Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Ttg Negative Biopsy

Hells Bells

Recommended Posts

Hells Bells Apprentice
Hells Bells
Posted

I had a positive Ttg blood test 45 normal<20 I then had to wait seven weeks for my biopsy which came back negative. I had been gluten free except for a 5 day gluten challenge before my blood test for 4 months , my GI doc said to stay gluten free until 3 days before my boipsy. Both times i ate the gluten I got severe stomach pain, felt like I was drugged and diarrhoea. I am 41 and always had tummy trouble.

I keep reading that the biopsy is the gold standard, so I think I am celaic but my blood screening was only the Ttg and the biopsy negative. I am concerned to get an officail diagnosis as it frightens me that f I get hospitalised or later in life put in an institution they will give me gluten.

Any thoughts?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted

Welcome to the board.

You should not have been gluten-free before your biopsy because it can give a false negative. The biopsy is the "gold standard"; however, it can only rule in celiac, it cannot rule it out because of the chance of a false negative.

I do not have an official diagnosis although I had elevated levels in a stool test. My biopsy had been negative as well, but I too had been gluten-free. My doc says that my dietary response is proof enough.

Be glad you don't have an official diagnosis, you will never have it be a pre-existing condition for insurance! As far as years later if you are in an old folks home, hospital, or anything, I'm sure no one will ask for proof if you claim you have celiac disease.

psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

Welcome to the forum!

There is no such thing as a negative biopsy, only one which is not positive.

Okay, that probably needs an explanation. A biopsy which finds damage to the villi conclusively proves celiac disease. But a biopsy which does not find damage does not mean that there is not some damage in a different place that was not sampled. It is also possible that the disease is in an early enough stage that detectable damage has not yet occurred. Or, in your case, three days of gluten was not enough to create detectable damage. Most experts say you need to eat gluten in quantity (equivalent to 3 slices of ordinary bread per day) for a number of WEEKS prior to a biopsy to get meaningful results.

I would say that the tTg is enough to give you your answer. That test is, as I understand it, very specific to celiac disease, and there is nothing ambiguous about a result more than twice the normal limit.

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

positive dietary response is the best indicator, if you responded well to the diet then reacted badly when reintroducing gluten then obviously gluten is a problem. It's irrelevent if it is Celiac or gluten intolerance because the treatment is identical, lifetime adherance to the gluten-free diet. As was stated before the biopsy can only confirm the dx, it can never ever completely rule it out if it's "negative"

oceangirl Collaborator
oceangirl
Posted
positive dietary response is the best indicator, if you responded well to the diet then reacted badly when reintroducing gluten then obviously gluten is a problem. It's irrelevent if it is Celiac or gluten intolerance because the treatment is identical, lifetime adherance to the gluten-free diet. As was stated before the biopsy can only confirm the dx, it can never ever completely rule it out if it's "negative"

I had a similar story- 4 months gluten-free before biopsy and it was negative. But I had a positive tTg test before that. I did a VERY brief gluten challenge before the biopsy (three days) and almost went to the hospital the pain was so bad! Then I tested through Enterolab to find I have two genes for gluten intolerance. That's all I needed to know to be gluten-free. Call it what you will, my body doesn't do well with gluten and it seems yours doesn't either. I hope you stick with the diet- there are ups and downs but you should see lots of improvement. Good luck!

lisa

Mayflowers Contributor
Mayflowers
Posted

I received my stool test kit and I'm sending it back tomorrow so I'll know once and for all. It also includes the free cows milk test which I'm interested in because I was allergic to milk as an infant but grew out of it.

I've been gluten free for about 3 weeks now and I noticed less bloating and much less indigestion. I was getting pressure, and gas pain in my sternum a few hours after eating wheat. I've also been unable to lose weight. I hope this makes a difference. I knew a guy who said he gave up wheat and lost 25 pounds just by doing that. I hope it works for me too. :)

I won't have a biopsy. I really don't want to be diagnosed as gluten intolerant. I won't be able to get insurance in the future. I just hope I can stay out of a nursing home as long as possible! :huh:

Hells Bells Apprentice
Hells Bells
Posted
  • Author

Thanks every one for the help, I am beginning to realise what a big thing this is. I will never go back onto gluten as I was so ill on it. I think I was in denial a bit and finding it hard to say I am celiac.

