesium has never been tested. anyway, thanks for your insight. i appreciate the candid advice!

This is a very gray area but a lot of doctors who do work in this field are coming to believe that gluten sensitivity without villious atrophy is very damaging too. It is associated with all kinds of diseases, especially autoimmune diseases. Read the book "Dangerous Grains" and read over the papers on Dr. Fine's web site about why gluten sensitivity should be treated as seriously as full-blown Celiac disease.

i will definitely read that book, thank you! i'm actually being tested right now for ra and lupus (i believe the latter started rearing its ugly head about seven years ago when all my health problems started). i will also share this with my doctors and my father, who is arguing that the intolerance isn't as bad as and is completely different than celiac disease. thank you!

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

I think you're on the right path. I'm negative for everything except antigliadin antibodies, which, according to my neuro doc, were "outrageously high". Played a number on my brain, let me tell ya. Good idea to get re-tested. They're finding more and more that Celiac doesn't necessarily mean just gut anymore . . . my neuro still says I have Celiac, even though the GI doc continues to tell him it's not CELIAC, it's GLUTEN INTOLERANCE . . . . semantics :rolleyes:

billy Rookie
Your gluten-free diet at the time of testing would be the reason you didn't have villous atrophy. Same thing happened to me. I had all the celiac symptoms, figured out gluten caused me problems, by the time I got tested I was healed enough that nothing showed up. I feel lucky that I figured it out on my own and that the damage was healed enough that my tests came out clear. I also feel lucky that my insurance company does not consider me to have the disease.

It does not matter if it's celiac or gluten intolerance. To me, it seems to be just a matter of semantics, both can have the same symptoms, both can be autoimmune, both require a gluten-free diet -- the only difference is that in celiac they have found villous atrophy. Does this mean that someone who had villous atrophy and it's now healed is no longer celiac but gluten intolerant? So, I think they're both the same thing, it's perhaps only a differentiation in how far progressed your disease was when discovered -- or in your and my cases, how far along the healing was.

No need to be retested.

it's nice to know i'm not alone! thank you for your take on the two. the consensus seems to be that both cause the body to react in a negative way. now why couldn't my gi doc have told me this??? i think i know what i have to do... thanks for the post!

I think you're on the right path. I'm negative for everything except antigliadin antibodies, which, according to my neuro doc, were "outrageously high". Played a number on my brain, let me tell ya. Good idea to get re-tested. They're finding more and more that Celiac doesn't necessarily mean just gut anymore . . . my neuro still says I have Celiac, even though the GI doc continues to tell him it's not CELIAC, it's GLUTEN INTOLERANCE . . . . semantics :rolleyes:

wow, sorry to hear about the effect it had on you. do you know if the gluten attacks the central nervous system too? i have unexplained neuropathy (just about everything i have is idiopathic...my 10+ specialists always say i'm a challenge...not exactly the words you want to hear from a specialist). i'm wondering if my whole body is screaming for help because of this. hmmm. thanks for the comment!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

Boy, howdy does it have an effect on the Central Nervous System! I have "Gluten Ataxia" -- the Perkinje cells in the cerebellum rely on gliosis for their nutrition . . . Unfortunately, one of the proteins on the Perkinje cells strongly resembles gliadin. The Antigliadin antibodies, in my case, have attacked these proteins. So it's as if I have small "shorts" in the electrical wiring throughout my cerebellum. I walk like the worst drunk you've EVER seen . . . in fact, my rheumatologist, neurologists and physical therapist (I'm also a PT), have all recommended that I use only my wheelchair, because the manner in which I walk, not to mention my falls, are taking a HUGE toll on my joints and spine. I also have MAJOR peripheral neuropathy. I'm to the point that, if I'm wearing shoes, I can't feel the ground beneath me -- only the shoes, and I fall MUCH more.

What's funny is that I should have known better . . . it was my secretary that pointed out to me how much I fall . . . before I had to close my office. She said that she waited for the "thud" in the room when I was treating someone . . . I just chalked it up to being "tired". I also didn't even THINK about the peripheral neuropathy when I stepped into the bathtub with no problem, but burned my butt every time!

There is a physician that was considered a quack 5 years ago for presenting this theory . . . five years later, no one's laughing at him anymore . . . I can''t remember his name -- I also have "word retrieval" difficulties because of the cerebellum . . . it controls a LOT more than we know . . . but he is in the UK.

Best of luck to you. I'll be sending good thoughts and prayers your way . . . If you want any additional info (because the people on this forum are probably SICK of hearing my story!), feel free to e-mail me at bodyworxinc@hotmail.com!

Lynne

occi Newbie

:D Thanks soooo much all of you for your posts! What i mean is, its so nice to not feel so stupid anymore! I started not eating wheat, then gluten, because of symptoms and 'inconclusive' test results and now the GP and Gastro think im nuts because i cant have coeliac confirmed! Now i feel better that perhaps gluten intolerance really does exist, and that i can be satisfied with my own diagnosis after all

Cheers all,

Hannah

eKatherine Apprentice
sometimes i'm gluten-free, sometimes i'm not. i'm one of those stubborn patients who need to hear a diagnosis with the positive test (i was negative on both) to start the therapy since the doctor thinks i'm fine. but i obviously have all the gi symptoms and other weird reactions (instant stomach pain, headache, fatigue, etc.) after eating gluten and i know i should go completely gluten-free...

