Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food Label Law


parker

Recommended Posts

parker Rookie

I would appreciate thoughts on the thread below. I have to get this straight so I can make sure I'm a smart shopper for my son. Thanks! Patrick

--------------------------------------------------

I just looked at the following document, and have a question about

interpretation. ("American Celiac Disease Alliance Food Labeling

(FALCPA) Fact Sheet, November 2005")

I understand that manufacturers are required to list any of the 8 most

common food allergens, which of course includes wheat.  However, as I

understand the language at least, manufacturers are not required to

list other gluten-containing grains (such as barley or rye) if they

are part of one of the listed ingredients.  If my understanding is

correct, then Step 2 below (taken from the cited document above) is

not correct.

In other words, could barley or rye be part of one of the dreaded

generic terms (natural flavors, spices, coloring, vegetable protein,

modified food starch, vegetable gum, etc.), and not have to be listed

on the label?

Or, more specifically, do all gluten-containing grains now have to be

listed in their common name form? (barley, rye, etc.)

Someone please enlighten me!

Patrick

- - - - - - - - -

How Can I Determine if A Product Is Gluten-Free?

Step 1

Is wheat in the ingredients list or is it listed in an allergen

statement beneath the ingredients list?

If Yes, Stop! This product is not gluten-free.

If No, Proceed to Step 2.

Step 2:

Read the ingredients list. Is there Barley, Rye or Malt listed?*

If Yes, Stop! This product is not gluten-free.

If No, This product is gluten- free and safe to eat.

* People with celiac disease are advised to consult with their

physician about including oats in their diet.

--------------------------------------------------

Patrick,

This is my understanding and you may want to do your own research. 

The Food labeling act only applies to wheat and not any other gluten containing grains.

As far as your step 2 issue is concerned, the answer is yes and no.  I do not know if you were at the Dana Korn presentation at Sun Harvest that Alamo Celiac sponsored last year.  At that meeting Dana talked about hidden gluten.  Her explanation is that while it is technically possible for natural flavors, spices etc. to contain a gluten source other than wheat, it is unlikely.  She knew of no instance where this had occurred.  Plus she spoke to a number of food manufacturers who said that barley, rye and oats do not work well in these situations and they are expensive.

So technically speaking it is possible for those other grains to be hidden, but it is unlikely.  So, if it is not listed the food should be safe.

If I were writing that step 2, I think I would have worded it differently.

I hope this helps.

--------------------------------------------------

To follow up, is it the case that since the new food labeling law went

into effect, the old advice no longer applies?  For example, advice on

the celiac.com site suggests this below (I only typed in a subset of

their suggestions):

"

<https://www.celiac.com/st_prod .html?p_prodid=185 >

Forbidden List - Foods and Ingredients Not Safe for a Gluten-Free Diet

Cereal Binding

Edible Starch

Filler Hydrolyzed Plant Protein

The following items may or may not contain gluten depending on where

and how they are made,          and it is sometimes necessary to check

with the manufacturer to find out:

Artificial Color

Artificial Flavoring

Caramel Color

Coloring

Flavoring

Food Starch

Maltodextrin

Modified Food Starch

Modified Starch

Mono and Diglycerides

Monosodium Glutimate (MSG)

Mustard Powder

Natural Flavoring

Smoke Flavoring

Starch"

In other words, wheat is on the list of 8 allergens that must be

disclosed.  So, if wheat is in any of the above food items,

manufacturers must list wheat as an ingredient.

And further, although it's technically possible for another gluten

source to be in the above food items, in practice this doesn't tend to

happen.  Other gluten-containing grains simply do not have wheat's

"sticky" and perhaps other good properties from a food-manufacturing

standpoint, and they are also more expensive than wheat.

If this is true, I've been driving myself unnecessarily crazy in the

grocery store, and the advice "out there" really needs to be updated

(in light of the new labeling law).

Thanks!

Patrick

--------------------------------------------------


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



penguin Community Regular

Somebody is on the alamo celiac listserv :):P

Thanks for posting that, you beat me to it! :)

bklynceliac Apprentice

wait, i'm not totally following. So does this mean that any products made recently enough to follow the new labeling laws will almost certainly have no hidden wheat sources? If what the above states, it's possible for non-wheat glutens to be used but very unlikely, is correct, then does that mean we can look for "allergens: wheat" and be safe if we don't see it?

I must be misreading that.

mrparker Newbie

Yeah, I was the one that started the post. I'm just trying to make sure I understand the situation!

Patrick

CarlaB Enthusiast

Isn't it possible for malt to be listed as a natural flavoring? Or would it always be listed as malt?

mrparker Newbie
wait, i'm not totally following. So does this mean that any products made recently enough to follow the new labeling laws will almost certainly have no hidden wheat sources? If what the above states, it's possible for non-wheat glutens to be used but very unlikely, is correct, then does that mean we can look for "allergens: wheat" and be safe if we don't see it?

I must be misreading that.

I think it does mean that products following the new labeling law DO have to have wheat listed, either in the ingredient list itself, or at the bottom in the "allergens" section. As I read the law, they have the option of doing it either way. What they can not do is list something like soy sauce that is made using wheat, and not list wheat anywhere.

As for the other gluten sources (barley, rye, etc.), I believe you would see those listed in the ingredient list. And they aren't generally used in things like "natural flavorings." To quote what I was told by an informed member:

"At that meeting Dana talked about hidden gluten. Her explanation is that while it is technically possible for natural flavors, spices etc. to contain a gluten source other than wheat, it is unlikely. She knew of no instance where this had occurred. Plus she spoke to a number of food manufacturers who said that barley, rye and oats do not work well in these situations and they are expensive.

So technically speaking it is possible for those other grains to be hidden, but it is unlikely. So, if it is not listed the food should be safe. "

celiacgirls Apprentice

I read on this board somewhere that barley malt is listed under natural flavors by Pinnacle Foods in some syrups. I have e-mailed them to get an update. I'll post it when I get it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nic Collaborator

I never knew that the ingredient "malt" may not be from barley but from corn. So if you see "malt" and it is the only "bad" ingredient, call and ask what it is derived from.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,022
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pesto
    Newest Member
    Pesto
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.