I had recently met someone in a rest home in Canada who as they did not have an official diagnosis were finding it hard to get gluten free and was served unsuitable food. They gave her breaded fish, regular oats and just took the noodles out of the soup.

I think that there needs to be a whole lot more education out there for what gluten free realy means.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

You appear to have a VERY ignorant GI doctor. Of course your biopsy was negative, your villi had enough time to heal sufficiently for a negative biopsy. And villi won't get damaged enough in five days to produce enough damage for a positive biopsy.

It can take six months to a year on a high gluten diet for enough damage to reoccur to test positive.

Anyway, your high Ttg and getting severe stomach trouble when you eat gluten is enough evidence anyway. Just go back to being gluten-free and get well!

eKatherine Apprentice
eKatherine
Posted

Considering how so many doctors consider the biopsy to be the gold standard, it's amazing they don't even bother to do it right so as to get reliable results.

ekdumas19 Apprentice
ekdumas19
Posted

I agree. Once I finally went to a GI doc, he immediately wanted to run a biopsy once i told him i had been diagonsed only through a blood test. I told him I had been gluten free for 4 years-but we still did the biopsy and of course found nothing! Good thing I didnt listen to him and didnt start chowing down on bread-or else i probably would have been even sicker than I was before I went to see him! Definitly not going back to that guy ever again. Also, when i had the biopsy-and i came to after being under for awhile-the nurse asked me if i wanted a muffin! A muffin! I was so drained and def. needed something to eat after fasting for practically a whole day-good thing i thought ahead and brought my gluten free roll! I was living in Cape Cod at the time-and I am so glad I now in Boston, where they have a lot more specialist here who hopefully wouldnt ever try to give me a muffin! Yikes!

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
Considering how so many doctors consider the biopsy to be the gold standard, it's amazing they don't even bother to do it right so as to get reliable results.

I couldn't agree more with this!

Hells Bells Apprentice
Hells Bells
Posted
  • Author

I think the problem with GI docs is a lot of them are primarily surgeons and arn't always as knowledgable about celiac as they should be. He was only able to give very limited dietry advice too, I got more info reading this site.

Mayflowers Contributor
Mayflowers
Posted

Sorry to say but a lot of Medicine is a money making business. If they do a biopsy they make money. I had a cardiologist try to con me into having a cardiac catheterization because of a "shadow" on my stress test that turned out to be just that. A shadow from my breast making it look like my artery was clogged. I had another opinion and the other doc said it wasn't a clogged artery. I refused the test. It's very risky. You could bleed to death.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,948
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Stephanie94
    Newest Member
    Stephanie94
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jacki Espo
      Covid caused reoccurrence of DH without eating gluten

      By Jacki Espo · Posted

      This happened to me as well. What’s weirder is that within a couple hours of taking paxlovid it subsided. I thought maybe I got glutened but after reading your post not so sure. 
    • Mari
      New Celiac Mama in My 30s