So what will you do if the next test you run comes up negative, as it may? Would you keep eating gluten until you were deathly ill with permanent damage to your body?

AndreaB Contributor

I know this has already been mentioned but gluten intolerance and celiac are the pretty much the same thing. I consider gluten intolerance on one side of the line and celiac on the other side, differing degrees of other diseases and damage but still gluten free for life. If you have the funds and want more concrete evidence of your status I would recommend enterolab.com. We had our family tested and are among those that would not have known anything was brewing if we hadn't been tested. My oldest son has mild malabsorption too but no symptoms of anything being wrong. None of us had any symptoms of gluten intolerance, just went off of my allergy tests to decide to get tested.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    2. - lizzie42 replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    3. - knitty kitty replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    4. - lizzie42 replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Russ H's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Anti-endomysial Antibody (EMA) Testing

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,870
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    KABoston
    Newest Member
    KABoston
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Blood tests for thiamine are unreliable.  The nutrients from your food get absorbed into the bloodstream and travel around the body.  So, a steak dinner can falsely raise thiamine blood levels in the following days.  Besides, thiamine is utilized inside cells where stores of thiamine are impossible to measure. A better test to ask for is the Erythrocyte Transketolace Activity test.  But even that test has been questioned as to accuracy.  It is expensive and takes time to do.   Because of the discrepancies with thiamine tests and urgency with correcting thiamine deficiency, the World Health Organization recommends giving thiamine for several weeks and looking for health improvement.  Thiamine is water soluble, safe and nontoxic even in high doses.   Many doctors are not given sufficient education in nutrition and deficiency symptoms, and may not be familiar with how often they occur in Celiac disease.  B12 and Vitamin D can be stored for as long as a year in the liver, so not having deficiencies in these two vitamins is not a good indicator of the status of the other seven water soluble B vitamins.  It is possible to have deficiency symptoms BEFORE there's changes in the blood levels.   Ask your doctor about Benfotiamine, a form of thiamine that is better absorbed than Thiamine Mononitrate.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many vitamins because it is shelf-stable, a form of thiamine that won't break down sitting around on a store shelf.  This form is difficult for the body to turn into a usable form.  Only thirty percent is absorbed in the intestine, and less is actually used.   Thiamine interacts with all of the other B vitamins, so they should all be supplemented together.  Magnesium is needed to make life sustaining enzymes with thiamine, so a magnesium supplement should be added if magnesium levels are low.   Thiamine is water soluble, safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  There's no harm in trying.
    • lizzie42
      Neither of them were anemic 6 months after the Celiac diagnosis. His other vitamin levels (d, B12) were never low. My daughters levels were normal after the first 6 months. Is the thiamine test just called thiamine? 
    • knitty kitty
      Yes, I do think they need a Thiamine supplement at least. Especially since they eat red meat only occasionally. Most fruits and vegetables are not good sources of Thiamine.  Legumes (beans) do contain thiamine.  Fruits and veggies do have some of the other B vitamins, but thiamine B 1 and  Cobalamine B12 are mostly found in meats.  Meat, especially organ meats like liver, are the best sources of Thiamine, B12, and the six other B vitamins and important minerals like iron.   Thiamine has antibacterial and antiviral properties.  Thiamine is important to our immune systems.  We need more thiamine when we're physically ill or injured, when we're under stress emotionally, and when we exercise, especially outside in hot weather.  We need thiamine and other B vitamins like Niacin B 3 to keep our gastrointestinal tract healthy.  We can't store thiamine for very long.  We can get low in thiamine within three days.  Symptoms can appear suddenly when a high carbohydrate diet is consumed.  (Rice and beans are high in carbohydrates.)  A twenty percent increase in dietary thiamine causes an eighty percent increase in brain function, so symptoms can wax and wane depending on what one eats.  The earliest symptoms like fatigue and anxiety are easily contributed to other things or life events and dismissed.   Correcting nutritional deficiencies needs to be done quickly, especially in children, so their growth isn't stunted.  Nutritional deficiencies can affect intelligence.  Vitamin D deficiency can cause short stature and poor bone formation.   Is your son taking anything for the anemia?  Is the anemia caused by B12 or iron deficiency?  
    • lizzie42
      Thank you! That's helpful. My kids eat very little processed food. Tons of fruit, vegetables, cheese, eggs and occasional red meat. We do a lot of rice and bean bowls, stir fry, etc.  Do you think with all the fruits and vegetables they need a vitamin supplement? I feel like their diet is pretty healthy and balanced with very limited processed food. The only processed food they eat regularly is a bowl of Cheerios here and there.  Could shaking legs be a symptom of just a one-time gluten exposure? I guess there's no way to know for sure if they're getting absolutely zero exposure because they do go to school a couple times a week. We do homeschool but my son does a shared school 2x a week and my daughter does a morning Pre-K 3 x a week.  At home our entire house is strictly gluten free and it is extremely rare for us to eat out. If we eat at someone else's house I usually just bring their food. When we have play dates we bring all the snacks, etc. I try to be really careful since they're still growing. They also, of course, catch kids viruses all the time so I  want to make sure I know whether they're just sick or they've had gluten. It can be pretty confusing when they're pretty young to even be explaining their symptoms! 
    • Scott Adams
      That is interesting, and it's the first time I heard about the umbilical cord beings used for that test. Thanks for sharing!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.