Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Someone Help


Linda56

Recommended Posts

Linda56 Apprentice

Ok I got my result on the test I sent to Entrolab. I went and read the link explaining about the range. I sent off for only the test that was 99.00 the antibody IGA I think it was. Anyway they say the test was postive. But my number was only 20. Reading it says you can be from 10 to 350. I read what they referred to as an explaination of this. That some people are producing more of the antibody from the blood. I don't really see how having a 20 is as important as having say a 100 number. I am assuming that at a 20 I am not having as much damage to the intestine as some with higher amounts. I am suppose to have a colonoscopy and was thinking of asking for a biopsy. I had the blood test for celiac a couple years ago that was negative. If I am not having a lot of damage in the intestine wouldn't a biopsy show anything really. I am kind of puzzled by this really and not sure what to do. If I don't have any damage and just a little high in the antibodies. I also have perinious anemia which I am told my body doesn't absorb b-12 in the intestine and I wonder if this could somehow be related. Anyway if I don't have a real problem to worry about this I don't want to put myself on a strict diet. Did anyone get thier test showing this low amount. Or if you have a better understanding of this. I am not going to be showing my doctor these results as I know he will not value it. Its like pulling teeth with him and an open mind. Thanks Linda


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

Anything over 10 is positive. My daughter eats gluten free with a 30. Mine was a 60. You need to remember, you are reacting to the gluten. Your number is double what normal is. You must have had health problems that prompted you to do the test. I tell my daughter that she should be happy she discovered she was having the reaction before she had the damage and health problems I did!! I guess theoretically the numbers could go up to 350, but I've never heard of them so high! Has anyone else?

edit, the anemia can definately be caused by malabsorption.

2kids4me Contributor

Daughter had the lowest # to be considered positive on blood work. Biopsies showed damage (subtotal villous atrophy). The GI said it is not common but does happen that the blood levels dont give any clue as to the intestinal damage.

Inability to absorb B 12 is common on celiac damage.

If you are positive - you are positive. Somone with a higher # doesnt necessarily mean they have more damage - it may be a reflection of their particular immune system and amount of gluten they ingest daily.

Linda56 Apprentice

Thank you both for giving me your thoughts about this. I guess I will go ahead and ask for a biopsy. The only reason I wanted to do this test is that I have loose bowel all the time and always have. I thought maybe its part of the problem. I also have inner ear disease that took away my balance function. I have never had a diagnosis on this some doctors have said Autoimmune inner ear disease which basically is where you get ear infection and your body goes in hyper mode and decides to kill good cells along with the bad. But I have also been told it was from toxic exposure from using toulene for years in a job I use to do. Some on a ear board I visit have found they have Celiacs and when they stop eating gluten their hearing gets better. I don't have the hearing loss part which also goes against the AIED diagnosis. So I have been looking for things that others have found and trying to follow up on them to see if I could find answers on my own about a couple different things. My mother also has perinious anemia which can be hereditary.

thanks again Linda

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarahmegan
    Newest Member
    Sarahmegan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.