      By Mari · Posted

      Hi Tiffany. Thank you for writing your dituation and  circumstancesin such detail and so well writte, too. I particularly noticed what you wrote about brain for and feeling like your brain is swelling and I know from my own experiences that's how it feel and your brain really does swell and you get migraines.    Way back when I was in my 20s I read a book by 2 MD allergist and they described their patient who came in complaining that her brain, inside her cranium, was swelling  and it happened when she smelled a certain chemical she used in her home. She kept coming back and insisting her brain actually swelled in her head. The Drs couldn't explain this problem so they, with her permission, performed an operation where they made a small opening through her cranium, exposed her to the chemical then watched as she brain did swell into the opening. The DRs were amazed but then were able to advise her to avoid chemicals that made her brain swell. I remember that because I occasionally had brain fog then but it was not a serious problem. I also realized that I was becoming more sensitive to chemicals I used in my work in medical laboratories. By my mid forties the brain fog and chemicals forced me to leave my  profession and move to a rural area with little pollution. I did not have migraines. I was told a little later that I had a more porous blood brain barrier than other people. Chemicals in the air would go up into my sinused and leak through the blood brain barrier into my brain. We have 2 arteries  in our neck that carry blood with the nutrients and oxygen into the brain. To remove the fluids and used blood from the brain there are only capillaries and no large veins to carry it away so all those fluids ooze out much more slowly than they came in and since the small capillaries can't take care of extra fluid it results in swelling in the face, especially around the eyes. My blood flow into my brain is different from most other people as I have an arterial ischema, adefectiveartery on one side.   I have to go forward about 20 or more years when I learned that I had glaucoma, an eye problem that causes blindness and more years until I learned I had celiac disease.  The eye Dr described my glaucoma as a very slow loss of vision that I wouldn't  notice until had noticeable loss of sight.  I could have my eye pressure checked regularly or it would be best to have the cataracts removed from both eyes. I kept putting off the surgery then just overnight lost most of the vision in my left eye. I thought at the I had been exposed to some chemical and found out a little later the person who livedbehind me was using some chemicals to build kayaks in a shed behind my house. I did not realize the signifance  of this until I started having appointments with a Dr. in a new building. New buildings give me brain fog, loss of balance and other problems I know about this time I experienced visual disturbances very similar to those experienced by people with migraines. I looked further online and read that people with glaucoma can suffer rapid loss of sight if they have silent migraines (no headache). The remedy for migraines is to identify and avoid the triggers. I already know most of my triggers - aromatic chemicals, some cleaning materials, gasoline and exhaust and mold toxins. I am very careful about using cleaning agents using mostly borax and baking powder. Anything that has any fragrance or smell I avoid. There is one brand of dishwashing detergent that I can use and several brands of  scouring powder. I hope you find some of this helpful and useful. I have not seen any evidence that Celiac Disease is involved with migraines or glaucoma. Please come back if you have questions or if what I wrote doesn't make senseto you. We sometimes haveto learn by experience and finding out why we have some problems. Take care.       The report did not mention migraines. 
    • Mari
      My only proof

      By Mari · Posted

      Hi Jmartes71 That is so much like my story! You probably know where Laytonville is and that's where I was living just before my 60th birthday when the new Dr. suggested I could have Celiacs. I didn't go on a gluten challange diet before having the Celiac panel blood test drawn. The results came back as equivical as one antibody level was very high but another, tissue transaminasewas normal. Itdid show I was  allergic to cows milk and I think hot peppers. I immediately went gluten free but did not go in for an endoscopy. I found an online lab online that would do the test to show if I had a main celiac gene (enterolab.com). The report came back that I had inherited a main celiac gene, DQ8, from one parent and a D!6 from the other parent. That combination is knows to sym[tons of celiac worse than just inheriting one main celiac gene. With my version of celiac disease I was mostly constipated but after going gluten-free I would have diarrhea the few times I was glutened either by cross contamination or eating some food containing gluten. I have stayed gluten-free for almost 20 years now and knew within a few days that it was right for me although my recovery has been slow.   When I go to see a  medical provide and tell them I have celiacs they don't believe me. The same when I tell them that I carry a main celiac gene, the DQ8. It is only when I tell them that I get diarrhea after eating gluten that they realize that I might have celiac disease. Then they will order th Vitamin B12 and D3 that I need to monitor as my B12 levels can go down very fast if I'm not taking enough of it. Medical providers haven't been much help in my recovery. They are not well trained in this problem. I really hope this helps ypu. Take care.      
    • knitty kitty
      Does anyone here also have Afib

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Fascinating.
    • DebJ14
      Does anyone here also have Afib

      By DebJ14 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.